Abstract

Advanced fuels and fuel cycles are important for the current and next generation of advanced reactors, small modular reactors, and microreactors, in order to maximize the utilization of fissile and fertile nuclear fuel resources, and also to minimize the mass and volume of radioactive waste to be placed into long-term storage. Thorium-based fuels are a potentially attractive option for both advanced fuels and fuel cycles, since neutron irradiation will lead to the conversion of fertile 232Th to fissile 233U. Thus, thorium-based fuels can be used to augment and extend uranium resources. Through work done at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL), Canada has gained extensive experience over more than 50 years of how to fabricate thorium-based fuels. This paper provides an overview of Canada's experience in the fabrication of thorium-based fuels (mainly ThO2, (Th,U)O2, and (Th,Pu)O2) at CNL at its Chalk River Laboratories (CRL). Thoria (ThO2) fuel pellet fabrication uses processes and equipment similar to that of uranium dioxide (UO2) fuel pellet fabrication. However, since thorium lacks a fissile isotope, most ThO2 pellet fabrication processes must include a step to add a fissile component, such as enriched UO2, plutonium dioxide (PuO2), or U-233 in the form of 233UO2. Along with a review of the fuel fabrication effort that has taken place at CNL, the potential impact that CNL's extensive experience with thoria fabrication could have on the future Canadian nuclear energy landscape is also discussed.

1 Introduction

1.1 Background.

Advanced nuclear fuels and fuel cycles for conventional reactors (such as Gen-III+) and other reactor types, including Gen-IV, small modular reactors (SMRs), microreactors, and other types of advanced reactors (AR's) are important for ensuring long-term nuclear energy security and sustainability. Thorium-based fuels are an example of an “advanced fuel”, which are of interest due to the large energy resource potential of thorium (thorium is nearly 3 to 4 times as abundant as uranium [1,2]). As a fertile fuel, thorium can be used to augment and extend uranium resources, and to help maximize nuclear fuel resource utilization through conversion by neutron absorption of fertile 232Th to fissile 233U.

Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL), formerly Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL), Chalk River Laboratories (CRL) has over 50 years of experience in fabrication and irradiation testing of various fuels made with thoria (thorium dioxide, ThO2), which includes extensive experience in fuel pellet fabrication [3].

Thoria, as well as its solid solutions with uranium dioxide and plutonium dioxide (PuO2), presents a fluorite crystal structure, similar to urania (uranium dioxide, UO2). This structure has proven to have excellent resistance to neutron and fission fragment damage [4].

Pure ThO2 pellets can be sintered in any atmosphere (oxidizing, reducing, or inert), as thorium has one main practical oxidation state (IV) and powder oxidation/reduction is not usually possible. It is known and recognized that thorium also has a +3 oxidation sate, although it results in a very narrow region of stability for hypo-stoichiometric thoria [5]. ThO2 fuel pellet fabrication uses similar processes and equipment to that of UO2 fuel fabrication. The production of high density ThO2 pellets mainly depends on the particle size distribution, morphology, and sinterability of the starting powder.

Since thorium lacks a fissile isotope, most ThO2 pellet fabrication processes include a step to add a fissile component, such as enriched UO2, PuO2, or 233U in the form of 233UO2. Typically, there are two methods of combining ThO2 with a fissile component: solution blending or mechanical mixing. Solution blending produces a uniform distribution and, if the fissile component can be added during the ThO2 powder production stage, this method is preferred. Mechanical mixing can be achieved by a number of standard processes, including low intensity blending and high intensity mixing or comilling. Similar to the fabrication of Mixed Oxide ((U,Pu)O2, MOX) fuel, the degree of dispersion of the fissile component into the ThO2 matrix is a function of the intensity of the mixing method. For example, low-intensity methods produce heterogeneous powder mixtures and, hence, heterogeneous sintered pellets. This result is generally considered undesirable from a fuel performance perspective. In contrast, if the high intensity mixing method is adequate, it can produce a solid solution of ThO2 and the fissile additive in the sintered pellet. Over the last 50 years, CNL, from now on referred to solely as CNL, has worked toward developing improved manufacturing and fabrication methods, processes, and procedures to make high-quality thoria pellets that could be used for advanced fuels and fuel cycles in current generation, and next-generation advanced reactors (ARs), small modular reactors (SMRs), and perhaps also microreactors.

1.2 Motivation.

As an alternative fertile nuclear fuel, thorium holds great energy potential. Thorium is three to five times as abundant as uranium [1,2], and as a fertile fuel, it can be used to breed fissile 233U through neutron capture (n + 232Th → 233Th (22.3-minute half-life) → 233 Pa (26.9-day half-life) → 233U). While thorium-based fuels can be used in any reactor technology, the use of the (Th,233U) fuel cycle is special in that it can also be used to achieve high conversion ratios and even net breeding in optimized cores in a thermal spectrum reactor, due to the high neutron reproduction factor for the fissile isotope 233U (η∼2.29) in the thermal neutron energy spectrum. Thus, by conversion from fertile 232Th to fissile 233U, thorium-based fuels can be used to augment and extend uranium resources, which rely upon naturally-occurring fissile 235U (0.711 wt. % 235U/U) and fertile 238U (99.289 wt. % 238U/U). Thorium-based fuels can also be used to consume existing stockpiles of plutonium separated from spent light water reactor UO2 fuel (LWR) in the form of (Th,Pu) fuel mixtures, such as (Th,Pu)O2 [6,7]. This approach can also provide an effective pathway for the disposition/destruction of plutonium from other sources (such as weapons-grade plutonium), akin to the Parallex program between the USA, Russia, and Canada during the mid-1990 s [8].

Since fertile 232Th is 6 nucleons lighter than fertile 238U, the production of heavier radioactive minor actinides, such as isotopes of Americium (241Am,243Am) and Curium (244 Cm, 246 Cm, 248 Cm, and others) in thorium-based fuels is highly reduced, which is beneficial for minimizing potential long-term radioactive waste liability issues associated with high-burnup fuel. In the last 20 years, extensive research has been performed at CNL [9] to evaluate the potential of thorium-based fuels in pressure tube heavy water reactors (PT-HWRs) [1020] and other reactor technologies, including fast spectrum systems [21], and various SMR technologies [2224]. Regardless of the reactor technology or fuel cycle chosen, the fabrication of thorium-based fuels that can achieve high burnup levels (30 MWd/kg to 60 MWd/kg) while maintaining excellent fuel performance with fission product retention, good thermal conductivity, and structural integrity is a key issue, and one that CNL has investigated for more than 50 years.

1.3 Objectives.

This review paper provides an overview of Canada's contributions to the investigation of the fabrication of thoria-based fuels, primarily through work done at CNL. Importantly, a comprehensive discussion on the various methods for fabricating (Th,U)O2 fuel is presented. The intent of this discussion is to highlight CNL's capabilities within the fuel fabrication discipline to fabricate, characterize, and assess advanced fuels for the potential use in different AR and SMR technologies of interest for Canada. The contents of this review will also reiterate CNL's ability to provide guidance and subject matter expertise to both governmental and international organizations on the merits and issues of different reactor technologies and their associated fuels and fuel cycles.

The focus of this review paper is on the fabrication and manufacturing of thoria-based fuels. For more information and details on CNL's previous experience with the irradiation-testing and irradiation performance characteristics of thorium-based fuels (such as irradiations in the National Research Universal (NRU) reactor), the reader is encouraged to see discussions in Refs. [25] and [26].

This paper is structured as follows: the production methods of (Th,U)O2 fuel based on solution blending are discussed in Sec. 2. Section 3 discusses various mechanical mixing techniques used to prepare (Th,U)O2 material. Section 4 outlines recent fuel fabrication and pre-irradiation characterization efforts undertaken at CNL to investigate how fuel fabrication methods impact fuel quality, which can subsequently have an effect on fuel performance, including defective fuel behavior. It is well-recognized and understood that fuel fabrication methods can affect the grain size of ceramic (thoria) fuel particles and other fuel pellet design characteristics, which will subsequent impact the irradiation performance of such fuels, as discussed in related previous research by CNL scientists [26].

2 Solution Blending

2.1 Sol-Gel Processes.

The Solution-Gelation (Sol-Gel) process, also called hydrothermal denitration and based on a method developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) [27], was used in the mid-1970 s at AECL's Whiteshell Laboratories (WL) to produce (Th,U)O2 fuel in two forms, microspheres and extrusion clays. It was also used at AECL-CRL in the early to mid-1980 s to produce pure ThO2. A Sol is a liquid containing solid particles that are evenly distributed and stably suspended in the liquid. The Sol may be transformed to a Gel by the removal of interparticle repulsive forces [28].

Figure 1 depicts the Sol-Gel process used to prepare dense (Th,U)O2 fuel [2830]. In the first process step, the Sol was prepared by exposing a thorium nitrate solution (Th(NO3)4·4H2O) to steam at various temperatures in a rotary calciner. The thorium nitrate undergoes an endothermic reaction in steam and decomposes to submicron ThO2 powder and nitric acid (HNO3), which is required for the Sol-Gel process as it results in the ThO2 being readily dispersed in dilute HNO3. From here, the Sol was prepared by blending ThO2 in sufficient uranyl nitrate (UO2(NO3)2) solution to give the desired U/Th ratio. At this stage, the UO2(NO3)2 solution contains excess nitric acid to stabilize the ThO2 particles as a Sol. The pH was adjusted to 3.9 using ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH), to convert the uranium to species that adsorb on the ThO2 surface, producing a ThO2-UO3 Sol. The ThO2-UO3 Sol can then be used to produce either fuel microspheres or clays.

Fig. 1
Sol–gel process used to prepare dense (Th,U)O2 fuel (adapted from Refs. Matthews [28], Turner [29], and Onofrei [30])
Fig. 1
Sol–gel process used to prepare dense (Th,U)O2 fuel (adapted from Refs. Matthews [28], Turner [29], and Onofrei [30])
Close modal

One of the most important variables of the Sol-Gel process is the viscosity of the Sol, which is a function of the uranium concentration, pH, density, and aging time (as with time, continued chemical reactions lead to increased crosslinking during gelation, which can increase the modulus and viscosity of the gel). For example, increases in pH and temperature of U(VI) solutions enhance adsorption of uranium on ThO2 through hydrolysis of U(VI) [31]. At a pH of about 3.0, the Sols behave as Newtonian fluids, whilst at higher pH values, concentrated Sols transform into thixotropic Gels. Overall, the adsorption of uranium by ThO2 increases when the viscosity of the ThO2-UO3 sols increases.

2.1.1 Microsphere Preparation.

Once the ThO2-UO3 Sol is prepared, it can then be used to prepare fuel microspheres [3234]. Microspheres were formed by forcing the ThO2-UO3 Sol through a nozzle into an organic liquid (2-ethyl hexanol). Under specific conditions, the surface tension of the aqueous Sol in the immiscible organic liquid forms microspheres. Droplets are formed by pumping the ThO2-UO3 Sol through vibrating nozzles of various diameters. Droplet size strongly depended on the nozzle diameter. Table 1 shows the effect of the nozzle diameter on the sintered microsphere size.

