Abstract

Small modular reactors (SMRs) have gained international attention due to their modular design, small footprint, and cost advantages compared to conventional reactors. Multiple types of SMRs are under development globally, and regulatory agencies are working toward a comprehensive and harmonized regulatory framework for ensuring safety and environmental protection. However, several aspects related to SMRs require further investigation, including the behavior of nuclear fuel under high pressures and temperatures (1000 °C), radiation exposure levels during normal and accident conditions, management of different types and volumes of nuclear waste, and their safe storage and disposal. Additionally, the modular design and compact size of SMRs make them suitable for deployment in remote locations, including the Arctic region. However, before introducing SMR technology, a thorough study of Arctic soil is necessary, particularly in the context of changing climate. Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) plays a vital role in evaluating the safety and reliability of nuclear power plants, specifically focusing on assessing cross-unit interactions in the case of multimodule SMRs. Furthermore, given the use of low-enriched uranium fuel and the potential for limited on-site personnel in remote locations, effective nuclear safeguards and material accountancy measures are crucial to prevent the diversion of nuclear materials. In this paper, an investigation is conducted to explore the advantages and challenges involved in the deployment of emerging SMR technologies for electricity generation and other applications.

References

1.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), 2021, “Small Modular Reactors: Challenges and Opportunities,” NEA No. 7560, OECD Publishing, Paris, accessed Dec. 15, 2022, https://www.oecd-nea.org/upload/docs/application/pdf/2021-03/7560_smr_report.pdf
2.
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
2022
, “
Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments: A Supplement to IAEA Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS)
,” accessed Dec. 15, 2022, https://aris.iaea.org/Publications/SMR_booklet_2022.pdf
3.
World Nuclear News
,
2021
, “
Demonstration HTR-PM Connected to Grid
,” accessed Jan. 15, 2023, https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Demonstration-HTR-PM-connected-to-grid
4.
Ingersoll
,
D. T.
,
2016
,
Small Modular Reactors: Nuclear Power Fad or Future
,
Woodland Publishing
, p.
184
.
5.
IAEA,
2022
, “
Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments. A Supplement to: IAEA Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS)
,”
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
Vienna, Austria
, accessed Dec. 6, 2022, https://aris.iaea.org/Publications/SMR_booklet_2022.pdf
6.
Carelli
,
M. D.
, and
Ingersoll
,
D. T.
, eds.,
2020
,
Handbook of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors
, 2nd ed.,
Woodhead Publishing
, p.
646
.
7.
Zohuri
,
B.
,
2020
,
Nuclear Micro Reactors
,
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
, Cham, Switzerland, p.
120
.
8.
Zohuri
,
B.
,
2019
,
Small Modular Reactors as Renewable Energy Sources
,
Springer International Publishing AG
, Berlin, p.
293
.
9.
Canadian Small Modular Reactor Roadmap Steering Committee
,
2018
, “
A Call to Action: A Canadian Roadmap for Small Modular Reactors
,” Canadian Small Modular Reactor Roadmap Steering Committee, Ottawa, ON, Canada, accessed Dec. 1, 2022, https://smrroadmap.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/SMRroadmap_EN_nov6_Web-1.pdf?x64773
10.
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
2021
, “
Benefits and Challenges of Small Modular Fast Reactors: Proceedings of a Technical Meeting
,” IAEA, Vienna, Austria, Report No. IAEA-TECDOC-1972.
11.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
, n.d., “
Pre-Licensing Vendor Design Review
,” accessed Jan. 15,
2023
, http://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/reactors/power-plants/pre-licensing-vendor-design-review/index.cfm
12.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
, n.d., “
Canadian National Report for the Convention on Nuclear Safety—Eighth Report (8.1 (i) Regulatory Readiness for Small Modular Reactors)
,” accessed Jan. 15, 2023, http://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/resources/publications/reports/cns/eighth/index.cfm
13.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
,
2021
, “
CNSC's Role
,” accessed Jan. 15, 2023, https://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/resources/radiation/introduction-to-radiation/cnscs-role.cfm
14.
Moltex Energy
, n.d., “
Reduces Waste
,” accessed Mar. 17,
2023
, https://www.moltexenergy.com/reduces-waste/
15.
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
2013
, “
Evaluation of High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Performance: Benchmark Analysis Related to the PBMR-400, PBMM, GT-MHR, HTR-10 and the ASTRA Critical Facility
,” IAEA, Vienna, Austria, Report No. IAEA-TECDOC-1694.
