Abstract

Many existing simple systems are incapable of meeting current demand and are quickly becoming obsolete, indicating that more challenging systems and designs will exist in the future. If new technologies are not implemented correctly, human error in operation can quickly manifest. The pattern of human performance degradation when novel technologies are introduced has been found in a wide range of endeavors. For example, the Three Mile Island nuclear accident was a consequence of unanticipated interaction of multiple failures in a system of immense complexity in addition to inadequate training and human factors, such as human–computer interaction design oversight relating to ambiguous control room indicators. To combat the negative effects, advancing technologies may have on plant operations; this study discusses several concepts: operator involvement in the systems engineering process; human performance integration with system operational requirements and system testing, evaluation, and validation; and procedures and training development in the systems engineering process. The isolation and bolstering of human performance improvement within the systems engineering process pose a novel approach to moderating human error associated with incorporating advanced technology in nuclear facilities.

References

1.
Krivit
,
S. B.
,
Lehr
,
J. H.
, and
Kingery
,
T. B.
,
2011
,
Nuclear Energy Encyclopedia
,
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
2.
Perrow
,
C.
,
1999
,
Normal Accidents: Living With High-Risk Technologies
,
Princeton University Press
,
Princeton, NJ
.
3.
Proctor
,
R. W.
, and
Van Zandt
,
T.
,
2008
,
Human Factors in Simple and Complex Systems
, 2nd ed.,
CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
4.
Corrado
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Technological Advances, Human Performance, and the Operation of Nuclear Facilities
,” Ph.D. dissertation,
Colorado State University
, Ft. Collins, CO, ProQuest (AAT 10258407).
5.
Corrado
,
J.
, and
Sega
,
R.
,
2020
, “
Impact of Advancing Technology on Nuclear Facility Operation
,”
ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part B: Mech. Eng.
,
6
(
1
), p.
011002
.
6.
Mallard
,
D.
,
2016
, “The Human Factor in Safety & Operation,”
EHS Today
, accessed Feb. 24, 2020, https://www.ehstoday.com/training-and-engagement/article/21917614/the-human-factor-in-safety-and-operations
7.
Sehgal
,
B. R.
, ed.,
2012
,
Nuclear Safety in Light Water Reactors: Severe Accident Phenomenology
,
Elsevier/Academic Press
,
Waltham, MA
.
8.
Woods
,
D. D.
,
Dekker
,
S.
,
Cook
,
R.
,
Johannesen
,
L.
, and
Sarter
,
N.
,
2010
, “
Behind Human Error
,”
Ashgate
,
Farnham, UK
.
9.
Carayannis
,
E.
, and
Coleman
,
J.
,
2005
, “
Creative Systems Design Methodologies: The Case of Complex Technical Systems
,”
Int. J. Technol.
, (
3
), p.
25
.10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.012
10.
Blanchard
,
B.
, and
Fabrycky
,
W.
,
2011
,
Systems Engineering and Analysis
, 5th ed.,
Pearson Education
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
.
11.
U.S. Department of Energy,
2009
,
Human Performance Improvement Handbook
,
Doe-Hdbk-1028-2009
,
Washington, DC
.
12.
Reason
,
J.
,
1990
,
Human Error
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
13.
Karwowski
,
W.
,
2006
,
International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors
, 2nd ed.,
CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
You do not currently have access to this content.