This paper describes how the design of a catenary riser can be formulated as an optimization problem by using riser costs as the criteria function, design requirements in terms of maximum allowable stress and buckling capacity as constraints, and riser dimensions as free variables. The theory has been implemented in a computer program that can generate an optimized riser design for given design parameters such as water depth, diameter, pressure, and platform excursions. The developed software consists of a conventional program for two-dimensional riser analysis and a set of standard routines to minimize a nonlinear function subjected to general constraints. A case study where design parameters and requirements have been varied is also presented. The importance of buckling versus allowable equivalent stress as the most critical constraint has been investigated for varying water depth. The Conclusion of this work is that optimization is a useful tool for riser design, and that the proposed strategy for selection of design variables and constraints will enable an engineer to identify designs with minimum costs in an efficient way.

1.
Lame´, G., and Clapeyron, B. P. E., 1833, “Me´moire sur l’e´quilibre inte´rieur des corps solides homoge`nes,” Me´m. divers savans, Vol. 4.
2.
Larsen, C. M., and van Hoeken, A., 1995, “Optimisation of Steel and Titanium Stress joints for Marine Risers,” Proceedings, 5th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE), den Haag.
3.
Moe, J., and Gisvold, K., eds., 1971, “Optimization and Automated Design of Structures,” Division of Ship Structures, The Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
4.
Papalambros
P.
, and
Bernitsas
M. M.
,
1982
, “
Monotonicity Analysis in Optimum Design of Marine Risers
,”
Journal of Mechanical Design
, Vol.
104
, pp.
849
854
.
5.
Pesce, C. P., Aranha, J. A. P., Martins, C. A., Ricardo, O. G. S., and Silva, S., 1997, “Dynamic Curvature in Catenary Risers at the Touch Down Point: An Experimental Study and the Analytical Boundary-Layer Solution,” Proceedings, Seventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, HI.
6.
Schittkowski, K., 1985, “NLPQL: A FORTRAN Subroutine Solving Constrained Nonlinear Programming Problems,” J. C. Baltzer AG, Scientific Publishing Company.
7.
Schittkowski, K., 1994, Non-Linear Programming Software, Department of mathematics, The University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Lebanon.
8.
SINTEF, Snamprogetti, and Det Norske Veritas, 1996, “Limit State Design Guidelines for Offshore Pipelines,” The SUPERB Project, Draft Version, SINTEF Civil and Environmental Engineering, Trondheim, Norway.
9.
Sparks, C. P., 1980, “The Influence of Tension, Pressure and Weight on Pipe and Riser Deformations and Stresses,” ASME Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Dec.
10.
Sævik, S., 1990, “Pipeline Analysis System,” Vol. 3, Theory Manual, Rev. 1.0, Reinertsen Engineering, Trondheim, Norway.
11.
Timoshenko, S. P., and Googier, J. N., 1970, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY.
12.
Walsh, G. R., 1975, Methods of Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, London, U.K.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.