Table 1

Effect of the nozzle diameter on the sintered microsphere size (adapted from Matthews and Swanson [32])

Nozzle diameter (mm)Range of sintered sphere size (μm)
1.0600–750
1.3650–800
1.5700–850
1.8850–1000
1.9>1000
Nozzle diameter (mm)Range of sintered sphere size (μm)
1.0600–750
1.3650–800
1.5700–850
1.8850–1000
1.9>1000

A mix of dry Argon (>99 at% Ar, less than 1 at% O2, N2, or H2O) and steam at 220 °C removed water from the Sol producing the Gel. Gelled microspheres of (Th,U)O2 were later dried in a pure, dry Argon atmosphere, and sintered to high density at about 1300 °C. Sintered (Th,U)O2 microspheres presented densities higher than 9.9 g/cm3 and were subsequently vibration-packed into fuel cladding to produce fuel called Spherepac [33].

2.1.2 Clay Extrusion.

The ThO2-UO3 Sol can also be used to prepare clay for fuel extrusion [29,30,33]. After the ThO2-UO3 Sol was prepared, it was mixed with an organic binder (a phenolic resin) and filtered by dry suction. The resulting filter cake (paste) containing from 15 to 24% moisture was then mixed to eliminate local variations in moisture content and extruded in a laboratory-scale hydraulic ram press. The extruded wet slugs were then transferred to a roll rack, cut, dried at 100 °C, and sintered in a reducing atmosphere at 1600 °C. Fuel rods with a density higher than 9.5 g/cm3 were successfully produced during efforts conducted at the AECL-WL. Figure 2 depicts an image of the fuel pellets produced with this method. Figure 3 shows micrographs of the sintered pellets. Note: diameter of fuel pellets is ∼1.21 cm.

Fig. 2
Extruded slugs of (Th,U)O2 sintered at 1600 °C, density of 9.7 g/cm3 (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [30])
Fig. 2
Extruded slugs of (Th,U)O2 sintered at 1600 °C, density of 9.7 g/cm3 (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [30])
Close modal
Fig. 3
Microstructure of extruded (Th,U)O2 slugs sintered at 1600 °C obtained at two denitration temperatures: (a) 475 °C (748 K), (250X magnification), and (b) 600 °C (873 K), (400X magnification) (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [30])
Fig. 3
Microstructure of extruded (Th,U)O2 slugs sintered at 1600 °C obtained at two denitration temperatures: (a) 475 °C (748 K), (250X magnification), and (b) 600 °C (873 K), (400X magnification) (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [30])
Close modal

2.2 Co-Precipitation.

Co-precipitation results in a completely homogeneous mixture of thorium and uranium, since the mixing occurs at an atomic scale. The development of the coprecipitation technique took place during 1979-1981 at AECL-CRL. In this method, a (Th+U) nitrate solution was prepared by mixing uranyl and thorium nitrate solutions [3538]. After reducing the uranium to U(IV), (Th+U) salts were coprecipitated by adding solid oxalic acid ((CO2H)2) to the solution. The precipitated oxalate was then filtered, washed with distilled water, dried, granulated and calcined. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) characterization showed that the (Th+U) coprecipitated particles presented a square platelet geometry, typical of oxalate-derived ThO2, with the mass fraction mean particle size being ∼1.34 μm. This as-produced powder however, exhibited high friction on pressing and severe pellet end-capping was observed. In order to overcome this problem, the powder was agglomerated by wet grinding in a stirred-ball mill.

2.3 Solution Impregnation.

Another technique used by CNL to incorporate the fissile components into ThO2 pellets was solution impregnation. In this technique, pressed green (nonsintered) pellets of pure ThO2 were impregnated by immersing the pellets in enriched UO2(NO3)2 solution, resulting in the green pellet absorbing the UO2(NO3)2 solution [33,39,40]. Following impregnation, the pellets were rinsed and dried with the UO2(NO3)2 remaining in the green pellet. Standard sintering methods resulted in ThO2 pellets having the uranium in solid solution. However, it was found that the uranium was not uniformly distributed within the pellet. Figure 4 depicts images of longitudinal cross section of green ThO2 pellets impregnated for different times. Analysis showed that after 30-40 min of impregnation time, essentially pure water reached the pellet center, since most of the dissolved UO2(NO3)2 was deposited in the outer regions of the ThO2 fuel pellet.

Fig. 4
Longitudinal cross sections of ThO2 pellets (shown in green) imaging Uranium penetration (black/grey color) as a function of impregnation times (min) (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Refs. [33])
Fig. 4
Longitudinal cross sections of ThO2 pellets (shown in green) imaging Uranium penetration (black/grey color) as a function of impregnation times (min) (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Refs. [33])
Close modal

This work indicated that uranium (in oxide form) preferentially bonds with the ThO2 particles on the surface of the fuel pellet, resulting in the retention of the uranium on the periphery of the pellet while pure liquid is drawn to the center through the pores, and interstitial gaps between ThO2 grains. Therefore, this method resulted in fuel pellets being uranium rich in the periphery and pure ThO2 in the center.

The solution impregnation fuel concept is attractive from an irradiation performance standpoint. In this fissile distribution, the initial concentration of fissile material is in the periphery of the pellet and closest to the coolant. Therefore, it can be expected to reduce fuel operating temperature in a similar manner to duplex-type (a heterogeneous dual-annulus fuel pellet in which the inner fuel pellet annulus core has a different fissile content than the outer fuel pellet annulus shell) fuel.

The other attractive feature of this fabrication method, particularly for plutonium addition, is the fact that green pellet fabrication can take place without the use of a glove box, for more convenient manipulation, since the green pellet has low radiotoxicity, and other protocols and procedures can be implemented to ensure adequate radiation safety protection. Subsequent pellet processing operations will need take place in a glove box (since they involve Pu or 233U). This approach greatly reduces the size and complexity of the containment (glove boxes) required for pellet fabrication compared to traditional methods for fissile material addition.

3 Mechanical Mixing

Two key steps of the ThO2-based fuel pellet fabrication process are the addition of the fissile component and the sintering of fuel compacts. Since the 1960s, CNL has established research programs to investigate ThO2-based fuel fabrication processes. Most ThO2 pellet fabrication performed at CNL has involved some type of treatment to the as-received powder to improve its sinterability and/or to add a fissile component. The following is a list of mechanical mixing techniques examined by CNL, as discussed in Ref. [39]

  • Wet attrition milling;

  • Homogenizer (wet);

  • Twin shell blender with an intensifier bar (a high speed rotor) followed by two passes through a high speed blade mill;

  • Tubular mixer;

  • High intensity mixer; and

  • Dry vibration milling (several variations).

3.1 Wet Powder Mixing.

Attrition milling was used in the 1970s to produce (Th,U)O2 pellets for a great number of experiments. The attrition mill consisted of a vertically-oriented pot for mechanically reducing solid particle size by intense agitation of the powder material being milled along with coarse milling media. The powder material can be added, as a slurry (wet), or directly, as dry powder, to the media with CNL pursuing efforts associated with the attrition milling of ThO2 and UO2 in a wet state [38]. This method proved to have a fast throughput and be a very effective method for breaking up UO2 agglomerates. After milling, the milled slurry was poured into a pan and the water was allowed to evaporate. This drying method resulted in the production of very hard dried cakes, which were broken up by forcing them through a standard sieve screen. The resulting granules made a free flowing, final press feed, and green pellets of adequate strength for handling were produced. Sintered densities of about 9.6 g/cm3 were fabricated. Microscopic examination of cut and polished pellet surfaces revealed granular-like structures, indicating that some of the cake granules had not been completely broken up during final pressing and their structure remained in the pellets after sintering. Various granular-like pellet structures were created and investigated using the wet attrition milling method. Figure 5 depicts two examples of granular-like microstructures observed in ThO2-based fuel pellets. Figure 5(a) shows a granular-like microstructure with a very dense and homogeneous structure within the granules, whilst porous (low density) regions were observed between granules. Figure 5(b) shows a granular-like microstructure with dense and homogeneous granules surrounded by very large open pores. Porous regions provide an easy path for fission gasses to escape to the element free volume and simultaneously act as a heat conduction barrier.

Fig. 5
Examples of granular-like pellet microstructures with (a)large, open pores and (b) low density porous regions between the high density granules (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [39])
Fig. 5
Examples of granular-like pellet microstructures with (a)large, open pores and (b) low density porous regions between the high density granules (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [39])
Close modal

(Th,U)O2 pellets were also produced at CNL by wet mixing highly enriched uranium dioxide (HEU-UO2) and ThO2 using a homogenizer. The homogenizer consisted of slotted rings, rotating at very high speed against static rings. The gap between the rings generated intense sheer forces that broke up the powder agglomerates. The HEU-UO2 powder was then added to de-ionized water and dispersed, followed by the addition of ThO2 powder. Following homogenization, a long chain water-soluble flocculant was added. The flocculant functional groups bonded with the powder particles, resulting in rapid powder settling. The bulk of the water above the settled powder was decanted, the remaining sludge was vacuum filtered, and the cakes were oven dried. Softer dried cakes were produced with this method than with the attrition-milling/pan-drying method. The dried cakes were granulated using a screen and the product was fed directly to the final press to produce green pellets. Despite the fact that a high-intensity mixer was used to mix the powder, HEU agglomerates were observed in the green and sintered pellets amongst an otherwise uniform homogeneous microstructure.

3.2 Dry Powder Mixing.

The fabrication process of ThO2-based fuel pellets is similar to the fabrication process of standard UO2 and MOX fuel pellets. The essential steps are milling/blending, granulation and binder addition, cold pelletization, and sintering. These fabrication steps are well understood and the associated process equipment is readily available.

The experience of CNL with ThO2-based pellet fabrication has shown that the sinterability and physical properties, such as particle size distribution and surface area, of the starting powder are some of the most important factors for a successful ThO2-based fuel fabrication process. Although good quality ThO2 powders are readily commercially available, powders from different lots or suppliers do not behave consistently during fuel pellet fabrication. This problem occurs mainly because ceramic grade ThO2 powder is not in high demand and ThO2 powder specifications and production processes have not been developed sufficiently. Consequently, most of the ThO2 powders have required pretreatment in order to achieve the specified high sintered densities.

ThO2 and UO2 or PuO2 are miscible in all proportions. However, solid solutions of these powders are difficult to achieve during the sintering process. Since sintering is a solid-state diffusion process, metal atoms/ions diffuse at a much slower rate than nonmetal atoms/ions [41,42]; therefore, the distance that metal atoms/ions diffuse is limited to a few microns. As a result, the mixing method must be able to produce a well dispersed powder mix, typically at the level of individual micrometer sized particles [39]. Figure 6 depicts a sample flowchart of a ThO2-based fuel pellet fabrication process, including three mixing methods, adapted from Refs. Dimayuga [43] and Dimayuga et al. [44].

Fig. 6
Typical ThO2 fuel pellet fabrication process including three possible powder mixing methods (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Refs. Dimayuga [43] and Dimayuga et al. [44])
Fig. 6
Typical ThO2 fuel pellet fabrication process including three possible powder mixing methods (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Refs. Dimayuga [43] and Dimayuga et al. [44])
Close modal

The microstructure and the fissile component (U or Pu) distribution in ThO2-based fuels strongly depend on the method selected to mix the ThO2 and the fissile component (UO2 or PuO2) powders. CNL has investigated the effect of the dry mixing methods on the quality of the sintered pellets, in terms of the density, microstructure, and the fissile component distribution. In particular, development work has been performed using three different methods and their combinations (Fig. 6).

