The extreme response of a jackup structure is studied. We consider how design seastate histories can be introduced to reduce the cost of time-domain response analysis. We first identify critical wave characteristics for extreme response prediction. In quasi-static cases, the maximum wave crest height, ηmax, is shown to best explain extreme deck sway. For more flexible structures we introduce a new wave characteristic, SD, based on response spectral concepts from earthquake engineering. Finally, we show how accurate response estimates can require fewer time-domain analyses, provided design seastates are pre-selected to ensure that ηmax or SD is near its average value. With respect to standard Monte-Carlo simulation, these design seastates achieve at least a 50-percent reduction in response variability, and hence at least a fourfold savings in needed simulation cost. These results may lend insight, not only into time-domain simulation, but also into more fundamental questions of jackup behavior. They also suggest that, at least in quasi-static cases, still simpler design wave methods based on ηmax may suffice. We illustrate and evaluate some such design wave methods here (e.g., the “new wave” model and others based on Slepian theory).

1.
Hu, S.-L. J., and Mandato, J. M., 1991, “Design Response Spectra for Offshore Structures,” Proceedings, 1st International Offshore Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE, pp. 270–277.
2.
Karunakaran, D., 1991, “Procedure for Nonlinear Dynamic Response Analysis of Offshore Structures—Both for Extreme and Fatigue Response,” Report STF71 A91016, Sintef Structural Engineering, Trondheim, Norway.
3.
Lo̸seth, R., Mo, O., and Lotsberg, I., 1990, “Probabilistic Analysis of a Jack-Up Platform With Respect to the Ultimate Limit State,” Proceedings, Annual SNAME Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
4.
Leadbetter, M. R., Lindgren, G., and Rootzen, H., 1983, Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
5.
Lutes
L. D.
, and
Wang
J.
,
1991
, “
Simulation of Improved Gaussian Time History
,”
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
, ASCE, Vol.
117
(
1
), pp.
218
224
.
6.
Morrison, D. G., and Leonard, J. S., 1993, “Rational Random Wave Design of Compliant Towers,” Proceedings, 12th International Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Symposium, ASME, Vol. I, pp. 543–548.
7.
Ronold, K., and Winterstein, S. R., 1992, “Stochastic Storm Profiles for Strain Accumulation in Clay,” Proceedings, 11th International Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Symposium, ASME, Vol. II, pp. 1–13.
8.
SNAME, 1991, Guideline for Site-Specific Assessment of Mobile Jack-Up Units, Joint Industry Working Group on Jack-Up Site Assessment Procedures, Tech. and Res. Bulletin 5-5, Society of Naval Architecture Marine Engineers.
9.
Torhaug, R., 1996, “Extreme Response of Non-Linear Ocean Structures: Identification of Minimal Stochastic Wave Input for Time-Domain Simulation,” Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford, CA.
10.
Tromans, P. S., Anaturk, A. H. R., and Hagemeijer, P., 1991, “New Model for the Kinematics of Large Ocean Waves Applications as a Design Wave,” Proceedings, 1st International Offshore Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE, pp. 64–71.
11.
Veletsos, A. S., Hahn, G., and Bordinhao, R., 1983, “Response Spectrum Approach to Design for Waves,” Proceedings, 4th Special Conference on Recent Advances in Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, pp. 295–298.
12.
Winterstein, S. R., and Torhaug, R., 1993, “Estimating Extreme Response of Jackup Structures From Limited Time-Domain Simulation,” Proceedings, 12th International Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Symposium, ASME, Vol. II, pp. 251–258.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.