Abstract

The utility industry is currently undergoing a substantial change from analogue to digital infrastructure. Not only plant performance and utility profits are dependent on accurate plant operational parameters but, more importantly, set safety limits need to be met in order to ensure safe operation of nuclear power plants in particular. Using nonquality-assured process data for operational decisions can result in significant over- or under-power events in the plant. In addition, all new technologies such as AI, IIoT, and digital twin technology rely on robust process data as input, putting at risk the significance of the results from the continuing data processing (“garbage in, garbage out”). One method, certified process data reconciliation, or certified process data reconciliation (CPDR), cuts through the vast amount of available process data and generates all relevant process values with the smallest uncertainty possible. In addition, 95% of all collected process data can be discarded after introduction of CPDR. With CPDR, plant operation and maintenance can be significantly optimized and utilities can profit by realizing, e.g., power recovery and measurement uncertainty recapture (MUR). Because the focus on reconciled instead of measured values constitutes a paradigm shift, the application of CPDR needs to be communicated to nuclear regulators. This paper describes the approach and experience of the regulator acceptance process in various countries around the globe.

References

1.
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI),
2017
, “
Control and Quality Improvement of process data and Their Uncertainties by Means of Correction Calculation for Operation and Acceptance Tests
,” VDI, Düsseldorf, Germany, Standard No. VDI 2048 Part 1.
2.
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI),
2018
, “
Control and Quality Improvement of process data and Their Uncertainties by Means of Correction Calculation for Operation and Acceptance Tests—Examples, Especially Retrofit Measures
,” VDI, Düsseldorf, Germany, Standard No. VDI 2048 Part 2.
3.
BTB Jansky GmbH
,
2021
, “
ProcessPLUS Core 6.03 GUI
,” BTB Jansky GmbH, Leonberg, Germany.
4.
Fendt
,
H.
,
2010
, “
Implementation of Correction Factors Based on Reconciled Data -TÜV-Qualification, Implementation and Benefits at NPP Gundremmingen B+C
,”
ProcessPLUS Users Group Meeting, Hamburg
, June 2010, p. 32.
5.
Wiik
,
A.
, and
Adolfsson
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Status of ProcessPLUS at NPP Forsmark Units 1-3 (BWRs) and Next Steps
,”
ProcessPLUS Users Group Meeting, Amsterdam
, The Netherlands, June 2016, p.
9
.
You do not currently have access to this content.