During the past three decades, an immense amount of effort has been devoted to development of sophisticated computer programs to enable the assessment of storm wind, wave, and current loadings and the ultimate limit state capacity characteristics of conventional, pile-supported, template-type offshore platforms (Billington et al, 1993; Frieze, 1993; Hellan et al., 1993, 1994). These programs require high degrees of expertise to operate properly, are expensive to purchase and maintain, and require large amounts of manpower and time to complete the analyses. Due to the sophistication of these programs, experience has shown that it is easy to make mistakes that are difficult to detect and that can have significant influences on the results. This paper summarizes the second phase of development and verification of simplified procedures to evaluate environmental loadings and ultimate limit state lateral loading capacities of template-type platforms. Reasonable simplifications and high degrees of user friendliness have been employed in development of the software to reduce the engineering effort, expertise, and costs associated with the analyses. The computer program that has been developed to perform the simplified analyses has been identified as ULSLEA (ultimate limit state limit equilibrium analyses) (Mortazavi and Bea, 1994).

1.
API, 1993, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Load and Resistance Factor Design, RP 2A-LRFD, First Edition, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, July.
2.
API, 1994, API RP 2A-WSD 20th Edition, Draft Section 17.0, Assessment of Existing Platforms, American Petroleum Institute, Houston, TX, Nov.
3.
Bea, R. G., 1984, “Dynamic Response of Marine Foundations,” Proceedings of the Ocean Structural Dynamics Symposium, Oregon State University, Coprvallis, OR, September 11–13.
4.
Bea, R. G., and DesRoches, R., 1993, “Development and Verification of A Simplified Procedure to Estimate The Capacity of Template-Type Platforms,” Proceedings, 5th International Symposium Integrity of Offshore Structures, eds., D. Faulkner et al., Emas Scientific Publications, pp. 129–148.
5.
Bea, R. G., and Craig, M. J. K., 1993, “Developments in the Assessment and Requalification of Offshore Platforms,” Proceedings Offshore Technology Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX, OTC 7138.
6.
Bea, R. G., 1995, “Development and Verification of A Simplified Method to Evaluate Storm Loadings on and Capacities of Steel, Template-Type Platforms,” ASME Proceedings, Energy and Environmental Expo, Houston, TX, Jan.
7.
Bea, R. G., Loch, K., and Young, P., 1996, “Capacities of Template-Type Platforms in the Gulf of Mexico During Hurricane Andrew,” submitted for publication in ASME JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, Oct.
8.
Billington, C. J., Bolt, H. M., and Ward, J. K., 1993, “Reserve, Residual and Ultimate Strength Analysis of Offshore Structures: State of the Art Review,” Proceedings, Third International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Singapore, June, pp. 125–133.
9.
Det Norske Veritas, 1993, WACJAC, Wave and Current Loads on Fixed Rigid Frame Structures, SESAM AS, Version 5.4-02, Oslo, Norway.
10.
Fenton
J. D.
,
1985
, “
A Fifth-Order Stokes Theory for Steady Waves
,”
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering
, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.
111
, No.
2
, pp.
216
234
.
11.
Focht, J. A., and Kraft, L. M., 1986, “Axial Performance and Capacity of Piles,” Planning and Design of Fixed Offshore Platforms, eds., B. McClelland and Reifel, M. D., pp. 763–801.
12.
Frieze, P. A., 1993, “Determination of Platform Overall Reliability Given Reserve Strength Ratio (RSR),” Report to Health and Safety Executive, Report PAFA 012/1, London, U.K., Apr.
13.
Hellan, O., et al., 1993, “Nonlinear Re-Assessment of Jacket Structures Under Extreme Storm Cyclic Loading,” ASME Proceedings, Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, Glasgow, Scotland.
14.
Hellan, O., et al., 1994, “Use of Nonlinear Pushover Analyses in Ultimate Limit State Design and Integrity Assessment of Jacket Structures,” Proceedings, Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Houston, TX.
15.
Imm, G. R., O’Connor, J. M., Light, J. M., and Stahl, B., 1994, “South Timbalier 161A: A Successful Application Platform Requalification Technology,” Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX, OTC 7471.
16.
Loh, J. T., 1993, “Ultimate Strength of Dented Tubular Steel Members,” Proceedings, 3rd International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Singapore.
17.
McDonald, D. T., Bando, K., Bea, R. G., and Sobey, R. J., 1990, “Near Surface Wave Forces on Horizontal Members and Decks off Offshore Platforms,” Final Report, Coastal and Hydraulic Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, CA, Dec.
18.
Mortazavi, M., and Bea, R. G., 1994, “ULSLEA, Simplified Nonlinear Analysis for Offshore Structures,” Report to Joint Industry-Government Sponsored Project, Marine Technology Development Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA, June.
19.
PMB Engineering Inc., 1994, “Benchmark Analysis, Trial Application of the API RP 2A-WSD Draft Section 17,” Report to Minerals Management Services and Trials JIP Participants, Sept.
20.
Preston, D., 1994, “An Assessment of the Environmental Loads on the Ocean Motion International Platform,” Master of Engineering thesis, Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
21.
Skjelbreia, L., and Hendrickson, J., 1961, “Fifth Order Gravity Wave Theory,” Proceedings, 7th Conference of Coastal Engineering, pp. 184–196.
22.
Tang, W. H., 1990, “Offshore Lateral Pile Design Reliability,” Report to the American Petroleum Institute, Dallas, TX.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.