Abstract

Following up the previous collaborative project on European sodium fast reactor (CP-ESFR project), the European sodium fast reactor—safety measures assessment and research tools (ESFR-SMART project) considers the safety objectives envisaged for generation-IV reactors, taking into account the lessons learned from the Fukushima accident, in order to increase the ESFR safety level. In accordance with these objectives, guidelines have been defined to drive the ESFR-SMART developments, mainly simplifying the design and using all the positive features of sodium fast reactors (SFR), such as low coolant pressure, efficiency of natural convection, possibility of decay heat removal (DHR) by atmospheric air, high thermal inertia, and long grace period before a human intervention is needed. In this paper, a set of new ambitious safety measures is introduced for further evaluation within the project. The proposed set aims at consistency with the main lines of safety evolutions since the Fukushima accident. The paper gives a first review of the new propositions to enhance the ESFR safety, leading to a simplified reactor, forgiving and including a lot of passivity. This first version is supported by the various project tasks in order to assess the relevance of the whole design in comparison to the final safety objectives.

References

1.
EFR Associates
,
1998
, “
European Fast Reactor: Outcome of Design Studies
,” brochure EFR Associates, Lyon, France.
2.
Fiorini
,
G. L.
, and
Vasile
,
A.
,
2011
, “
European Commission—7th Framework Programme, The Collaborative Project on European Sodium Fast Reactor (CP ESFR)
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
241
(
9
), pp.
3461
3469
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.01.052
3.
Mikityuk
,
K.
,
Girardi
,
E.
,
Krepel
,
J.
,
Bubelis
,
E.
,
Fridman
,
E.
,
Rineiski
,
A.
,
Girault
,
N.
,
Payot
,
F.
,
Buligins
,
L.
,
Gerbeth
,
G.
,
Chauvin
,
N.
,
Latge
, C., and
Garnier
,
J. C.
,
2017
, “
ESFR-SMART: New Horizon-2020 Project on SFR Safety
,”
Proceedings of International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Next Generation Nuclear Systems for Sustainable, Development (FR17)
, Yekaterinburg, Russia, June 26–29, IAEA-CN245-450, p.
17
.https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/psi/islandora/object/psi%3A23286
4.
WENRA
,
2013
, “
Safety of new Nuclear Power Plant Designs
,” Report of WENRA, RHWG (Reactor Harmonization Working Group).
5.
The Generation IV International Forum: The Safety Design Criteria Task Force (SDC-TF)
,
2017
, “
Safety Design Criteria for Generation IV Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor System (Rev. 1)
,” Report No. SDC-TF/2017/02, p.
91
, accessed June 21, 2021, https://www.gen-4.org/gif/upload/docs/application/pdf/2018-06/gif_sdc_report_rev1-sept30-2017_afteregpg20171024a.pdf
6.
IRSN
,
2015
, “
Review of Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems
,” IRSN, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France, Report N° 04-2015, p.
239
, accessed June 21, 2021, https://www.irsn.fr/EN/newsroom/News/Documents/IRSN_Report-GenIV_04-2015.pdf
7.
Rineiski
,
A.
,
Mériot
,
C.
,
Marchetti
,
M.
,
Krepel
,
J.
,
Coquelet-Pascal
,
C.
,
Tsige-Tamirat
,
H.
,
Alvarez-Velarde
,
F.
,
Girardi
,
E.
, and
Mikityuk
,
K.
,
2021
, “
New ESFR-SMART Core Safety Measures and Their Preliminary Assessment
,” ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Rad. Sci., p.
26
(accepted to).
8.
Guidez
,
J.
, and
Prêle
,
G.
,
2017
,
Superphénix. Technical and Scientific Achievements
,
Atlantis Press
, Paris, France, p.
342
.
9.
Guidez
,
J.
,
2014
,
Phénix Experience Feedback
,
EDP Sciences
, Les Ulis, France, p.
300
.
10.
Guidez
,
J.
, and
Saturnin
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Evolution of the Collective Radiation Dose of Nuclear Reactors From the 2nd Through to the 3rd Generation and Generation-IV Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors
,”
Proceedings of International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Next Generation Nuclear Systems for Sustainable, Development (FR17)
, Yekaterinburg, Russia, June 26–29, Paper No. IAEA-CN245-016, p.
12
.
11.
IAEA,
2020
, “
Passive Shutdown Systems for Fast Neutron Reactors
,” IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NR-T-1.16, Vienna, Austria, accessed June 21, 2021, https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/P1863E_web.pdf
12.
Sedakov
,
V. Y.
,
Lyubimov
,
M. A.
,
Shkarin
,
V. I.
, and
Shokhonov
,
V. P.
,
2017
, “
Manufacture, Installation and Adjustment of BN-800 RP Equipment
,”
Proceedings of International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Next Generation Nuclear Systems for Sustainable, Development (FR17)
, Yekaterinburg, Russia, June 26–29, Report No. IAEA-CN245-425, p.
10
.
13.
Baldev
,
R.
,
Chellapandi
,
P.
, and
Vasudeva Rao
,
P. R.
,
2017
,
Sodium Fast Reactors With Closed Fuel Cycle
,
CRC Press
, Boca Raton, FL, p.
720
.
14.
IAEA-TECDOC,
2012
, Status of Fast Reactor Research and Technology Development, TECDOC Series,
IAEA
,
Vienna, Austria
, Report No. IAEA-TECDOC-1691, p.
846
, accessed June 21, 2021, https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/TE_1691_CD/PDF/IAEA-TECDOC-1691.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.