3.2.1 Low Intensity Blending.

Low intensity blending methods are usually combined with a high intensity method to improve fissile component distribution. This method typically produces pellet microstructures containing nearly pure fissile component (UO2 or PuO2) regions in a ThO2 matrix. In the early to mid-1960 s, (Th,U)O2 pellets were fabricated using a two-stage mixing process to blend the powders. The first stage consisted of a twin shell blender with an intensifier bar (a high speed rotor). This twin shell blender produced a homogeneous powder mixture after 2 h. The second stage consisted of a high-speed blade mill, which was used to break up UO2 agglomerates and increased powder homogeneity. After powder blending, some UO2 agglomerates remained and the pellets produced with this method presented granular-like microstructures [35].

During the 1980s, (Th,Pu)O2 pellets were also produced at AECL-CRL using a Turbula blender to mix ThO2 and PuO2 powders [45]. The Turbula is a low-intensity blending technology that consists of a cylindrical vessel tumbling in modified end over end fashion, similar to a paint shaker. Fuel pellets contained 86.05 wt. % Th and 1.53 wt. % Pu in (Th,Pu)O2.

The produced sintered (Th,Pu)O2 pellets presented an average pellet density of 9.47 g/cm3. Average grain size of sintered pellets was 3–4 μm. Figure 7 depicts an alpha autoradiograph of a sintered pellet. Distinct PuO2 particles were (seen as dark spots in Fig. 7) were found to survive the blending stage and appeared in the sintered microstructure [45].

Fig. 7
Alpha autoradiograph of a (Th,Pu)O2 pellet produced using a low intensity powder blending method (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [45]). Note: the diameter of the fuel pellet is of the order of 1.2 cm.
Fig. 7
Alpha autoradiograph of a (Th,Pu)O2 pellet produced using a low intensity powder blending method (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [45]). Note: the diameter of the fuel pellet is of the order of 1.2 cm.
Close modal

The fissile plutonium concentration in the fuel (the dark spots) was macroscopically uniform or relatively homogeneous, although at a more microscopic level (over the length scale of ∼1 mm), it was more heterogeneous. Qualitatively, from a practical perspective on the length scale of the MOX fuel pellet (∼1.2 cm), the PuO2 is mixed relatively well with the ThO2. It is expected that very fine mixing of the PuO2 and ThO2 grains to create a more homogeneous, fine-grain structure in the fuel pellet will help reduce fission gas release (FGR) under irradiation, as discussed by Barry in Ref. [26].

3.2.2 High Intensity Blending With a Master Mix.

Another method used at CNL involved the use of two types of high intensity mixers to blend ThO2 and the fissile component (UO2 or PuO2) powders. First, a high-intensity vibratory mill was used to comill the powders and prepare a high-fissile additive concentration (about 30 wt. %) Master Mix. This method reduced the size of any large powder particles and broke up any agglomerated fissile component powder due to the high intensity milling. The final desired fissile component concentration was achieved by blending an appropriate amount of Master Mix with ThO2 powder using either a high or a low intensity blender. The high intensity blender consisted of a cylindrical stainless steel vessel rotating perpendicularly to the cylindrical axis. Intensifier blades rotating at high speed protrude into the mixing vessel through the axis of rotation, breaking up the agglomerated powder upon impact. This kind of powder blending typically results in a sintered pellet microstructure in which areas of a homogenous distribution of PuO2 particles within the Master Mix are contained in the ThO2 matrix. This result occurs because the high-intensity blending method employed to combine the Master Mix with the ThO2 powder may not break up the agglomerated hard Master Mix.

3.2.3 Powder Co-Milling.

A large part of the ThO2-based fuel development work at CNL has focused on comilling ThO2 powder with the fissile additive (UO2 or PuO2). Milling is an extremely high-energy process that is capable of breaking up agglomerated powder, as well as large individual powder particles. In comilling, both ThO2 and fissile powders are added simultaneously to the vessel containing a milling media. The milling-media/powder mixture is intensely agitated by a high-speed electric motor connected to an off-center weight that creates high-frequency, low-amplitude vibrations. Colliding milling media breaks up powder particles and agglomerated powder and generates a homogenous powder mix.

(Th,U)O2 pellets of various compositions were fabricated at AECL-CRL in the 1960s using a two stage milling process [46]. The powders were dry blended with Sterotex powder and then dry ball-milled for 2 h in porcelain pots with porcelain balls. The resulting powder mix was then forced to pass twice through a laboratory swing hammer mill. The uniformity of mixing was confirmed by gamma (γ)-spectrometry of powder aliquots. The milled powder mixtures were prepressed, granulated, and pressed into green pellets at a pressure of about ∼310 MPa. Green pellets were sintered in a reducing atmosphere of nitrogen-hydrogen (N2-H2) gas for approximately 3 h. The results showed that the average density of sintered pellets decreased from 9.61 to 9.36 g/cm3, as a function of the uranium concentration. The average grain size for all compositions lay in the range of 13 to 15 μm.

In the early to mid-1980 s, (Th,Pu,)O2 pellets were fabricated at CNL using a dry vibration comilling method composed of a hardened tool steel vessel containing two tungsten carbide balls as the milling media [47]. Compaction was in a single-ended steel die at a pressure of 2250 kg/cm2. Typical green pellet density was of the order of 7 g/cm3. Sintering was conducted at high temperature in a reducing atmosphere of argon-hydrogen (Ar-H2) gas for approximately 2 h. Average sintered pellet density was about 9.64 g/cm3. Although a solid solution was not observed, an even distribution of PuO2 particles in a ThO2 matrix was achieved.

Recently, (Th,U)O2 pellets were produced by dry comilling ThO2 and HEU UO2 powders using a vibratory mill [48]. The milled product was fed directly to a final press to produce green pellets that were sintered at high temperature. Sintered pellets presented a very high theoretical density (about 98.7%). Figure 8 depicts a micrograph of a typical sintered pellet microstructure. Ceramography (the examination and evaluation of ceramic microstructures) of sintered pellets revealed uniform grain-like microstructures with minimal porosity and no residual granules, as well as an even uranium distribution in the ThO2 matrix. The average grain size was 6–8 μm.

Fig. 8
Typical (a) porosity and (b) microstructure of (Th,U)O2 fuel pellets produced using a powder co-milling method (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [48])
Fig. 8
Typical (a) porosity and (b) microstructure of (Th,U)O2 fuel pellets produced using a powder co-milling method (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [48])
Close modal

4 Recent Atomic Energy of Canada Limited/Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Thoria Fuel Fabrication Development Activities

Most recently, CNL's Thoria Roadmap Project conducted a review of science and technology (S&T) requirements to support water-cooled reactor designs incorporating cylindrically-clad ceramic fuel pellets.

As part of this project, CNL conducted a number of ThO2-based pellet fabrication trials using dry vibration milling of pure ThO2, ThO2-UO2 and ThO2-PuO2 powders. Thorium-based simulated high-burnup nuclear FUEL (SIMFUEL) fabrication experiments were conducted to estimate thermal properties. Thorium-based SIMFUEL was fabricated using UO2 with varying uranium content. Thermal conductivity determination of the SIMFUEL pellets was conducted at both the Institute for Transuranium Elements (ITU) in Karlsruhe, Germany (now Joint Research Center (JRC) -Karlsruhe)) and CNL [49].

Fabrication experiments of pure ThO2 and ThO2-PuO2 fuel pellets were also conducted. The fabrication trials sought to produce a high pellet density and optimal microstructure in terms of grain size and uranium or plutonium homogeneity. The following subsections present two recent experiments performed to evaluate the effect of fabrication parameters on the quality of the fuel.

4.1 Effects of Starting Powder in ThO2 Fuel Fabrication.

A series of fabrication experiments were performed to evaluate the effect of the morphology and particle size distribution of ThO2 powder on the pellet density and microstructure. ThO2 powder with 99.99% purity was acquired from Rone-Poulenc Inc. The ThO2 powder was milled in a vibratory mill using zirconia (ZrO2) cylinders as milling media. Milled ThO2 powder samples with different particle size distributions were produced using 1-hour, 2-hour, 3-hour and 4-hour milling times.

The as-received ThO2 fuel pellets were produced following a conventional fuel fabrication process of pre-pressing, granulating, final pressing, and sintering. Fuel pellets produced with milled ThO2 powder were fabricated using only final pressing and sintering.

Figure 9 shows SEM images of as-received (a) and 3-hour milled (b) powder samples, along with their semilog plots of the particle size distribution and the corresponding fitting to a series of Gaussian functions. A plate-like morphology was observed in the as-received ThO2 powder (Fig. 9(a)).

Fig. 9
SEM images of particle size analysis: (a) as-received powder and (b) 3-hour milled powder. Semi-log plots of the particle and Gaussian fitted particle size distributions are shown on the right.
Fig. 9
SEM images of particle size analysis: (a) as-received powder and (b) 3-hour milled powder. Semi-log plots of the particle and Gaussian fitted particle size distributions are shown on the right.
Close modal

Powder properties, such as average particle size, specific surface area, and grain size, have been shown to influence the sinterability of powder [50]. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) analysis shows a typical log-normal particle size distribution with an average particle size of 9.07 μm and standard deviation of 5.54 μm. A Gaussian peak separation fit shows three overlapped distributions centered at 3.5, 8.8 and 15.2 μm with areas of 4, 34 and 62%, , respectively. The 3-hour milled powder (Fig. 9(b)) shows a log-normal bi-modal particle size distribution typical of one-stage milling processes, with a submicron and micron distribution. Gaussian fittings of the 3-hour milled powder particle analysis reveal that the peak corresponding to the micron size distribution can be further decomposed in two overlapped distributions. Table 2 shows the average and standard deviation of the particle size distributions determined by DLS along with the Gaussian fitting peak parameters. No significant changes to the particle size distribution were observed between 1-hour and 2-hour milling times. The micron peak became less sharp and wider as a function of milling time. The centers of the overlapped peaks show that the micron particle distribution is composed of two distributions with averages of about 2 and 4 μm. While the average of the second overlapped peak remained constant at 2 μm, the average of the third peak increased to about 8 and 9 μm, for 3 h and 4 h of milling time, respectively. This increase might be due to the agglomeration of fine particles. Fine powders tend to form agglomerated masses due to van der Waals and electrostatic forces. Figure 9(b) shows that the 3-hour milled powder sample presents particle agglomerates larger than 10 μm. Although the size of individual particles cannot be easily identified by SEM, a number of particles in the micrograph scale range can be identified as the agglomerates. This result suggests that the ultrasonic time or intensity used to disperse the powder for DLS might be insufficient to disperse these agglomerates during the analysis.