16.
US Department of Energy
,
2019
, “
TRISO Particles: The Most Robust Nuclear Fuel on Earth
,” accessed Jan. 2, 2023, https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/triso-particles-most-robust-nuclear-fuel-earth
17.
Pioro
,
I.
, ed.,
2023
,
Handbook of Generation IV Nuclear Reactors
, 2nd ed.,
Woodhead Publishing (WP)
,
Kidlington, UK
, p.
1079
.
18.
CNSC,
n.d., “
Small Modular Reactors
,” Canadian nuclear Safety Commissions, Ottawa, ON, Canada, accessed Jan. 10, 2023, https://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/reactors/research-reactors/other-reactor-facilities/small-modular-reactors.cfm
19.
CNSC
,
2017
, “
Stakeholder Workshop Report: Application of the Graded Approach in Regulating Small Modular Reactors
,” Canadian Nuclear Safety Commissions, Ottawa, ON, Canada, accessed Nov. 10, 2022, https://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/acts-and-regulations/consultation/history/workshop-report-regulating-small-modular-reactors.cfm
20.
Antaki
,
G.
, and
Gilada
,
R.
,
2015
,
Nuclear Power Plant Safety and Mechanical Integrity: Design and Operability of Mechanical Systems, Equipment and Supporting Structures
,
Elsevier Science
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p.
337
.
21.
Murray
,
R. L.
, and
Holbert
,
K. E.
,
2020
,
Nuclear Energy: An Introduction to the Concepts, Systems, and Applications of Nuclear Processes
, 8th ed.,
Elsevier
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p.
606
.
22.
Kirillov
,
I. A.
,
Kharitonova
,
N. L.
,
Simonenko
,
V. A.
, and
Bezgodov
,
E. V.
,
2022
, “
Harmonization of Approaches to Evaluation of the Efficiency and Safe Operating Limits of Passive Catalytic Recombiners: System Model
,”
At. Energy
,
131
(
4
), pp.
179
186
.10.1007/s10512-022-00868-2
23.
King
,
L. D. P.
,
1960
, “
Catalytic Recombiner for a Nuclear Reactor
,” U.S. Patent No. US 2943921.
24.
Agrawal
,
N.
,
Ali
,
S. M.
, and
Balasubramaniyan
,
V.
,
2017
, “
Innovative Hydrogen Recombiner Concept for Severe Accident Management in Nuclear Power Plants
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
323
, pp.
359
366
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.03.012
25.
Myers
,
C. W.
,
Elkins
,
N. Z.
,
Kunze
,
J. F.
, and
Mahar
,
J. M.
,
2008
, “
Potential Advantages of Underground Nuclear Parks
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE14-89133.10.1115/ICONE14-89133
26.
Lyczkowski
,
R. W.
, and
Ching
,
J. T.
,
1979
, “
Safety Consideration and Economic Advantage of a New Underground Nuclear Power Plant Design
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
53
(
2
), pp.
257
261
.10.1016/0029-5493(79)90106-7
27.
Qi
,
H.-B.
,
Niu
,
F.-L.
,
Zhao
,
Y.-G.
,
Yu
,
Y.
, and
Wang
,
S.-F.
,
2016
, “
Feasibility of Underground NPP and Its MCDA-Based Optimization
,”
Nucl. Sci. Tech.
,
27
(
4
), pp.
89
95
.10.1007/s41365-016-0080-z
28.
Allen
,
T.
,
Busby
,
J.
,
Meyer
,
M.
, and
Petti
,
D.
,
2010
, “
Materials Challenges for Nuclear Systems
,”
Mater. Today
,
13
(
12
), pp.
14
23
.10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70220-0
29.
US Department of Energy
,
2006
, “
Basic Research Needs for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems
,” accessed Jan. 20, 2023, https://cdn.lanl.gov/files/basic-research-needs-for-advanced-nuclear-energy-systems-rpt_6107b.pdf
30.
Sun
,
L.
,
Mahmoud
,
A.
,
Ding
,
Y.
, and
Yetisir
,
M.
,
2022
, “
Numerical Analysis of Permafrost Heat Transfer for Small Module Reactor Installation in Northern Areas
,”
Int. J. Thermofluids
,
16
, p.
100202
.10.1016/j.ijft.2022.100202
31.
Bernstein
,
A.
,
Bowden
,
N.
,
Misner
,
A.
