Abstract

This paper presents static and transient solutions for the pressurized water reactor (PWR) MOX/UO2 transient benchmark by Serpent 2 Monte Carlo (MC) code and open nodal core simulator called Abu Dhabi Polytechnic Reactor Simulator (ADPRES). The presence of mixed oxide (MOX) fuels and burn-up variation in the benchmark pose challenges for reactor simulators due to severe flux gradient across fuel assemblies. In this work, the two-step method was used, in which the assembly level two-group constants were generated from single assembly calculations with zero net current boundary conditions using Serpent 2 Monte Carlo code, and later the core calculation was performed using ADPRES open nodal core simulator. Two types of diffusion coefficients were generated: the conventional B1 leakage corrected and the cumulative migration method (CMM). Finally, the solutions of Serpent 2/ADPRES, including multiplication factor, power distribution, control rod (CR) worth, and critical boron concentration (CBC) using both diffusion coefficients, were compared against solutions from heterogeneous Serpent 2 calculations where the fuel and cladding are explicitly modeled. The reactor power during transients was also compared qualitatively against other nodal core simulators. The results showed that Serpent 2/ADPRES were able to predict the heterogeneous Monte Carlo solutions very well with reasonable differences. The transient solutions were also quite accurate compared to other nodal core simulators. For the diffusion coefficients comparison, it was found that the CMM diffusion coefficient provides more accurate solutions for the benchmark compared to the B1 leakage corrected diffusion coefficients.

References

1.
Redmond
,
E. L.
, II
,
1997
, “Multigroup Cross Section Generation Via Monte Carlo Methods,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Nuclear Engineering,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
, Cambridge, MA, p.
172
.
2.
Tohjoh
,
M.
,
Watanabe
,
M.
, and
Yamamoto
,
A.
,
2005
, “
Application of Continuous-Energy Monte Carlo Code as a Cross-Section Generator of BWR Core Calculations
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
32
(
8
), pp.
857
875
.10.1016/j.anucene.2005.01.002
3.
Leppänen
,
J.
,
Mattila
,
R.
, and
Pusa
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Validation of the Serpent-ARES Code Sequence Using the MIT BEAVRS Benchmark—Initial Core at HZP Conditions
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
69
, pp.
212
225
.10.1016/j.anucene.2014.02.014
4.
Park
,
H. J.
,
Shim
,
H. J.
,
Joo
,
H. G.
, and
Kim
,
C. H.
,
2012
, “
Generation of Few-Group Diffusion Theory Constants by Monte Carlo Code McCARD
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
,
172
(
1
), pp.
66
77
.10.13182/NSE11-22
5.
Leppänen
,
J.
,
Pusa
,
M.
,
Viitanen
,
T.
,
Valtavirta
,
V.
, and
Kaltiaisenaho
,
T.
,
2015
, “
The Serpent Monte Carlo Code: Status, Development and Applications in 2013
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
82
, pp.
142
150
.10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.024
6.
Romano
,
P. K.
, and
Forget
,
B.
,
2013
, “
The OpenMC Monte Carlo Particle Transport Code
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
51
, pp.
274
281
.10.1016/j.anucene.2012.06.040
7.
Smith
,
K. S.
,
2017
, “
Nodal Diffusion Methods and Lattice Physics Data in LWR Analyses: Understanding Numerous Subtle Details
,”
Prog. Nucl. Energy
,
101
, pp.
360
369
.10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.06.013
8.
Kozlowski
,
T.
,
Downar
,
T. J.
,
2007
, “
PWR MOX/UO2 Core Transient Benchmark Final Report”, NEA/NSC/DOC(2006)20, Nuclear Energy Agency Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development
, Paris, France, NEA No. 6048.
9.
Imron
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Development and Verification of Open Reactor Simulator ADPRES
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
133
, pp.
580
588
.10.1016/j.anucene.2019.06.049
10.
Imron
,
M.
,
2019
, “
ADPRES Open Nuclear Reactor Core Simulator
,” Github, Github Repositories, Accessed Sept. 8, 2019, https://github.com/imronuke/ADPRES
11.
Leppänen
,
J.
,
Pusa
,
M.
, and
Fridman
,
E.
,
2016
, “
Overview of Methodology for Spatial Homogenization in the Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
96
, pp.
126
136
.10.1016/j.anucene.2016.06.007
12.
Liu
,
Z.
,
Smith
,
K.
,
Forget
,
B.
, and
Ortensi
,
J.
,
2018
, “
Cumulative Migration Method for Computing Rigorous Diffusion Coefficients and Transport Cross Sections From Monte Carlo
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
112
, pp.
507
516
.10.1016/j.anucene.2017.10.039
13.
Imron
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Development of Open Reactor Simulator: ADPRES
,”
Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE27)
, Tsukuba, Japan, May 19–24, 2019, Paper No. 1218.
14.
Zimin
,
V. G.
, and
Ninokata
,
H.
,
1998
, “
Nodal Neutron Kinetics Model Based on Nonlinear Iteration Procedure for LWR Analysis
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
25
(
8
), pp.
507
528
.10.1016/S0306-4549(97)00078-9
15.
Smith
,
K.
,
1983
, “
Nodal Method Storage Reduction by Nonlinear Iteration
,”
Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc.
,
44
, pp.
265
266
.
16.
Hendricks
,
J. S.
,
1975
, “Finite Difference Solution of the Time Dependent Neutron Group Diffusion Equations,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Nuclear Engineering,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
, Cambridge, MA, p.
201
.
17.
Daeubler
,
M.
,
Ivanov
,
A.
,
Sjenitzer
,
B. L.
,
Sanchez
,
V.
,
Stieglitz
,
R.
, and
Macian-Juan
,
R.
,
2015
, “
High-Fidelity Coupled Monte Carlo Neutron Transport and Thermal-Hydraulic Simulations Using Serpent 2/SUBCHANFLOW
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
83
, pp.
352
375
.10.1016/j.anucene.2015.03.040
You do not currently have access to this content.