Table 2

Particle size distributions determined by DLS and peak parameters determined by Gaussian fitting

DLSaGaussian fitting
DistributionAverage (μm)Std Dev (μm)PeakCenter (μm)Width (μm)Height (%)Area (μm2)Area (%)
“As-received”9.075.5413.462.341.805.264.18
28.796.005.7543.2334.34
315.189.926.2377.4161.48
Milling time: 1 hour0.931.1410.330.1313.522.2517.91
21.611.443.486.2749.89
33.682.941.104.0532.21
Milling time: 2 hours1.031.4910.300.1114.742.0916.16
21.771.553.366.5350.62
33.963.151.084.2933.22
Milling times: 3 hours0.951.8810.270.1020.292.5219.47
22.091.931.814.3833.81
37.717.100.686.0546.72
Milling times: 4 hours1.22.6310.260.0923.182.5833.20
22.341.680.711.5017.74
38.969.491.1013.0749.06
DLSaGaussian fitting
DistributionAverage (μm)Std Dev (μm)PeakCenter (μm)Width (μm)Height (%)Area (μm2)Area (%)
“As-received”9.075.5413.462.341.805.264.18
28.796.005.7543.2334.34
315.189.926.2377.4161.48
Milling time: 1 hour0.931.1410.330.1313.522.2517.91
21.611.443.486.2749.89
33.682.941.104.0532.21
Milling time: 2 hours1.031.4910.300.1114.742.0916.16
21.771.553.366.5350.62
33.963.151.084.2933.22
Milling times: 3 hours0.951.8810.270.1020.292.5219.47
22.091.931.814.3833.81
37.717.100.686.0546.72
Milling times: 4 hours1.22.6310.260.0923.182.5833.20
22.341.680.711.5017.74
38.969.491.1013.0749.06
a

DLS = dynamic light scattering

The average submicron particle size was about 0.3 μm for the four different milling times. The percent under the curve of the submicron particle distribution remained almost constant (about 18%) for 1-hour, 2-hour and 3-hour milling times and then increased to about 33% for 4 h of milling time. This result brings to question the effect of the milling time on the integrity of the milling media. As longer milling times favor the removal of surface material of the milling media by self-abrasion, this might eventually provide erroneous results on the particle size distribution measurements.

Figure 10 shows the powder average particle size and the pellet green density and immersion density as a function of the powder milling time. Figure 11 depicts the open, closed, and total porosity as a function of the powder milling time. In these figures, values at zero hours correspond to the values obtained for pellets produced with as-received powder. Error bars were evaluated as ± 1 standard error.

Fig. 10
Green and sintered pellet density and powder average particle size as a function of milling time (Color version online.)
Fig. 10
Green and sintered pellet density and powder average particle size as a function of milling time (Color version online.)
Close modal
Fig. 11
Pellet porosity as a function of milling time
Fig. 11
Pellet porosity as a function of milling time
Close modal

The highest sintered densities were achieved when 1-hour and 2-hour milled powders were used. Sintered densities slightly decreased when 3-hour and 4-hour milled powders were used. The lowest average sintered density (about 9.07 g/cm3) was produced when as-received powder was used as starting material. These low sintered density values may be associated with the morphology (shape and particle size distribution) as well as low surface area of the as-received powder. Irregularities of plate-like particles prevent particle mobility, producing gaps between particles and creating large open voids during pellet pressing in the as-received powder (Fig. 12). When milled powder was used, however, compacts with relatively higher green densities (compared to those achieved with the as-received material) were produced. Pellets produced with 1-hour, 2-hour and 3-hour milled powder presented green densities higher than 6.60 g/cm3 while the green density of pellet produced with as-received powder was only 6.42 g/cm3.

Fig. 12
Ceramographic image of an unetched pellet produced with as-received powder
Fig. 12
Ceramographic image of an unetched pellet produced with as-received powder
Close modal

Figure 12 depicts a ceramographic image of an unetched pellet produced with as-received powder. A typical granular-like microstructure can be observed, showing a number of residual granules that have not homogenized during the final pressing and sintering steps. Significant porosity was observed throughout the pellet. The large amount of interconnected pores may be associated with the number of granular-like regions observed on the pellet micrograph, as well as potentially associated with the plate-like shape of the particles. Particle irregularities hinder particle mobility and the ability to attain maximum compaction (as seen with the granules highlighted in Fig. 12). In this case, it is thought that the plate-like shape (null-sphericity) of particles produce gaps between grains and create large open voids during pellet pressing. Random arrangements of anisometric particles typically have higher porosity and a wider range of pore sizes [51].

Pellets produced with 1-hour and 2-hour milled powder also presented higher green densities than pellets produced with 3-hour and 4-hour milled powder. Milled powder produced with 1-hour and 2-hour milling time exhibited log-normal bi-modal particle size distributions, with well-defined submicron and micron peaks, when analyzed with DLS (also referred to as Particle Size Analysis (PSA). Milled powder produced with 3-hour and 4-hour milling times exhibited log-normal bi-modal particle size distributions, with a well-defined submicron peak but a wider micron peak. It is well known that compacts produced with powders having two distinct particle size distributions exhibit higher compaction factors than compacts produced with powders having only one particle size distribution due to smaller particles being distributed and introduced into the interstices of larger particles, thereby reducing the pore size and the overall porosity of the compacts [51]. Higher compaction factors (Volume before compaction/Volume after compaction), with better particle-to-particle physical contact will help improve pellet densification during the sintering process. The open porosity of pellets produced with milled powder remained almost constant for the four different milling times (Fig. 11). A lower amount of closed porosity was observed in pellets produced with powder having well-defined submicron and micron peaks (1-hour and 2-hour milling time) compared to those produced with milled powder having a wider micron peak (3-hour and 4-hour milling time). This result confirms that both the particle shape and size distribution, play key roles during the densification and grain growth processes of the green pellets.

4.2 Re-Sintering of (Th,233U)O2 Fuel Pellets.

Resintering experiments were performed on (Th,233U)O2 fuel pellets to evaluate the densification behavior of sintered pellets, in terms of pellet density, porosity, dimensions, and grain size distribution. The resintering of manufactured (Th,233U)O2 fuel could potentially occur during reactor operations when fuel pellets, particular those in high-power density fuel elements near the center of the reactor core, are at elevated fuel temperatures. The fresh (Th,233U)O2 pellets were sintered previously at ∼1,700 °C (1,973 K), although they were not sintered long enough to achieve the maximum densification. Typical resintering densification tests of nuclear fuel are performed at or slightly above 1,700 °C (1,973 K) for 24 h, under reducing conditions. These tests are carried out to verify that there will not be excessive in-pile densification of nuclear fuel. Some nuclear fuels exhibit densification as a result of irradiation due to the elimination of small pores in the fuel pellets.

Fuel pellets made of (Th,233U)O2 were manufactured at AECL-CRL in 1986/87 using a mix of 233UO2 and ThO2 powders. The particle size of both powders was below 325 mesh screen (less than 44 μm). The (Th,233U)O2 pellets were fabricated following a conventional fabrication process of blending, prepressing, granulating, final pressing, sintering and grinding. The pellet density was about 9.6 g/cm3, whilst the grain size was approximately 2-3 μm.

Sintered fuel pellets of (Th,233U)O2 were subjected to four resintering cycles of 6 h at a soak temperature of about 1,740 °C (2,013 K). The resintering parameters (sintering gas, heating and cooling rates, and soak temperature and time) used in the four resintering tests remained constant across all runs.

Figure 13 shows the average pellet immersion density and volume shrinkage as a function of resintering time. Error bars were evaluated as ± 1 standard error. The volume shrinkage was evaluated as the percent of the ratio between the pellet volume after each resintering run and the pellet volume prior to resintering. Based on these results, it is clear that the largest shrinkage (the highest densification) occurred during the first 6 h of resintering. After the first resintering run, the average pellet density increased about 1.55%. After the second resintering run, the increase in the average pellet density was negligible (approximately 0.10%). After 24 h of resintering, the average pellet density increased from 9.67 to 9.83 g/cm3 (96.5% to 98.1% Theoretical Density (TD)).

Fig. 13
Average pellet immersion density and volume shrinkage as a function of re-sintering time
Fig. 13
Average pellet immersion density and volume shrinkage as a function of re-sintering time
Close modal

A microstructure characterization study was conducted on selected (Th,233U)O2 fuel pellets. Figure 14 depicts ceramographic images of unetched (Th,233U)O2 pellets taken from different resintering tests. The prior to resintering unetched pellet image, shown in Fig. 14(a), shows a spongy-like pellet surface. A large number of small pores can be seen evenly distributed throughout the pellet, which may be the result of an incomplete grain growth process. Figures 14(b)14(d) show that, as result of the resintering tests, the amount of small pores decreases when compared to the prior to resintering pellet ceramographic image (Fig. 14(a)).

Fig. 14
Microstructure of unetched pellets: (a) prior to re-sintering (polished), (b) re-sintering #1 (6 h), (c)re-sintering #3 (18 h), and (d) re-sintering #4 (24 h). Variation in image appearance (loss in perceived depth-of-field) is due to loss of image quality when reproducing from the original report
Fig. 14
Microstructure of unetched pellets: (a) prior to re-sintering (polished), (b) re-sintering #1 (6 h), (c)re-sintering #3 (18 h), and (d) re-sintering #4 (24 h). Variation in image appearance (loss in perceived depth-of-field) is due to loss of image quality when reproducing from the original report
Close modal

Figure 15 depicts ceramographic images of etched sintered pellets. Figure 15(a) shows an image of the prior to resintering pellet with Figs. 15(b)15(d) showing images of pellets resintered at different sintering times. A well-developed grain-like microstructure can be observed in all images. Table 3 shows the average pellet density and grain size measurements, for the different resintering tests. As seen in Table 3, as resintering time is increased, there is a slight increase in the pellet density, increasing from 9.67 g/cm3 (prior to resintering) to 9.83 g/cm3 (after 24 h). There are some apparent inconsistencies in the trend of the grain size with resintering, where there is a gradual decrease in the grain size from 6 h (42 μm) to 18 h (27 μm), but then the grain size increases up to 49 μm after 24 h. It is noted that the statistical uncertainty in the average grain size is relatively large, ranging from ±23 μm (at 6 h) to ±16 μm (at 24 h). Thus, further measurements to establish the average grain size and to reduce the relative statistical uncertainty (to less than ±10%) may be necessary. It is recognized that the average grain size will be important with respect to fuel performance behavior, since a larger initial grain size will impact the fission gas release under irradiation conditions. It is also noted that the degree of heterogeneity in the sintered (Th,233U)O2 fuel pellet is not completely represented by the metrics shown in Table 3.

Fig. 15
Microstructure of etched pellets: (a) prior to re-sintering, (b) re-sintering #1 (6 h), (c) re-sintering #3 (18 h), and (d) re-sintering #4 (24 h). Note that image (a) has 5X Higher magnification compared to (b)–(d).
Fig. 15
Microstructure of etched pellets: (a) prior to re-sintering, (b) re-sintering #1 (6 h), (c) re-sintering #3 (18 h), and (d) re-sintering #4 (24 h). Note that image (a) has 5X Higher magnification compared to (b)–(d).
Close modal
Table 3

Average pellet density and grain size measurements for (Th,233U)O2 material

Density (g/cm3)Theoretical densitya (%)Grain size (μm)
AverageStd devAverageStd devAverageStd dev
Prior to re-sintering9.670.0496.50.3731
Re-sintering #1 (6-hours)9.800.0497.80.434223
Re-sintering #2 (12-hours)9.810.0197.90.143317
Re-sintering #3 (18-hours)9.830.0298.10.202715
Re-sintering #4 (24-hours)9.830.0198.10.134916
Density (g/cm3)Theoretical densitya (%)Grain size (μm)
AverageStd devAverageStd devAverageStd dev
Prior to re-sintering9.670.0496.50.3731
Re-sintering #1 (6-hours)9.800.0497.80.434223
Re-sintering #2 (12-hours)9.810.0197.90.143317
Re-sintering #3 (18-hours)9.830.0298.10.202715
Re-sintering #4 (24-hours)9.830.0198.10.134916
a

Estimated theoretical density of (Th,233U)O2 (1.4 wt. % 233U/(U + Th)) is 10.02  g/cm3. Theoretical density of ThO2 is 10.01 g/cm3 [36], theoretical density of UO2 is 10.97 g/cm3 [52].

