The objective of this investigation was to provide a detailed evaluation of the heat-affected zone (HAZ) toughness of a high-strength TMCP steel designed for low-temperature applications. The results from both Charpy-vee notch (CVN) and cracktip-opening displacement (CTOD) tests conducted on two straight-walled narrow groove welds, produced at energy inputs of 1.5 and 3.0 kJ/mm, show that significantly lower toughness was exhibited by the grain-coarsened HAZ (GCHAZ) compared with the intercritical HAZ (ICHAZ) region. This is explained based on the overall GCHAZ microstructure, and the initiation mechanism which caused failure. For the particular TMCP steel investigated in this study very good ICHAZ toughness properties were recorded using both HAZ Charpy and CTOD tests. In general, this was attributable to the low hardness, relatively fine ferrite microstructure, and the formation of secondary microphases that were not overly detrimental to the toughness. The lower-bound GCHAZ CTOD results obtained for both welds (KA W-L and KA W-H) did not meet the targeted requirement of δ = 0.07 mm at −50°C. It was found in both welds that low CTOD toughness was associated with the initiation of fracture from nonmetallic inclusions, which were complex oxides containing Ce, La, and S. The sites were located in the subcritical GCHAZ (SCGCHAZ) region in the case of the 1.5 kJ/mm weld and in the GCHAZ for the 3.0 kJ/mm weld. Some variation in CVN toughness was observed at different through-thickness locations. Toughness was lowest for the GCHAZ of the weld deposited at 3.0 kJ/mm and was related to the proportion of GCHAZ being sampled, which was ~55 percent for the bottom compared to 25–30 percent for that of the top location. Recommendations are proposed on the preferred practices and criteria that should be used in establishing guidelines and specifications for evaluating the HAZ toughness of candidate steels for construction of Arctic class ships.

1.
Pisarski
H. G.
, and
Pargeter
R. J.
, “
Fracture Toughness of HAZs in Steels for Offshore Platforms
,”
Metal Construction
, Vol.
18
, pp.
412
417
,
1984
.
2.
Toyoda
M.
,
Minami
F.
,
Ruggieri
C.
,
Bessyo
K.
,
Arimochi
K.
, and
Suzuki
S.
, “
Fracture Toughness Measurement for Fracture Performance Evaluation of Weldments—Significance of Shallow Notch CTOD Test
,”
Welding International
, Vol.
8
(
4
), pp.
279
285
,
1986
.
3.
Denys, R. M., “Wide Plate Fracture Toughness Evaluation of Weld HAZ of Low Carbon Micro-Alloyed Structural Steel Weldments,” Proc. of Int. Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, Winnipeg, Canada, Pergamon Press, eds., W. R. Tyson and B. Mukherjee, pp. 95–106, 1987.
4.
Fairchild D. P., Theisen, J. D., and Royer, C. P., “Philosophy and Technique for Assessing HAZ Toughness of Structural Steels Prior to Steel Production,” Proc. of Seventh Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Houston, TX, pp. 199–206, 1988.
5.
Gianetto, J. A., McGrath, J. T., Smith, N. J. G., and Orr, R. F., “An Evaluation of the Notch Toughness and Dynamic Tear Fracture Resistance of High Strength HY80 and HSLA80 Weldments,” Conf. Proc. on Int. Trends in Welding Science and Technology, ASM International, Gatlinburg, eds., S. A. David and J. M. Vitek, pp. 805–809, 1989.
6.
Webster
S. E.
, and
Bateson
P. H.
, “
Significance of Local Brittle Zones to Structural Behaviour
,”
Mat. Sci and Tech.
, Vol.
9
, pp.
83
90
,
1993
.
7.
Pisarski, H. G., “HAZ Toughness Evaluation,” Proc. Int. Conf. on The Metallurgy, Welding, and Qualification of Microalloyed (HSLA) Steel Weldments, Houston, TX, AWS, eds., J. T. Hickey, D. G. Howden, and M. D. Randell, pp. 351–382, 1990.
8.
Aihara, S., and Okamoto, K., “Influence of Local Brittle Zone on HAZ Toughness of TMCP Steels,” Proc. Int. Conf. on the Metallurgy, Welding, and Qualification of Microalloyed (HSLA) Steel Weldments, Houston, TX, AWS, eds., J. T. Hickey, D. G. Howden, and M. D. Randell, pp. 402–426, 1990.
9.
“Guide to Weldability and Metallurgy of Welding of Steels Processed by Thermomechanical Rolling or by Accelerated Cooling,” International Institute of Welding, Welding in the World, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 34–65, 1994.
10.
Loureiro
A. J. R.
, and
Fernandes
A. A.
, “
Toughness of CGHAZ of Welds in Q&T Steels
,” AWS,
Welding Journal
, Vol.
73
, No.