, and
Palmer
,
T.
,
2008
, “
Monitoring the Thermal Power of Nuclear Reactors With a Prototype Cubic Meter Antineutrino Detector
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
,
103
(
7
), p.
074905
.10.1063/1.2899178
32.
International Atomic Energy Agency,
2008
, “
Final Report: Focused Workshop on Antineutrino Detection for Safeguards Applications
,”
IAEA Headquarters
,
Vienna, Austria
, accessed Jan. 10, 2023, https://www.lefigaro.fr/assets/pdf/AIEA-neutrino.pdf
33.
Middleton
,
B. D.
, and
Mendez
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Integrating Safety, Operations, Security, and Safeguards Into the Design of Small Modular Reactors
,”
ASME
Paper No. SMR2014-3336.10.1115/SMR2014-3336
34.
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
2022
, “
Security Management of Radioactive Material in Use and Storage and of Associated Facilities
,” IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 43‐T, accessed Jan. 23, 2023, https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/PUB1951_web.pdf
35.
Li
,
N.
,
2009
, “
A Paradigm Shift Needed for Nuclear Reactors: From Economics of Unit Scale to Economics of Production Scales
,”
Proceedings of the International Congress on Advanced Power Plant
, Tokyo, Japan, May 10–14.
36.
Slovic
,
P.
,
1987
, “
Perception of Risk
,”
Science
,
236
(
4799
), pp.
280
285
.10.1126/science.3563507
37.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
,
2023
,
Laying the Foundation for New and Advanced Nuclear Reactors in the United States
,
The National Academies Press
,
Washington, DC
,
38.
Lyman
,
E.
,
2021
, “
‘Advanced’ Isn't Always Better: Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors
,” accessed Jan. 15, 2023, https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/advanced-isnt-always-better-full.pdf
39.
Hussein
,
E. M. A.
,
2020
, “
Emerging Small Modular Nuclear Power Reactors: A Critical Review
,”
Phys. Open
,
5
, p.
100038
.10.1016/j.physo.2020.100038
40.
US Department of Energy,
2014
, “
Evaluation Study on Fuel Cycle Options
,” Idaho National Laboratory, Report No. INL/EXT-14-31465.
41.
IAEA, 2009, “Classification of Radioactive Waste. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-1,” International Atomic Energy Agency, accessed Jan. 18, 2023, https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1419_web.pdf
42.
OPG, Bruce Power, NB Power and SaskPower, 2021, “Feasibility of SMR Development and Deployment in Canada,” p.64, accessed June 10, 2023, https://www.opg.com/documents/feasibility-of-smr-development-and-deployment-in-canada-pdf/
43.
Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA),
2016
, “
Small Modular Reactors: Nuclear Energy Market Potential for Near-Term Deployment
,”
OECD Publishing
,
Paris, France
, accessed Jan. 12, 2023, https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_14924/small-modular-reactors-nuclear-energy-market-potential-for-near-term-deployment?details=true
44.
US Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy
,
2016
, “
Nuclear Waste Attributes of SMRs Scheduled for Near-Term Deployment
,” accessed Jan. 11, 2023, https://fuelcycleoptions.inl.gov/SiteAssets/SitePages/Home/SMR_Waste_Attributes_Report_Final.pdf
45.
Kralla
,
L. M.
,
Macfarlane
,
A. M.
, and
Ewing
,
R. C.
,
2022
, “
Nuclear Waste From Small Modular Reactors
,”
Environ. Sci.
,
119
(
23
), pp.
1
12
.10.1073/pnas.2111833119
46.
Nuclear Energy Agency
,
2006
, “
Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Radioactive Waste Management
,”
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
, accessed Jan. 12, 2023, No. NEA—5990, https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_14008/advanced-nuclear-fuel-cycles-and-radioactive-waste-management?details=true
47.
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories
, n.d., “
Canadian Nuclear Research Initiative (CNRI)
,” accessed Mar. 10, 2023, https://www.cnl.ca/clean-energy/canadian-nuclear-research-initiative-cnri/
48.
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories,
n.d., “
Facts on CNL's SMR Program
,” accessed Mar. 10, 2023, https://www.cnl.ca/clean-energy/small-modular-reactors/facts-on-cnls-smr-progr/
49.
Nuclear Engineering International
,
2023
, “
South Korea Seeks to End Dispute With Westinghouse
,” accessed Jan. 12, 2023, https://www.neimagazine.com/news/newssouth-korea-seeks-to-end-dispute-with-westinghouse-10511335
50.