Table 4 shows pore size distribution, in terms of overall, intergranular (existing or occurring between the grains or granules) and intragranular (existing within a grain or granule) porosity, which were determined from conducting the linear intercept method on micrographic images.

Table 4

Pore size measurements on (Th,233U)O2 pellets

Overall pore size (μm)Intergranular pore size (μm)Intragranular pore size (μm)
AverageStd devAverageStd devAverageStd dev
Prior to re-sintering63
Re-sintering #1 (6-hours)125134104
Re-sintering #2 (12-hours)158179124
Re-sintering #3 (18-hours)148158114
Re-sintering #4 (24-hours)18102310156
Overall pore size (μm)Intergranular pore size (μm)Intragranular pore size (μm)
AverageStd devAverageStd devAverageStd dev
Prior to re-sintering63
Re-sintering #1 (6-hours)125134104
Re-sintering #2 (12-hours)158179124
Re-sintering #3 (18-hours)148158114
Re-sintering #4 (24-hours)18102310156

As expected, the densification results showed that only a small increase in pellet density was achieved during the resintering tests as the prior to resintering pellets were already of relatively high density (see Fig. 13). After the first 6 h of resintering, pellet density attained a plateau regardless of the resintering time.

Since the sintering process was virtually complete in the prior to resintering pellets and the starting grain size was very small, the grain growth processes dominated over pellet densification during resintering tests. During the grain growth process, small grains are consumed by large grains and pores are swept by expanding grain boundaries and coalesce, growing in size until they pin the grain boundaries (at which point grain growth ceases).

For example, during resintering #1 (first 6 h), the average grain size of the pellet increased significantly. It has been suggested that at the final stage of green pellet sintering, pores are present mostly at grain boundaries [53]. The rapid shrinkage of the fraction of fine pores, controls the densification rate and grain growth while large pores remain unchanged or eventually increase their size at triple-point grain junctions due to the coalescence of fine pores [54].

As densification proceeds in resintering #2, 3 and 4, a very small increase on the pellet density is achieved (Fig. 13) while a decrease in the standard deviation of the grain size distribution was observed (Table 3). The decrease in the standard deviation of the grain size distribution suggests that a more homogenous grain size distribution is obtained after resintering #2. Table 4 shows that pores at triple-point grain junctions (intergranular porosity) increase their size, as the resintering process continues. This is mainly due to the coalescence of the remaining small pores. Simultaneously, pores trapped within grains cannot be further eliminated by sintering, remaining as intragranular porosity (Table 4) and inhibiting further pellet densification.

4.3 Thermal Diffusivity, Conductivity and Oxidation Behavior of (Th,U)O2.

In the late 2010s, CNL prepared a series of thorium-uranium oxide pellets with the goal of conducting thermal conductivity measurements on homogeneous and heterogeneous ThO2-UO2 fuels with different UO2 concentrations from room temperature to ∼1400 °C (1,673 K) [55], as well examining the oxidation behavior and resistance of thoria-urania fuel under off-normal reactor conditions. The focus on oxidation behavior was pursued to improve upon the understanding of postdefect (Th,U)O2 fuel behavior, with attention to fission gas release, the diffusivity of fission products, grain growth, and thermal conductivity. Table 5 summarizes the thorium-uranium compositions prepared for these studies, where the number in the sample ID correlates to the weight percentage of UO2 in ThO2 (ex. U1.5 represents 1.5 wt. % of UO2 in ThO2).

Table 5

Nominal composition and densities of the samples (Adapted from Saoudi et al. [55])

Sample IDSample compositionDensity (g/cm3)TD (%)aPreparation location and technique
ThO20 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.8498.4CNL: Conventional fabrication technique
U1.51.5 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.9899.6
U33 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.8898.5
U88 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.7596.7
U1313 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.9297.9
U3030 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.8495.6
U6060 wt. % UO2 in ThO210.2696.9
U7979 wt. % UO2 in ThO210.3596.2JRC-Karlsruhe: SPS technique
U9393 wt. % UO2 in ThO210.3194.5
UO2100 wt. % UO210.5496.2CNL: Conventional fabrication technique
Sample IDSample compositionDensity (g/cm3)TD (%)aPreparation location and technique
ThO20 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.8498.4CNL: Conventional fabrication technique
U1.51.5 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.9899.6
U33 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.8898.5
U88 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.7596.7
U1313 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.9297.9
U3030 wt. % UO2 in ThO29.8495.6
U6060 wt. % UO2 in ThO210.2696.9
U7979 wt. % UO2 in ThO210.3596.2JRC-Karlsruhe: SPS technique
U9393 wt. % UO2 in ThO210.3194.5
UO2100 wt. % UO210.5496.2CNL: Conventional fabrication technique
a

Note: “TD” is percentage of maximum theoretical mass density of mixture.

The Invincia vibratory mill, with zirconia cylinders as milling media, was used to simultaneously mix and mill the thorium-uranium powders (U1.5-U60) for a total of 3 h with any adhered powder being removed from the walls after every hour. Fifteen minute and 1-hour mixing intervals were also investigated for 1.5 wt. % of UO2 in ThO2, but as these mixing times were not further pursued for the rest of the (Th,U)O2 compositions, they will not be discussed further within this paper.

Green pellets were pressed to a green density of 60–70% TD with pressing pressures of 3000 psia (∼20.4 MPa) using a die with a diameter of 13.19 mm. No prepressing was required. Sintering took place at 1750 °C in a reducing atmosphere of pure hydrogen for 6 h before being cooled. Resulting densities are presented in Table 5. Heterogeneous thorium-uranium samples U79 and U93 (79 and 93 wt. % UO2 in ThO2, respectively) were prepared at JRC-Karlsruhe using Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS). SPS uses the simultaneous application of pressure and temperature to rapidly sinter powder materials into fully dense solids for a range of materials, including UO2 and ThO2 [5663]. Using a 6-mm diameter graphite die, 300 mg of the two UO2 and ThO2 compositions were sintered at a maximum temperature of 1,300 °C (1,573 K) for 5 min with a pressure of 35 MPa. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) using a Cu Kα radiation with a Bragg Brentano geometry revealed that the lattice parameter varied linearly with the concentration for 0, 3, 8, 30, 60 and 100 wt. % UO2 in ThO2 (see Fig. 16) with the XRD results for the SPS prepared pellets indicating that both samples prepared at JRC-Karlsruhe were biphasic. If the samples were not bi-phasic, then there would have been a nonlinear variation of the lattice parameter with UO2 content. For example, at 0% UO2, the lattice parameter is ∼5.6 Å, while at 100 wt. % UO2, the lattice parameter is ∼5.47 Å. Using these two bounding values and assuming biphasic material, then a simple linear interpolation for 30 wt. % UO2 gives ∼0.70 × 5.6 + 0.3 × 5.47 = 5.56 Å, which corresponds directly with the lattice parameter (∼ 5.56 Å) shown in Fig. 16 at 30 wt. % UO2.

Fig. 16
Variation of the lattice parameter with composition for the ThO2-UO2 solid solutions. The solid line indicates the calculated cell parameters using Vegard's Law (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [55])
Fig. 16
Variation of the lattice parameter with composition for the ThO2-UO2 solid solutions. The solid line indicates the calculated cell parameters using Vegard's Law (from original CNL internal reports, and similar to that reported in Ref. [55])
Close modal

Overall, the thermal diffusivity measurements collected at CNL (LFA) and JRC-Karlsruhe (formerly ITU) (LAF-1) were within the uncertainty of the flash method (5%) with the exception of the lower temperatures for the semitransparent samples (Fig. 17(a)); ThO2 and (Th,U)O2 with 1.5, 3, 8 and 13 wt. % UO2 were found to be semitransparent to the infrared wavelength of the laser and were subsequently coated with graphite for the thermal diffusivity measurements. The thermal diffusivity decreased rapidly with increasing uranium content from U1.5 up to U60, with sample U60, U79, and U93 being close to that of UO2 (Fig. 17(b)). Similar to the thermal diffusivity, for all temperatures, the thermal conductivity of (Th1 − x,Ux)O2 decreases with increasing UO2, as shown in Fig. 18 for CNL measurements. It is noted that for Industrial Standard Toolset (IST) computer codes that are used in the Canadian nuclear industry for the computational modeling and simulation of nuclear fuel, and associated performance and safety analyses [64], the thermal conductivity data is more useful and relevant.

Fig. 17
(a) Thermal diffusivity of ThO2 and UO2 measured with the laser flash apparatus at CNL (LFA) and with the shielded laser flash (LAF-1) Device at JRC-Karlsruhe (formerly ITU) and (b) thermal diffusivity of thorium-uranium mixed oxides for 0, 1.5, 3, 8, 13, 30, 60, 79, 93, and 100 wt. % UO2. Note: in the above plots, it is seen that the CNL measurement for thermal diffusivity of ThO2 at 1200 K is ∼1.5 mm2/s, which is slightly less than that measured for ThO2 by JRC-Karlsruhe (∼1.55 mm2/s)
Fig. 17
(a) Thermal diffusivity of ThO2 and UO2 measured with the laser flash apparatus at CNL (LFA) and with the shielded laser flash (LAF-1) Device at JRC-Karlsruhe (formerly ITU) and (b) thermal diffusivity of thorium-uranium mixed oxides for 0, 1.5, 3, 8, 13, 30, 60, 79, 93, and 100 wt. % UO2. Note: in the above plots, it is seen that the CNL measurement for thermal diffusivity of ThO2 at 1200 K is ∼1.5 mm2/s, which is slightly less than that measured for ThO2 by JRC-Karlsruhe (∼1.55 mm2/s)
Close modal
Fig. 18
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories measurements of thermal conductivity of the thorium-uranium mixed oxide samples for 95% of the theoretical density
Fig. 18
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories measurements of thermal conductivity of the thorium-uranium mixed oxide samples for 95% of the theoretical density
Close modal

A subset of the samples used for thermal diffusivity and conductivity trails were examined for oxidation behavior, which are presented in Table 6 [65]. Oxidation conditions were intended to simulate defective fuel behavior under normal operating conditions.

Table 6

Description of the “as-fabricated” fuel samples (adapted from Saoudi [65])

Sample IDSample compositionTh1 − xUxO2Density (g/cm3)Relative to maximum theoretical density (%)a
ThO2ThO2ThO29.8498.40
U88 wt. % UO2 in ThO2Th0.92U0.08O29.7596.70
U3030 wt. % UO2 in ThO2Th0.7U0.3O29.8495.63
U6060 wt. % UO2 in ThO2Th0.4U0.6O210.2696.90
UO2UO2UO210.5496.20
Sample IDSample compositionTh1 − xUxO2Density (g/cm3)Relative to maximum theoretical density (%)a
ThO2ThO2ThO29.8498.40
U88 wt. % UO2 in ThO2Th0.92U0.08O29.7596.70
U3030 wt. % UO2 in ThO2Th0.7U0.3O29.8495.63
U6060 wt. % UO2 in ThO2Th0.4U0.6O210.2696.90
UO2UO2UO210.5496.20
a

Note: Maximum theoretical density of pure ThO2 is 10.01 g/cm3, and for pure UO2 is 10.97 g/cm3 at 20 °C (293 K).