9
, pp.
225s–232s
225s–232s
,
1994
.
11.
Bowker, J. T., McGrath, J. T., Gianetto, J. A., and Letts, M. W., “Microstructure and Notch Toughness of Simulated HAZ Regions in HSLA80 Steel,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Weld Failures, The Welding Institute, London, pp. 10-1–10-12, 1988.
12.
Linton, V. M., and King, J. E., “The Effect of Heat Input on the Heat Affected Zone Toughness of Two Offshore Steels,” Conf. Proc. on Int. Trends in Welding Science and Technology, ASM International, Gatlinburg, eds., S. A. David and J. M. Vitek, pp. 545–549, 1992.
13.
Davis
C. L.
, and
King
J. E.
, “
Effect of Cooling Rate on Intercritically Reheated Microstructure and Toughness in High Strength Low Alloy Steel
,”
Mat. Sci and Tech.
, Vol.
9
, pp.
8
15
,
1993
.
14.
Gianetto, J. A., Bowker, J. T., and Letts, M. W., “Evaluation of Heat Affected Zone Microstructure/Mechanical Properties of HY-100 Grade Steels,” Metals Technology Laboratories, Ottawa, Canada, MTL-93-20(TR-R), Report DREA CR/93/451, 1993.
15.
Rak, I. F., Kocak, M., Gliha, V., and Petrovski, B. L., “HAZ Fracture Properties of Ti-Microalloyed Offshore Steel in as-Welded and Simulated Condition,” Proc. of 13th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Houston, TX, ASME, Vol. III, pp. 267–276, 1994.
16.
Tyson
W. R.
,
Bouchard
R.
,
Malik
L.
,
Tomlin
M.
, and
McCallum
J.
, “
Steel Selection for Arctic Ships: Effects of Elevated Loading Rate on Toughness
,”
Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly
, Vol.
32
, No.
3
, pp.
261
265
,
1993
.
17.
Sandwell Swan Wooster, “Preferential Corrosion and Mechanical Characteristics Associated with the Welding of High Grade Materials for Arctic Service,” Contract Project 112266, Versatile Pacific Shipyards Inc. North Vancouver, B. C., Aug. 1990.
18.
Canadian Standard Association: CAN/CSA-S473-92 Steel Structures, Offshore Structures, A National Standard of Canada, June 1992.
19.
Braid, J. E. M., and Tyson, W. R., “Fracture Toughness Considerations for Arctic and Cold Marine Structures,” Proc. Int. Conf. on the Metallurgy, Welding, and Qualification of Microalloyed (HSLA) Steel Weldments, Houston, TX, AWS, eds., J. T. Hickey, D. G. Howden, and M. D. Randell, pp. 427–447, 1990.
20.
British Standards Institution, PD6493: 1980. Guidance on Some Methods for the Derivation of Acceptance Levels for Defects in Fusion Welded Joints, London, 1980.
21.
ASTME 1290-93. Standard Test Method for Crack-Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) Fracture Toughness Measurement, 1993.
22.
Canadian Standard Association: Supplement No. 1-M1989 to CAN/CSA-W47.1-1983 Certification of Companies for Fusion Welding of Steel Structures, Steel Fixed Offshore Structures, Welding, Nov. 1989.
23.
Fairchild
D. P.
,
Bangaru
N. V.
,
Koo
J. V.
,
Harrison
P. L.
, and
Ozekcin
A.
, “
A Study Concerning Intercritical HAZ Microstructure and Toughness in HSLA Steels
,” AWS,
Welding Journal
, Vol.
70
, No.
12
, pp.
321s–329s
321s–329s
,
1991
.
24.
Schwalbe, K-H., and Kocak, M., “Fracture Mechanics of Weldments: Properties and Applications to Components,” Proc. of 3rd Int. Conf on Trends in Welding Science and Technology, Gatlinburg, ASM International, eds., S. A. David and J. M. Vitek, pp. 479–494, 1992.
25.
Shiga, C., and Saito, Y., “Toughness improvement in HAZ of HSLA steels by TMCP in Japan,” Proc. of the First United States—Japan Symposium on Advances in Welding Metallurgy, American Welding Society, Japan Welding Society, and The Japan Welding Engineering Society, pp. 177–205, 1990.
26.
Bateson, P. H., Harrison, P. L., Martin, I. W., and Kapoor, S., “Development of TMCR Steel for Offshore Structures,” Proc. of Structural Materials in Marine Environments, London, UK., The Institute of Metals, pp. 226–243, 1994.
27.
Suzuki, S., Bessyo, K., Toyoda, M., and Minami, F., “Property Distribution Map to Understand HAZ CTOD Toughness,” Proc. of 12th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Glasgow, Scotland, ASME, Vol. IIIB, pp. 753–760, 1993.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.