This paper describes development of a reliability-based screening procedure for platform assessments and requalifications. The objective of this procedure is to identify the critical structures and structure components that need to undergo a detailed assessment so that limited resources can be efficiently used. The reliability-based screening procedure helps identify potential failure modes and weak links in the structure, and provides information on the effects of load reduction and strengthening measures on the reliability of the platform. The reliability analysis screening procedure is based on a first-order second-moment (FOSM) formulation. A study is summarized of the implications of the simplified FOSM method. In the case of an eight-leg drilling and production platform located in the Gulf of Mexico, the results from FOSM reliability analysis are compared with those from first and second-order reliability methods (FORM and SORM). There is excellent agreement between the FOSM and FORM/SORM results.

1.
American Petroleum Institute, 1993, “Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Load and Resistance Factor Design (RP 2A-LRFD),” Washington, DC.
2.
Ang, A. H-S., and Tang, W. H., 1984, Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Vols. I and II, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
3.
Bea, R. G., 1990, “Effects of Water Wave Kinematics Uncertainty on Design Criteria for Offshore Structures,” Water Wave Kinematics, A. To̸rum and O. T. Gudmestad, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, U.K., pp. 103–158.
4.
Bea, R. G., and DesRoches, R., 1993, “Development and Verification of a Simplified Procedure to Estimate the Capacity of Template-Type Platforms,” Proceedings, Fifth International Symposium Integrity of Offshore Structures, Glasgow, Scotland, D. Faulkner et al., eds., Emas Scientific Pubs., pp. 129–148.
5.
Bea, R. G., and Smith, C. E., 1987, “AIM (Assessment, Inspection, Maintenance) and Reliability of Offshore Platforms,” Proceedings, Marine Structural Reliability Symposium, Ship Structure Committee and Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineering, New York, NY, pp. 57–75.
6.
Bea, R. G., and Mortazavi, M. M., 1996, “ULSLEA: A Limit Equilibrium Procedure to Determine the Ultimate Limit State Loading Capacities of Template-Type Platforms,” ASME JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, Vol. 118.
7.
Bea, R. G., Loch, K. J., and Young, P. L., 1997a, “Capacities of Template-Type Platforms in the Gulf of Mexico During Hurricane Andrew,” ASME JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, Vol. 119.
8.
Bea, R. G., Mortazavi, M. M., and Loch, K. J., 1997b, “Evaluation of Storm Loadings on and Capacities of Offshore Platforms,” Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 2, American Society of Civil Engineers, Herndon, VA.
9.
Bea, R. G., Stear, J., Xu, T., and Ramos, R., 1998, “Hurricane Wave Forces on the Decks of Offshore Platforms,” Proceedings, International Symposium Ocean Wave Kinematics, Dynamics and Loads on Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Herndon, VA.
10.
Cox J. W., 1987, Tubular Member Strength Equations for LRFD, Final Report to American Petroleum Inst. PRAC Project 86-55, Dallas, TX.
11.
Der Kiureghian, A., 1994, Structural Reliability, Course Notes, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
12.
Digre, K. A., Puskar, F. J., Irick, J. T., and Krieger, W., 1995, “Modifications to and Applications of the Guidelines for Assessment of Existing Platforms Contained in Section 17 of API RP 2A,” Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 7779, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
13.
Haugen, E. B., 1968, Probabilistic Approaches to Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
14.
Haver, S., 1995, “Uncertainties in Force and Response Estimates,” E&P Forum, The Oil Industry International Exploration & Production Forum, Offshore Structures/Metocean Workshop, E&P Forum Report No. 3.15/229, London, UK.
15.
Heideman, J. C., and Weaver, T. O., 1992, “Static Wave Force Procedure for Platform Design,” Proceedings, Civil Engineering in the Oceans V, College Station, TX, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY.
16.
Heideman, J. C., Santala, M. J., and Ceuellar, R., 1995, “Uncertainty and Bias in Metocean Design Criteria,” E&P Forum, The Oil Industry International Exploration & Production Forum, Offshore Structures/Metocean Workshop, E&P Forum Report No. 3.15/229, London, U.K., Nov.
17.
Liu, P. L., Lin, H. Z., and Der Kiureghian, A., 1989, CALREL User Manual, Report No. UCB/SEMM-89/18, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, CA.
18.
Melchers, R. E., 1988, Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, Ellis Horwood Limited Publishers, Chichester, UK.
19.
Mortazavi, M., and Bea R. G., 1994, ULSLEA, Simplified Nonlinear Analysis for Offshore Structures, Report to Joint Industry-Government Sponsored Project, Marine Technology and Management Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, CA.
20.
Mortazavi, M., and Bea R. G., 1995, Screening Methodologies for Use in Platform Assessments and Requalifications, Final Report to Joint Industry-Government Sponsored Project, Marine Technology and Management Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, CA.
21.
Mortazavi, M., and Bea, R. G., 1997, “Experimental Validation of the Ultimate Limit State Limit Equilibrium Analysis (ULSLEA) with Results from Frame Tests,” Proceedings, 7th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Golden, CO.
22.
Nordal H. et al., 1988, A System Reliability Case Study of an Eight-Leg Jacket Platform, Report No. RMS-3, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.
23.
Petrauskas, C., Finnegan, T. D., Heideman, J. C., Santala, M., Vogel, N., and Berek, G., 1994, “Metocean Criteria/Loads for Use in Assessment of Existing Offshore Platforms,” Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 7484, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
24.
Stear, J. D., and Bea, R. G., 1997, Using Static Pushover Analysis to Determine the Ultimate Limit States of Gulf of Mexico Steel Template-Type Platforms Subjected to Hurricane Wind and Wave Loads, Report to U.S. Minerals Management Service and Joint Industry Project Sponsors, Marine Technology and Management Group, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, CA.
25.
Stewart, G., Efthymiou, M., and Vugts, J. H., 1988, “Ultimate Strength and Integrity Assessment of Fixed Offshore Platforms,” Proceedings, International Conference on Behavior of Off-Shore Structures, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
26.
Tang W. H., 1988, Offshore Axial Pile Design Reliability, Research Report to American Petroleum Institute, Project PRAC 86-29B, Dallas TX.
27.
Tang W. H., and Gilbert R. B., 1990, Offshore Lateral Pile Design Reliability, Research Report to American Petroleum Institute, Project PRAC 87-29, Dallas, TX.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.