To probe the various depths of the oxidized (Th,U)O2 samples, different techniques were used: Neutron Powder Diffraction Analysis (NDA), X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS), and X-ray Photo-electron Spectroscopy (XPS). XRD and NDA revealed that the as-fabricated UO2, ThO2, and (Th,U)O2 samples were comprised of a single cubic phase with a fluorite structure. Examination of the local structure around the uranium atoms using XAS indicated that the Th and U are randomly distributed in the solid solutions, confirming the XRD and NDA findings. Oxidized MOX samples showed a higher degree of oxidation on the surface (as determined with XPS) compared to the subsurface of the samples (probed by XAS). The bulk of the samples, which were inter-rogated through the NDA technique, showed that with high UO2 content, two cubic structures co-exist (UO2.06 and (Th,U)O2) with the weight fraction of the UO2.06 decreasing with decreasing UO2 content [65].

4.4 Recent (Th,Pu)O2 Fuel Fabrication Trials at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories.

Pellet fabrication of ThO2 and (Th,Pu)O2 were pursued at CNL's Recycle Fuel Fabrication Laboratories (RFFL) with the aim to improve upon the homogeneity of mixed oxide fuels, thereby improving fuel performance, particularly at high burnups [66]. In particular, developing a fabrication methodology that would eliminate residual granules, as well as produce pellets with grain sizes >5 μm, for a range of Pu concentrations, was desired.

To determine the impact of various blending methods, first vibratory milling (or comilling as it was referred to in Sec. 3.2.3 (Powder Co-Milling) of ThO2 and PuO2 powders was conducted to reduce and homogenize the particle size of the PuO2 in the ThO2 matrix. The second blending method used a two stage method to produce higher PuO2 concentration mixtures where first ∼30 wt. % PuO2 was vibratory milled with a subtotal of the necessary ThO2, which was subsequently followed with low intensity blending of additional ThO2 powder to achieve the desired Pu concentration. This two stage blending method produced “islands” of homogenous PuO2-ThO2 within a ThO2 matrix (identified as Master Mix, as discussed in Sec. 3.2.2 (High Intensity Blending with a Master Mix) [66]. The experimental matrix, which includes blend number, Pu concentration, blending method, sintering parameters, and immersion density results, are presented in Table 7. Precompaction, granulation, lubrication and final compaction were completed before sintering in a 10% hydrogen and 90% nitrogen environment. It is recognized that the range of sintering temperatures shown in Table 7 is rather large, with the low range between 1600 °C and 1800 °C, and the high range between 1800 °C and 2000 °C, as bounding values. In actuality, the specific sintering temperatures used in the sintering furnace were exact values and were controlled relatively well. Specific values for sintering temperatures are not shown due to proprietary and intellectual property issues.

Table 7

Blending method, pre-pressing, final pressing, and sintering parameters (adapted from Leeder et al. [66])

Blend numberwt. % (Pu + Am) contentPowder blending methodSintering temperature (°C)aSintering time (hours)Immersion density (g/cm3)
#13Co-MillingLow (1600–1800)39.57–9.64
#23High (1800–2000)49.63–9.73
#33High (1800–2000)69.69–9.79
#43High (1800–2000)89.74–9.79
#53High (1800–2000)109.76–9.80
#68Master mixLow (1600–1800)49.63–9.67
#78High (1800–2000)49.59–9.62
#83High (1800–2000)129.75–9.79
#93High (1800–2000)169.78–9.79
#103High (1800–2000)249.69–9.71
Blend numberwt. % (Pu + Am) contentPowder blending methodSintering temperature (°C)aSintering time (hours)Immersion density (g/cm3)
#13Co-MillingLow (1600–1800)39.57–9.64
#23High (1800–2000)49.63–9.73
#33High (1800–2000)69.69–9.79
#43High (1800–2000)89.74–9.79
#53High (1800–2000)109.76–9.80
#68Master mixLow (1600–1800)49.63–9.67
#78High (1800–2000)49.59–9.62
#83High (1800–2000)129.75–9.79
#93High (1800–2000)169.78–9.79
#103High (1800–2000)249.69–9.71
a

Note: bounding values (lower/upper) are given for the sintering temperatures. Exact values are not shown due to proprietary and intellectual property issues.

A key finding of the study conducted by Leeder et al. [66] was that (Th,Pu)O2 sintered for 8-10 h at high temperature produced fuel higher densities and larger grain sizes. Pellets produced using the Master Mix method (Sintering “Islands”) required longer sintering times than compared to those produced using comilling (Homogeneous Blending). Importantly, (Th,Pu)O2 fuel microstructure was found to be dependent on both blending method and sintering time. For example, pellets manufactured by comilling, a sintering time greater than 8 h, and a high sintering temperature, showed a homogeneous microstructure with an average grain size of ∼9 μm and an average sintered density of 9.76 g/cm3. MOX fuel with these specifications are expected to have improved irradiation performance, especially at burnups greater than 40 MWd/KgHE. In contrast, pellets manufactured using the Master Mix method, a sintering time of 16 h, and a high sintering temperature, resulted in fuel with an overall average grain size of 4 μm (∼8 μm in areas containing Pu) and an average sintered density of 9.78 g/cm3. Blending using the Master Mix method also produced a slightly granular microstructure with areas of both large and small grains, suggestive of a bi-modal grain size distribution. The higher Pu concentration within the thoria matrix causes increased grain growth during sintering, and while it is expected to have improved fuel performance, the bi-modal grain size distribution may result in slightly higher fission gas release than (Th,Pu)O2 fuel with a homogeneous Pu and grain size distribution [66].

5 Summary and Conclusions

Thorium-based fuels are potentially attractive for advanced fuels and fuel cycles in ARs and various SMR technologies to help conserve uranium resources, to help reduce long-term radioactive waste liabilities, and to ensure long-term nuclear energy sustainability and security.

CNL has invested significant effort over the past 50 years in ThO2, (Th,U)O2, and (Th,Pu)O2 fuel development resulting in valuable data and experience. Most ThO2 pellet fabrication processes include a step to add a fissile component (U or Pu), as thorium lacks a fissile isotope. Typical fissile components are enriched uranium dioxide (UO2), plutonium dioxide (PuO2), as well as 233U in the form of 233UO2. This review paper has focused on the effects of the different ThO2/fissile-component mixing methods used at CNL on the sintered pellet density, microstructure and fissile component distribution and homogeneity, as well as thermal diffusivity and oxidation behavior. ThO2/fissile-component mixing methods were classified as solution blending and mechanical mixing. Solution blending methods included Sol-Gel, Co-Precipitation and Solution Impregnation processes. If the fissile component is added during the ThO2 powder production stage, solution blending methods have typically produced a uniform distribution of the fissile component within the ThO2 matrix.

Some general observations regarding ThO2-based fuel pellet fabrication are:

  • Selection of the powder mixing method. Special attention should be taken during the selection and operation of the ThO2-fissile component mixing method to avoid granular-like microstructures in the sintered pellets.

  • Starting ThO2 powder. The sinterability and the properties of the powder, including particle morphology, size distribution and surface area, are among the most important characteristic of the starting ThO2 powder. These will strongly influence the final quality of the fuel in terms of density, microstructure (granular- or grain-like), grain size distribution and fissile component distribution and homogeneity.

  • Blending of PuO2 and ThO2 powders: blending methodology has an impact on final sintered density and grain size of (Th,Pu)O2 pellets. For the same sintering temperature and sintering time, co-milling was resulted in a higher sintered density than blending using the Master Mix method, which produced Pu “islands”. However, it is advised that blending, pressing, and sintering methods are selected in tandem as all process steps have a significant impact on final pellet characteristics. The use of co-milling helps reduce the grain size and ensure a more uniform distribution of fuel grains of different oxides within the pressed and sintered oxide fuel pellet.

  • ThO2 powder pressing. ThO2 is harder and more abrasive than UO2. Caution should be exercised during the selection of powder binders and lubricants during green pellet production. Green pellets tend to end cap (delamination of the ends of the pellet) as ThO2 powders are not as amenable to the cold pellet pressing process. Use of pre-pressing of powders and final pressing of pellets with pressures in the range 20 to 35 MPa helps to improve the homogenization and densification of the sintered pellets by breaking up larger granules and displacing interstitial voids.

  • Green pellet sintering. Since surface energy reduction is the driving force in sintering, high specific surface area fine powders are required. The sintering operating parameters must be selected in conjunction with the powder mixing method, as discussed above, as the properties of the powder strongly influence the final quality of the sintered pellet. Extended periods of sintering (24 hours or more) at 1,700 °C or higher allows a reduction in the number of small pores, as they are filled with diffusing fuel granules, while the gases initially trapped in the voids are able to escape from the fuel pellet.

  • In-reactor performance. Re-sintering trials on (Th,233U)O2 fuel pellets revealed that greater than 97% TD can be achieved, thereby verifying that there will not be excessive in-pile densification of (Th,233U)O2 fuel.

  • Characterization of fuel during fabrication. Characterization of fuel at different stages of the fabrication process must be thorough. Examination of sintered pellets must always include a microstructure analysis of cut and polished pellets to identify the type of microstructure produced (granular- or grain-like) and determine grain size distribution, fissile component distribution, and homogeneity.

  • Thermal conductivity of (Th,U)O2. Increasing UO2 content and temperature caused a decrease in thermal conductivity; UO2 contents of 60% and higher indicated that the thermal conductivity of the thorium-uranium oxide fuel was close to that of UO2. With higher UO2 content, the effective thermal conductivity can be improved with a biphasic microstructure.

Going forward into the future, with its experience and expertise, CNL is well positioned to support the next generation of ARs and SMRs using advanced fuels and fuel cycles, including the use of thorium-based fuels.

Acknowledgment

The authors recognize the help and assistance, guidance, and oversight provided by the following staff at CNL: Ali Siddiqui, Cathy Thiriet, Gordon Burton, Tina Wilson, Daniel Cluff, Mouna Saoudi, Lin Xiao, Lori St. Cyr, Jeffrey Baschuk, the scientific and operations staff of the Recycled Fuel Fabrication Laboratory (RFFL) at CNL and other CNL staff not named here.