Standing Committee on Science and Research
,
2023
, “
Small Modular Nuclear Reactors: Report of the Standing Committee on Science and Research
,” House of Commons, Ottawa, ON, Canada, accessed Mar. 5, 2023, https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/441/SRSR/Reports/RP12212540/srsrrp03/srsrrp03-e.pdf
51.
Candu Energy
,
2020
, “
SMR: The Original Canadian Solution
,” CANDU Energy, Mississauga, ON, Canada, accessed Jan. 12, 2023, https://www.snclavalin.com/~/media/Files/S/SNC-Lavalin/download-centre/en/brochure/our-candu-smr_en.pdf
52.
Hussein
,
E. M. A.
,
2021
, “
CANDU-Like Features in Emerging Small Modular Reactor Designs
,”
ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci.
,
7
(
3
), p.
034507
.10.1115/1.4050477
53.
SMR Action Plan
,
2022
, “
Canada's SMR Action Plan Progress Update
,” accessed Jan. 12, 2023, https://smractionplan.ca/sites/smractionplan/files/2023-01/full-appoved-progress-update-eng-access.pdf
54.
NucNet
,
2022
, “
Port Authority Announces Plans for ARC-100 SMR at New Brunswick Green Energy Hub
,” accessed Jan. 13, 2023, https://www.nucnet.org/news/port-authority-announces-plans-for-arc-100-smr-at-new-brunswick-green-energy-hub-12-4-2022
55.
Ontario Power Generation (OPG)
,
2022
, “
OPG's Darlington Small Modular Reactor Project Passes Significant Milestones
,” accessed Jan. 12, 2023, https://www.opg.com/stories/opg-advancing-the-clean-promise-of-nuclear-power-with-darlington-smr-project/story/opg-darlington-small-modular-reactor-project-passes-significant-milestones/
56.
GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy
,
2021
, “
GE Hitachi Signs Contract for the First North American Small Modular Reactor
,” accessed Mar. 3, 2023, https://www.ge.com/news/press-releases/ge-hitachi-signs-contract-for-the-first-north-american-small-modular-reactor
57.
SaskPower
,
2022
, “
SaskPower Selects the GE-Hitachi BWRX-300 Small Modular Reactor Technology for Potential Deployment in Saskatchewan
,” accessed Jan. 12, 2023, https://www.saskpower.com/about-us/media-information/news-releases/2022/saskpower-selects-the-ge-hitachi-bwrx-300-smr-technology-for-potential-deployment-in-saskatchewan
58.
SaskPower
,
2023
, “
Planning for Nuclear Power
,” accessed Jan. 12, 2023, https://engage.saskpower.com/planning-for-nuclear-power
59.
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
2020
, “
BWRX-300: Small Modular Reactor Design
,” IAEA, Vienna, Austria, accessed Feb. 12, 2023, https://aris.iaea.org/PDF/BWRX-300_2020.pdf
60.
IAEA
,
2022
, “
Lessons Learned in Regulating Small Modular Reactors: Challenges, Resolutions and Insights
,” International Atomic Energy Agency, accessed Mar. 21, 2023, https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/TE-2003web.pdf
61.
GE Power
, n.d., “
A Legacy of Impact
,” accessed Mar. 9,
2023
, https://nuclear.gepower.com/canada/a-legacy-of-impact
62.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
, n.d., “
Executive Summary: Combined Phases 1 and 2 Pre-Licensing Vendor Design Review—General Electric Hitachi Nuclear Energy
,” accessed Mar. 15,
2023
, https://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/reactors/power-plants/pre-licensing-vendor-design-review/geh-nuclear-energy-executive-summary.cfm
63.
OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
,
2023
, “
The NEA Small Modular Reactor Dashboard
,” accessed Mar. 13, 2023, https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_78743/the-nea-small-modular-reactor-dashboard
64.
SMR Roadmap Secretariat
,
2018
, “
SMR Economics and Finance Working Group Report
,” accessed Mar. 9, 2023, https://smrroadmap.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Economics-Finance-WG.pdf
65.
World Nuclear Association
,
2020
, “
Processing of Used Nuclear Fuel
,” accessed Mar. 9, 2023, https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/fuel-recycling/processing-of-used-nuclear-fuel.aspx
66.
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
2021
, “
Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2050
,” accessed Mar. 9, 2023, https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/RDS-1-42_web.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.