Abstract

A novel method of assessing the reliability of 37-element Canada deuterium uranium (reactor) (CANDU) fuel bundle was explored. The method implements a “best-estimate plus uncertainty” (BEPU) approach where a probabilistic treatment of manufacturing and operating inputs is used to predict fuel performance. The fuel performance was predicted using the Canadian industry standard codes for fuel performance, ELESTRESS and ELOCA, which, respectively, model fuel behaviors during normal and transient conditions. The outputs of the codes were compared against failure criteria from industry norms to determine the probability of failure. A Monte Carlo simulation method was applied to analyze this problem. Probability distributions of manufacturing input variables were estimated from real data, which were then randomly sampled. The inputs for fuel burnup and power were simulated using core-following data generated using a three-dimensional diffusion code, the Reactor Fuelling Simulation Program (RFSP), which were also then randomly sampled. The results of the simulations predict significant improvements in margins to limits for all performance parameters. An average improvement of 500 °C in centerline temperature, 10 °C in sheath temperature, 12 MPa in element internal pressure, and 0.8% in pellet end sheath hoop strain was predicted for the highest-powered region of the core, during normal operations, in comparison with the limit-of-envelope (LOE) benchmark. An 80% reactor overhead break (ROH) transient simulation was also simulated, and an average improvement of 500 °C in centerline temperature, 150 °C in sheath temperature, 6.5 MPa in internal pressure, and 2% in sheath hoop strain was predicted.

References

1.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
,
2014
, “
Deterministic Safety Analysis
,”
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
,
Ottawa, ON, Canada
, Document No. CNSC-REGDOC-2.4.1.
2.
IAEA,
2008
, “
Best Estimate Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants: Uncertainty Evaluation, Final Report of Coordinated Research Project
,”
IAEA
,
Vienna, Austria
, Report No. IAEA-STI-PUB-1306.
3.
Shen
,
W.
, and
Doyle
,
F.
,
2015
, “
CANDU Safety R&D Status, Challenges, and Prospects in Canada
,”
Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install.
,
2015
(
2015
), p.
143767
.10.1155/2015/143767
4.
IAEA
,
2003
, “
Safety Margins of Operating Reactors: Analysis of Uncertainties and Implications for Decision Making
,”
IAEA
,
Vienna, Austria
, Report No. IAEA-TECDOC-1332.
5.
Ivanov
,
E.
,
Dubois
,
F.
,
Sargeni
,
A.
, and
Bruna
,
G. B.
,
2019
, “
Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU), Why is It Still Not Widely Used
,”
J. Nucl. Technol.
,
205
(
12
), pp.
1529
1539
.10.1080/00295450.2019.1627122
6.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission,
2014
, “
Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) for Nuclear Power Plants
,”
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
,
Ottawa, ON, Canada
, Document No. CNSC-REGDOC-2.4.2.
7.
IAEA
,
2010
, “
Development and Application of Level 1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants, Final Report of Coordinated Research Project
,”
IAEA
,
Vienna, Austria
, Report No. IAEA-STI-PUB-1430.
8.
IAEA
,
2010
, “
Development and Application of Level 2 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants
,”
IAEA
,
Vienna, Austria
, Report No. IAEA-STI-PUB-1443.
9.
World Association of Nuclear Operators
,
2018
, “
Performance Indicators
,”
WANO
,
London, UK
, accessed Oct. 30, 2019, https://www.wano.info/getmedia/b0263347-91ff-4034-88ba-8746a66d6574/WANO-Performance-Indicator-Trifold-English-SCREEN-(single-pages).pdf.aspx
10.
Cunning
,
T. A.
,
Chan
,
P.
,
Pandey
,
M. D.
, and
Pant
,
A.
,
2014
, “
An Examination of CANDU Fuel Performance Margins Derived From a Statistical Assessment of Industrial Manufacturing Data
,”
J. Nucl. Technol.
,
187
(
3
), pp.
270
281
.10.13182/NT13-126
11.
Schwanke
,
P.
,
2006
, “
RFSP-IST Version REL_3-04: User's Manual
,”
CANDU Owners Group
,
Mississauga, ON, Canada
, Document Nos. SQAD-06-5054, 153-117360-UM-002.
12.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
,
2017
, “
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission License Conditions Handbook: Darlington Nuclear Generating Station Nuclear Power Reactor Operating License
,”
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
,
Ottawa, ON, Canada
, Document No. CNSC-LCH-PR-13.01/2025-R002.
13.
The MathWorks
,
2013
, “
MATLAB, 8.1.0.604 (R2013a)
,”
The MathWorks
,
Natick, MA
.
14.
Song
,
J.
,
Chan
,
P.
,
Bonin
,
H.
, and
Paquette
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Fuelling Study of a CANDU Reactor Using Fuels Containing Burnable Neutron Absorbers
,”
J. Nucl. Technol.
,
195
(
3
), pp.
310
328
.10.13182/NT16-1
15.
Rouben
,
B.
,
1999
, “
Fuel Management in CANDU, CANDU Fuel Management Course
,”
Atomic Energy of Canada
,
Mississauga, ON, Canada
, accessed Nov. 10, 2019, https://canteach.candu.org/Content%20Library/20031101.pdf
16.
Jonkmans
,
G.
,
2006
, “
WIMS-AECL Version 3.1 User's Manual
,”
CANDU Owners Group
,
Mississauga, ON, Canada
, Document No. ISTP-05-5115.
17.
Ovanes
,
M.
, and
Donnelly
,
J. V.
,
2000
, “
Validation of 3-Dimensional Neutron-Transport Calculations of CANDU Reactivity Device
,”
Proceedings of 21st Canadian Nuclear Society Nuclear Simulation Symposium
,
Ottawa, ON, Canada
, Sept. 24–26, p.
11
.https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0236/ML023600322.pdf
18.
Pierce
,
D.
,
2017
, “
Mitigation of End-Flux Peaking in CANDU Fuel Bundles Using Neutron Absorbers
,”
Master's thesis
,
Royal Military College of Canada
,
Kingston, ON, Canada
.https://espace.rmc.ca/bitstream/11264/1361/1/MastersThesis_DPierce.pdf
19.
Chassie
,
G. G.
,
2006
, “
ELESTRES-IST 1.2 Theory Manual
,”
CANDU Owners Group
,
Mississauga, ON, Canada
, Document No. 153-113370-STM-001.
20.
Caswell
,
D. J.
,
Williams
,
A. F.
, and
Richmond
,
W. R.
,
2005
, “
ELOCA 2.2 User's Manual
,”
CANDU Owners Group
,
Mississauga, ON, Canada
, Document No. 153-113400-UM-001.
21.
Song
,
W.
, and
Manzer
,
A. M.
,
1999
, “
Design and Performance of Fuel for Qinshan Phase-III CANDU Reactor
,”
China J. Nucl. Power Eng.
,
20
(
6
), pp.
526
530
.
22.
Hallgrimson
,
K.
,
Tayal
,
M.
,
Wong
,
B.
, and
Aboud
,
R.
,
1992
, “
Recent Validations of the ELESTRES Code
,”
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited
,
Sheridan Park, ON, Canada
, IAEA Report No. INIS-MF-14346.
23.
Walker
,
J. R.
,
De Vaal
,
J. W.
,
Arimescu
,
V. I.
,
McGrady
,
T. G.
, and
Wong
,
C.
,
1992
, “
Use of ELOCA.Mk5 to Calculate Transient Fission Product Release From CANDU Fuel Elements
,”
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited
,
Chalk River, ON, Canada
, IAEA Report No. AECL-10591.
You do not currently have access to this content.