Funding Data

  • Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL), under the auspices of the Federal Nuclear Science and Technology (FNST) Work Plan (Award No. FST-51120.0.A049; Funder ID: 10.13039/501100004953).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and supporting the findings of this article are obtainable from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Nomenclature

Greek Symbols
α =

alpha

γ =

gamma

Subscripts or Superscripts
233U =

uranium isotope 233

232Th =

thorium isotope 232

Acronyms and Abbreviations
AECL =

atomic energy of Canada limited

AR =

advanced reactor

CANDU =

Canada deuterium uranium

CLS =

Canadian light source

CNL =

Canadian nuclear laboratories

CRL =

chalk river laboratories

CT =

coulometric titration

Cu =

copper

DLS =

dynamic light scattering

FE-SEM =

field emission-scanning electron microscope

HEU =

high enriched uranium

ITU =

Institute for Transuranium Elements

JRC =

joint research center

K =

Kelvin

LFA =

laser flash analysis

MOX =

mixed oxide

NDA =

neutron powder diffraction analysis

NRU =

national research universal

O/M =

oxygen to metal ratio

ORNL =

oak ridge national laboratory

PSA =

particle size analysis

PT-HWR =

pressure tube heavy water reactor

PuO2 =

plutonium dioxide

RFFL =

recycle fuel fabrication laboratories

SIMFUEL =

simulated high-burnup nuclear fuel

SEM =

scanning electron microscopy

SMR =

small modular reactor

Sol-Gel =

solution-gelation

SPS =

spark plasma sintering

S&T =

science and technology

TD =

theoretical density

ThO2 =

thorium dioxide

UO2 =

uranium dioxide

WL =

Whiteshell laboratories

XAS =

X-ray absorption spectroscopy

XRD =

X-ray diffraction

XPS =

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

ZrO2 =

zirconium dioxide

References

1.
Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA),
2023
, “
Uranium 2022: Resources, Production and Demand
,”
NEA, Paris, France
, NEA Report No. 7634.
2.
Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA),
2016
, “
Uranium 2016: Resources, Production and Demand
,” NEA Report No. 7301, NEA, Paris, France
3.
Floyd
,
M. R.
,
Beier
,
R.
,
Bell
,
J. S.
,
Bergeron
,
A.
,
Bulemela
,
E.
,
Cota-Sanchez
,
G.
,
Dickson
,
R. S.
,
Leeder
,
K.
,
Livingstone
,
S. J.
, et al.,
2016
, “
Progress in the Development of Thoria Fuel Science and Technology
,”
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on CANDU Fuel
, Kingston, ON, Canada, Aug. 15–18, pp.
1
12
.
4.
Sickafus
,
K. E.
,
Minervini
,
L.
,
Grimes
,
R. W.
,
Valdez
,
J. A.
,
Ishimaru
,
M.
,
Li
,
F.
,
McClellan
,
K. J.
, and
Hartmann
,
T.
,
2000
, “
Radiation Tolerance of Complex Oxides
,”
Science
,
289
(
5480
), pp.
748
751
.10.1126/science.289.5480.748
5.
Bergeron
,
A.
,
Manara
,
D.
,
Benes
,
O.
,
Eloirdi
,
R.
,
Piro
,
M. H. A.
, and
Corcoran
,
E. C.
,
2018
, “
Thermodynamic Modelling of Thoria-Urania and Thoria-Plutonia Fuels: Description of the Th-U-Pu-O Quaternary System
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
,
512
, pp.
324
348
.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.09.013
6.
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2016
, “
Heterogeneous Seed-Blanket Cores in Pressure-Tube Heavy Water Reactors for Extracting Energy Potential From Plutonium/Thorium Fuels
,”
CNL Nucl. Rev.
,
6
(
1
), pp.
1
12
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305695533_HETEROGENEOUS_SEED-BLANKET_CORES_IN_PRESSURE-TUBE_HEAVY_WATER_REACTORS_FOR_EXTRACTING_THE_ENERGY_POTENTIAL_FROM_PLUTONIUMTHORIUM_FUELS
7.
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2016
, “
Multi-Region Annular Heterogeneous Core Concepts for Plutonium-Thorium Fuels in Pressure-Tube Heavy Water Reactors
,”
Nucl. Technol. J.
,
194
(
2
), pp.
192
203
.10.13182/NT14-101
8.
Dimayuga
,
F. C.
,
Floyd
,
M. R.
,
Schankula
,
M. H.
, and
Sullivan
,
J. D.
,
1996
, “
Technical Overview – CANDU MOX Fuel Dual Irradiation Experiment – Parallex Project
,” Revision 0, Chalk River, ON, Canada, AECL Report No.
100-37000-TD-001
.https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc676057/m2/1/high_res_d/467094.pdf
9.
Floyd
,
M.
,
Bromley
,
B. P.
, and
Pencer
,
J.
,
2016
, “
A Canadian Perspective on Progress in Thoria Fuel Science and Technology
,”
CNL Nucl. Rev.
,
6
(
1
), pp.
1
17
.10.12943/CNR.2016.00016
10.
Bromley
,
B. P.
, and
Colton
,
A. V.
,
2021
, “
Assessment of Feasibility of Using Advanced, Non-Conventional Fuels in a Pressure-Tube Heavy Water Reactor to Destroy Americium and Curium
,”
ANS Nucl. Technol. J.
,
207
(
8
), pp.
1193
1215
.10.1080/00295450.2020.1853466
11.
Mendoza
,
A. D.
, and
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2019
, “
A Canadian Perspective of the Economic Issues Associated With the Deployment of Thorium-Based Fuels From 1942 to 1995
,”
CNL Nucl. Rev.
,
8
(
2
), pp.
1
22
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330612132_A_CANADIAN_PERSPECTIVE_OF_THE_ECONOMIC_ISSUES_ASSOCIATED_WITH_DEPLOYING_THORIUM-BASED_FUEL_CYCLES_AND_BREEDING_IN_HEAVY-WATER_REACTORS
12.
Yan
,
H. V.
,
Dugal
,
C.
,
Colton
,
A. V.
,
Bromley
,
B. P.
, and
Golesorkhi
,
S.
,
2018
, “
Comparisons Between RFSP and MCNP for Modeling Pressure Tube Heavy Water Reactor Cores With Thorium-Based Fuels
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
120
, pp.
642
655
.10.1016/j.anucene.2018.06.036
13.
Colton
,
A. V.
, and
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2018
, “
Simulations of Pressure-Tube–Heavy-Water Reactor Cores Fueled With Thorium-Based Mixed-Oxide Fuels
,”
Nucl. Technol.
,
203
(
2
), pp.
146
172
.10.1080/00295450.2018.1444898
14.
Colton
,
A. V.
, and
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2018
, “
Lattice Physics Evaluation of 35-Element Mixed Oxide Thorium-Based Fuels for Use in Pressure Tube Heavy Water Reactors
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
117
, pp.
259
276
.10.1016/j.anucene.2018.03.010
15.
Mendoza
,
A. D.
,
Wojtaszek
,
D. T.
,
Colton
,
A. V.
, and
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2018
, “
Resource Demand and Economic Impact of Various Thorium-Based Fuels for Potential Near-Term Use in a Pressure-Tube Heavy Water Reactor
,”
Nucl. Technol.
,
203
(
3
), pp.
232
243
.10.1080/00295450.2018.1447209
16.
Mendoza
,
A. D.
,
Moore
,
M.
,
Colton
,
A. V.
, and
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2018
, “
A Preliminary Economic Assessment of Thorium-Based Fuels in a Pressure Tube Heavy Water Reactor
,”
Nucl. Technol.
,
202
(
1
), pp.
39
52
.10.1080/00295450.2018.1424431
17.
Colton
,
A. V.
,
Bromley
,
B. P.
, and
Golesorkhi
,
S.
,
2017
, “
Assessment of Near-Breeding Heterogeneous Seed/Blanket Cores in Pressure-Tube Heavy Water Reactors With Thorium-Based Fuels
,”
Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc.
, 116(1), pp.
97
102
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328695986_Assessment_of_Near-Breeding_Heterogeneous_SeedBlanket_Cores_in_Pressure-Tube_Heavy_Water_Reactors_with_Thorium-Based_Fuels
18.
Colton
,
A. V.
,
Dugal
,
C.
,
Bromley
,
B. P.
, and
Yan
,
H. V.
,
2017
, “
Code-to-Code Comparisons of Lattice Physics Calculations for Thorium-Augmented and Thorium-Based Fuels in Pressure Tube Heavy Water Reactors
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
103
, pp.
194
203
.10.1016/j.anucene.2017.01.023
19.
Golesorkhi
,
S.
,
Bromley
,
B. P.
, and
Kaye
,
M. H.
,
2016
, “
Simulations of a Pressure-Tube Heavy Water Reactor Operating on Near-Breeding Thorium Cycles
,”
ANS Nucl. Technol. J.
,
194
(
2
), pp.
178
191
.10.13182/NT15-30
20.
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2014
, “
High Utilization Lattices for Thorium-Based Fuel Cycles in Heavy Water Reactors”, ANS
,”
Nucl. Technol. J.
,
186
(
1
), pp.
17
32
.10.13182/NT13-86
21.
Bromley
,
B. P.
, and
Alexander
,
J.
,
2018
, “
Assessment of Fast-Spectrum Blanket Lattices for Breeding Fissile Fuel From Thorium and Depleted Uranium in an Externally-Driven Sub-Critical Gas-Cooled Pressure Tube Reactor
,”
CNL Nucl. Rev.
,
7
(
2
), pp.
201
220
.10.12943/CNR.2018.00010
22.
Wojtaszek
,
D. T.
, and
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2023
, “
Reactor Physics Assessment of Annular Plutonium-Thorium Fuels for Use in Prismatic Fuel Blocks in a HTGR-SMR With a Hydrogen-Based Moderator (7LiH)
,”
Proceedings of M&C 2023 Conference
, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, Aug. 13–17, pp.
1
9
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373257928_DRAFT_MC2023_Conference_Proceedings_Reactor_Physics_Assessment_of_Annular_Plutonium-Thorium_Fuels_for_Use_in_Prismatic_Fuel_Blocks_in_a_HTGR-SMR_with_a_Hydrogen-Based_Moderator_7LiH
23.
Yan
,
H. V.
, and
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2024
, “
Assessment of Reactor Physics Characteristics of Prismatic Fuel Concepts With a Hydrogen-Based Moderator for Use in a Fluoride Salt-Cooled Small Modular Reactor
,”
ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci.
,
10
(
2
), p.
021502
.10.1115/1.4063388
24.
Wojtaszek
,
D. T.
, and
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2023
, “
Physics Evaluation of Alternative Uranium-Based Oxy-Carbide Annular Fuel Concepts for Potential Use in Compact High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors
,”
ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci.
,
9
(
1
), p.
011504
.10.1115/1.4055009
25.
Nguyen
,
T. S.
,
Wang
,
X.
, and
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2022
, “
Review of Methods and Results for Reactor Physics Analysis of Thorium-Based Fuels From Irradiation Experiments Conducted in NRU
,”
ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci.
,
8
(
3
), p.
031502
.10.1115/1.4053691
26.
Barry
,
A.
,
2021
, “
Experimental Measurements to Evaluate the Effects of Fuel Microstructure on Fission Gas Release In Thoria
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
151
, p.
107933
.10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107933
27.
Haas
,
P. A.
,
1972
, “
Process Requirements for Preparing ThO2 Spheres by the ORNL Sol-Gel Process
,”
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report (ORNL)
,
Oak Ridge, TN
, Report No. ORNL-TM03978.
28.
Matthews
,
R. B.
,
1978
, “
Thoria Sol-Gel Processes
,”
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL), Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment (WNRE)
,
Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada
, Report No. AECL-6303.
29.
Turner
,
C. W.
,
1991
, “
Sol-Gel Process—Principles and Applications
,”
Ceram. Bull.
,
70
(
9
), pp.
1487
1490
.
30.
Onofrei
,
M.
,
1986
, “
Sol-Gel Extrusion Process for Fabrication of (U,Th)O2, Recycle Fuel
