The full life cycle approach to risk acceptance is proposed as the basis for establishing of acceptance criteria for the temporary phases, i.e., onshore and offshore construction as well as installation. The background for such criteria is discussed, as well as evaluations that may be used to formulate risk acceptance criteria in the construction and installation phases. The criteria are focused on personnel safety. Environmental spill protection and protection of assets are also addressed, but less extensively. FAR or AIR values are used to express tolerable personnel safety, whereas the acceptability of exposure of the investment is expressed in terms of acceptable probabilities of accidents with significant effect on the project time schedule, i.e., the possibility to delay significantly the start-up of the production phase. The approach is based on an ALARP principle.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Acceptance criteria, Risk, Safety, Accidents, Construction, Cycles, Delays, Offshore structures, Probability
1.
DNV, Worldwide Offshore Accident Database, 1995, Ho̸vik.
2.
Dovre Safetec AS; 1992, FATAR, Fatal Accident Data Base for Norwegian Continental Shelf.
3.
HSE, 1992a, Safety Case Regulations.
4.
HSE, 1992b, The Tolerability of Risk From Nuclear Power Stations, HMSO.
5.
Kampmann, J et al., 1992, Risk Analysis of the Railway Tunnel Under the Great Belt, Safety in Road and Rail Tunnels, First International Conference, Basel, Switzerland, Nov.
6.
NOS, 1988-1990, Health Statistics, Statistical Yearbook.
7.
NPD, 1991, Risk Analysis Regulations.
8.
Statoil, 1992, Loss of Sleipner A GBS, Final Report (in Norwegian), Report 8, April 4.
9.
Vincentsen, L. J. and Spangenberg, S., 1990, Safety Management System for the Great Belt Link, Strait Crossings, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.