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
,
137
(
3
), pp.
207
211
.10.1016/0022-3115(86)90221-7
31.
Tewari
,
P. H.
, and
Campbell
,
A. B.
,
1980
, “
The Role of Uranium(VI) in the ThO2-UO3 Sol-Gel Process
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
,
78
(
1
), pp.
155
162
.10.1016/0021-9797(80)90503-2
32.
Matthews
,
R. B.
, and
Swanson
,
M. L.
,
1979
, “
Fabrication of Large (U,Th)O2 Microspheres
,”
Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull.
,
58
(
2
), pp.
223
227
.
33.
Hastings
,
I. J.
,
Celli
,
A.
,
Onofrei
,
M.
, and
Swanson
,
M. L.
,
1982
, “
Irradiation Performance of (U,Th)O2 Fuel Designed for Advanced Cycle Applications
,”
3rd Annual Conference of the Canadian Nuclear Society
, Toronto, ON, Canada, Report No. AECL-7697.
34.
Turner
,
C. W.
,
Clatworthy
,
B. C.
, and
Celli
,
A.
,
1986
, “
A Sol-Gel Process for the Production of Ceramic Microspheres of Thorium Dioxide From Low Viscosity Sols
,” Proceedings of the International Conference on CANDU Fuel, Chalk River, ON, Canada, Report No.
AECL-9512
.https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/22/069/22069630.pdf?r=1
35.
Hamilton
,
H.
,
Livingstone
,
S.
, and
Popov
,
B.
,
2007
, “
Thorium Fuel Fabrication and Testing at AECL
,”
International Workshop Thorium Utilization for Sustainable Development of Nuclear Energy, TU2007
, Beijing, China, Dec. 4–6, pp.
1
12
.
36.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
,
2005
, “
Thorium Fuel Cycle—Potential Benefits and Challenges
,” IAEA, Vienna, Austria, Report No. IAEA-TECDOC-1450.
37.
Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA-OECD)
,
2015
, “
Introduction of Thorium in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
,” NEA, Paris, France, NEA No. 7224.
38.
Boczar
,
P. G.
,
Chan
,
P. S. W.
,
Dyck
,
G. R.
,
Ellis
,
R. J.
,
Jones
,
R. T.
,
Sullivan
,
J. D.
, and
Taylor
,
P.
,
2002
, “
Thorium Fuel-Cycle Studies for CANDU Reactors
,”
Thorium Fuel Utilization: Options and Trends, Proceedings of 1997, 1998 and 1999 IAEA Meetings
,
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
,
Vienna, Austria
, Paper No. IAEA-TECDOC-1319.https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/33/068/33068562.pdf?r=1
39.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),
2012
, “
Role of Thorium to Supplement Fuel Cycles of Future Nuclear Energy Systems
,” IAEA, Vienna, Austria, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NF-T-2.4, Canada, pp. 9–14, accessed June 1, 2024, https://www.iaea.org/publications/8703/role-of-thorium-to-supplement-fuel-cycles-of-future-nuclear-energy-systems
40.
Feraday
,
M. A.
,
Cotnam
,
K. D.
, and
Preto
,
F.
,
1979
, “
Alternative Method of Making Recycle Fuel: Impregnation of Low Density Pellets
,”
Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull.
,
58
(
12
), pp.
1189
1192
.
41.
Matzke
,
H.
,
1976
, “
Diffusion of Th and U in Thorium Dioxide
,”
J. de Phys. Colloques
,
37
(
C7
), pp. C7-452–C7-457.10.1051/jphyscol:19767101
42.
Matzke
,
H.
,
1966
, “
Diffusion Processes in Nuclear Fuels
,”
J. Less Common Met.
,
21
, pp.
537
564
.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:18027149
43.
Dimayuga
,
F. C.
,
1995
, “
AECL's Experience in MOX Fuel Fabrication and Irradiation in Recycling of Plutonium and Uranium in Water Reactor Fuel
,” Proceedings for IAEA Technical Committee Meeting,
Newby Bridge
,
Windermere, UK
, Paper No.
IAEA-TECDOC-941
, pp.
373
385
.https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/28/047/28047133.pdf?r=1
44.
Dimayuga
,
F. C.
,
Floyd
,
M. R.
, and
Cox
,
S.
,
1999
, “
Fabrication and Performance Testing of CANDU Mixed-Oxide Fuel
,” IAEA International Symposium on MOX Fuel Cycle Technologies for Medium and Long Term Deployment,
IAEA
,
Vienna, Austria
, Paper No.
IAEA-CSP-3/P
, pp.
292
299
.https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/20122175
45.
Karam
,
M.
,
Dimayuga
,
F. C.
, and
Montin
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Post-Irradiation Examination Of CANDU Fuel Bundles Fuelled With (Th, Pu)O2
,”
11th International Conference on CANDU Fuel
, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, Oct. 17–20, pp.
1
15
.https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/49/101/49101473.pdf?r=1
46.
Rao
,
S. V. K.
,
1963
, “
Investigation of ThO2 – UO2 as a Nuclear Fuel
,” Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL), Chalk River Laboratories,
J. Nucl. Mater.
, 12(3), pp. 323–329.10.1016/0022-3115(64)90087-X
47.
Jeffs
,
A. T.
,
Boucher
,
R. R.
, and
Norlock
,
L. R.
,
1967
, “
Fabrication of UO2 - PuO2 and ThO2 - PuO2 Experimental Fuel
,”
IAEA Symposium on Plutonium as a Reactor Fuel
,
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
,
Vienna, Austria
, Mar. 13–17, pp.
179
187
.https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/44/073/44073734.pdf?r=1
48.
Corbett
,
S.
,
Floyd
,
M. R.
,
Hamilton
,
H.
,
Livingstone
,
S.
, and
Harrison
,
N. F.
,
2013
, “
DME-221 Thoria Fuel: Fabrication, Irradiation Testing, and Post-Irradiation Examination
,”
Proceedings of 12th International Conference on CANDU Fuel
, Kingston, ON, Canada, Sept. 15–18, pp.
1
15
.https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/49/101/49101476.pdf
49.
Saoudi
,
M.
,
Mouris
,
J.
,
Hayes
,
J. R.
,
Grosvenor
,
A. P.
, and
Do
,
T.
,
2016
, “
Investigation of the Oxidation Behavior of Thorium-Uranium Mixed Oxides Under Controlled Oxidation Experiments
,”
4th Nuclear Materials Conference-NuMat2016- Poster Session 1
, Le Corum, Montpellier, France, Nov. 7–10.
50.
Reed
,
S. J.
,
1988
,
Introduction to the Principles of Ceramic Processing
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
51.
Cho
,
G. C.
,
Dodds
,
J.
, and
Santamarina
,
J. C.
,
2006
, “
Particle Shape Effects on Packing Density, Stiffness, and Strength: Natural and Crushed Sands
,”
J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.
,
132
(
5
), pp.
591
602
.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:5(591)
52.
Popov
,
S. G.
,
Carbajo
,
J. J.
,
Lvanov
,
V. K.
, and
Yoder
,
G. L.
,
2000
, “
Thermophysical Properties of MOX and UO2 Fuels Including the Effects of Irradiation
,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge,
TN
, Report No.
ORNL/TM-2000/351
.https://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/Files/Pub57523.pdf
53.
Suk-Joong
,
L. K.
,
2005
,
Sintering: Densification, Grain Growth and Microstructure
,
Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann
,
Burlington, MA
.
54.
Assman
,
H.
, and
Stehle
,
H.
,
1978
, “
Thermal and In-Reactor Densification of UO2: Mechanisms and Experimental Results
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
48
(
1
), pp.
49
67
.10.1016/0029-5493(78)90208-X
55.
Saoudi
,
M.
,
Staicu
,
D.
,
Mouris
,
J.
,
Bergeron
,
A.
,
Hamilton
,
H.
,
Naji
,
M.
,
Freis
,
D.
, and
Cologna
,
M.
,
2018
, “
Thermal Diffusivity and Conductivity of Thorium-Uranium Mixed Oxides
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
,
500
, pp.
381
388
.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.01.014
56.
Malakkal
,
L.
,
Prasad
,
A.
,
Ranasinghe
,
J.
,
Jossou
,
E.
,
Oladimeji
,
D.
,
Szpunar
,
B.
,
Bichler
,
L.
, and
Szpunar
,
J.
,
2019
, “
The Effect of SPS Processing Parameters on the Microstructure and Thermal Conductivity of ThO2
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
,
527
, p.
151811
.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151811
57.
De Bona
,
E.
,
Balice
,
L.
,
Cognini
,
L.
,
Holzhäuser
,
M.
,
Popa
,
K.
,
Walter
,
O.
,
Cologna
,
M.
,
Prieur
,
D.
,
Wiss
,
T.
, et al.,
2021
, “
Single-Step, High Pressure, and Two-Step Spark Plasma Sintering of UO2 Nanopowders
,”
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
,
41
(
6
), pp.
3655
3663
.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.01.020
58.
Hungría
,
T.
,
Galy
,
J.
, and
Castro
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Spark Plasma Sintering as a Useful Technique to the Nanostructuration of Piezo-Ferroelectric Materials
,”
Adv. Eng. Mater.
,
11
(
8
), pp.
615
631
.10.1002/adem.200900052
59.
Tyrpekl
,
V.
,
Cologna
,
M.
,
Vigier
,
J.-F.
,
Cambriani
,
A.
,
De Weerd
,
W.
, and
Somers
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Preparation of Bulk-Nanostructured UO2 Pellets Using High-Pressure Spark Plasma Sintering for LWR Fuel Safety Assessment
,”
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
,
100
(
4
), pp.
1269
1274
.10.1111/jace.14647
60.
Tyrpekl
,
V.
,
Cologna
,
M.
,
Robba
,
D.
, and
Somers
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Sintering Behavior of Nanocrystalline ThO2 Powder Using Spark Plasma Sintering
,”
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
,
36
(
3
), pp.
767
772
.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.006
61.
Ameri
,
S.
,
Sadeghian
,
Z.
, and
Kazeminezhad
,
I.
,
2016
, “
Effect of CNT Addition Approach on the Microstructure and Properties of NiAl-CNT Nanocomposites Produced by Mechanical Alloying and Spark Plasma Sintering
,”
Intermetallics
,
76
, pp.
41
48
.10.1016/j.intermet.2016.06.010
62.
Nayan
,
N.
,
Shukla
,
A. K.
,
Chandran
,
P.
,
Bakshi
,
S. R.
,
Murty
,
S. V. S. N.
,
Pant
,
B.
, and
Venkitakrishnan
,
P. V.
,
2017
, “
Processing and Characterization of Spark Plasma Sintered Copper/Carbon Nanotube Composites
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng.: A
,
682
, pp.
229
237
.10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.114
63.
Wangle
,
T.
,
Tyrpekl
,
V.
,
Cologna
,
M.
, and
Somers
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Simulated UO2 Fuel Containing CSI by Spark Plasma Sintering
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
,
466
, pp.
150
153
.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.07.030
64.
Prudil
,
A.
,
Lewis
,
B. J.
,
Chan
,
P. K.
, and
Baschuk
,
J. J.
,
2015
, “
Development and Testing of the FAST Fuel Performance Code: Normal Operating Conditions (Part 1)
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
282
, pp.
158
168
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.09.036
65.
Saoudi
,
M.
,
Hayes
,
J. R.
,
Lang
,
J.
,
Grosvenor
,
A. P.
,
Do
,
T.
, and
Mouris
,
J.
,
2022
, “
Oxidation Behavior of Thorium-Uranium Mixed Oxides in Controlled Oxidation Experiments
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
,
572
, p.
154047
.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.154047
66.
Leeder
,
K.
,
Yatabe
,
S.
,
Floyd
,
M. R.
,
Cota-Sanchez
,
G.
,
Beier
,
R.
, and
Mayhew
,
C.
,
2018
, “
Fabrication and Characterization of (Th,Pu)O2 Fuel at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
,
508
, pp.
599
608
.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.06.027