Probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) analysis is expected to be a rational method for structural integrity assessment because it can consider the uncertainties of various influence factors and evaluate the quantitative values such as failure probability of a cracked component as the solution. In the Japan Atomic Energy Agency, a PFM analysis code PASCAL-SP has been developed for structural integrity assessment of piping welds in nuclear power plants (NPP). In the past few decades, a number of cracks due to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) have been detected in nickel-based alloy welds in the primary piping of pressurized water reactors (PWRs). Thus, structural integrity assessments considering PWSCC have become important. In this study, PASCAL-SP was improved considering PWSCC by introducing several analytical functions such as the models for evaluation of crack initiation time, crack growth rate (CGR), and probability of crack detection. By using the improved version of PASCAL-SP, the failure probabilities of pipes with a circumferential crack or an axial crack due to PWSCC were numerically evaluated. Moreover, the influence of leak detection and nondestructive examination (NDE) on failure probabilities was detected. Based on the obtained numerical results, it was concluded that the improved version of PASCAL-SP is useful for evaluating the failure probability of a pipe considering PWSCC.

References

References
1.
JSME
,
2012
, “
JSME Codes for Nuclear Power Generation Facilities—Rules on Fitness-for-Service for Nuclear Power Plant
,” Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
2.
Itoh
,
H.
,
Kato
,
D.
,
Osakabe
,
K.
,
Nishikawa
,
H.
, and
Onizawa
,
K.
,
2010
, “
User's Manuals of Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis Code for Aged Piping, PASCAL-SP
,” Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Japan, JAEA-Data/Code 2009-025 (in Japanese).
3.
Katsuyama
,
J.
,
Itoh
,
H.
,
Li
,
Y.
,
Osakabe
,
K.
,
Onizawa
,
K.
, and
Yoshimura
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Benchmark Analysis on Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis Codes Concerning Fatigue Crack Growth in Aged Piping of Nuclear Power Plants
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
117–118
, pp.
56
63
.
4.
Arakawa
,
M.
,
Machida
,
H.
,
Narumi
,
K.
, and
Onizawa
,
K.
,
2011
, “
Benchmark Analysis on the Failure Probability Assessment of Piping With Stress Corrosion Cracking
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2011-57498.
5.
Hojo
,
K.
,
Hayashi
,
S.
,
Nishi
,
W.
,
Kamaya
,
M.
,
Katsuyama
,
J.
,
Masaki
,
K.
,
Nagai
,
M.
,
Okamoto
,
T.
,
Takeda
,
Y.
, and
Yoshimura
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Benchmark Analysis of Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics for Cast Stainless Steel Pipe
,”
Bull. JSME Mech. Eng. J.
,
3
(
4
), p. 16-00083.
6.
Udagawa
,
M.
,
Katsuyama
,
J.
, and
Onizawa
,
K.
,
2013
, “
User's Manuals of Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis Code for Ni-Based Alloy Welds, PASCAL-NP
,” Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokyo, Japan, Report No. JAEA-Data/Code 2013-013 (in Japanese).
7.
ASME
,
2015
, “
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XI Rules for In-Service Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No.
BPVC-XI-2015
. https://www.asme.org/products/codes-standards/bpvcxi-2015-bpvc-section-xirules-inservice
8.
Harris
,
D. O.
,
Dedhia
,
D.
, and
Lu
,
S. C.
,
1992
, “
Theoretical and User's Manual for PC-PRAISE, A Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Computer Code for Piping Reliability Analysis
,” Engineering Mechanics Technology, Inc., San Jose, CA, Report No.
NUREG/CR-5864
.https://www.osti.gov/biblio/10162360-theoretical-user-manual-pc-praise-probabilistic-fracture-mechanics-computer-code-piping-reliability-analysis
9.
JSME
,
2002
, “
Codes for Nuclear Power Generation Facilities—Rules on Protection Design Against Postulated Pipe Rupture for Nuclear Power Plants
,” Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, Standard No. JSME S ND1-2002 (in Japanese).
10.
Amzallag
,
C.
,
Hong
,
S. L.
,
Pages
,
C.
, and
Gelpi
,
A.
,
1999
, “
Stress Corrosion Life Assessment of Alloy 600 PWR Components
,”
Ninth International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors
, F. P. Ford, S. M. Bremer, and G. S. Was, eds., Newport Beach, CA, Aug. 1–5, pp.
243
250
.
11.
Rudland, D., 2011, “xLPR Version 1.0 Report - Technical Basis and Pilot Study Problem Results,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, ADAMS Accession No.
ML110660292
. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1106/ML110660292.pdf
12.
JSME
,
2010
, “
JSME Code Case—SCC Crack Growth Rate of High Nickel Alloy in PWR Primary Water Environment
,” Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, Standard No. JSME S NA1-2008 NA-CC-006 (in Japanese).
13.
JSME
,
2010
, “
JSME Code Case—Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of High Nickel Alloy in Primary Water Environment
,” Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, Standard No. JSME S NA1-2008 NA-CC-004 (in Japanese).
14.
Bamford
,
W. H.
,
1980
, “
Technical Basis for Revised Reference Crack Growth Rate Curves for Pressure Boundary Steels in LWR Environment
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
102
(
4
), pp.
433
442
.
15.
Hunt
,
S.
,
Broussard
,
J.
,
O'Regan
,
P.
, and
Covill
,
D.
,
2005
, “
Weld Overlay Deposit on Alloy 82/182 Butt Welds to Reduce ID Surface Stresses, Proceedings of the Conference on Vessel Penetration Inspection, Crack Growth and Repair
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, Report No. NUREG/CP-0191.
16.
AFCEN
,
2012
, “
RCC-MRx Code—Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Components of Nuclear Installations
,” AFCEN, Paris, France, Standard No. RCC-MRx 2012.
17.
Li
,
Y.
,
Doi
,
H.
,
Hasegawa
,
K.
,
Osakabe
,
K.
, and
Okada
,
H.
,
2013
, “
Stress Intensity Factors for Cracks With Large Aspect Ratio in Cylinder
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2013-97665.
18.
Zahoor
,
A.
,
1989
, “Ductile Fracture Handbook,”
Electric Power Research Institute
, Palo Alto, CA, Report No.
NP-6301-D V3
. https://www.scribd.com/document/355828169/Ductile-Fracture-Handbook
19.
EPRI
,
2009
, “
Material Reliability Program: Development of Probability of Detection Curves for Ultrasonic Examination of Dissimilar Metal Welds
,” Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, Report No. MRP-262 Revision 1.
20.
Fredette
,
L. F.
,
Scott
,
P. M.
,
Brust
,
F. W.
, and
Csontos
,
A.
,
2009
, “
An Analytical Evaluation of the Full Structural Weld Overlay as a Stress Improving Mitigation Strategy to Prevent Primary Stress Corrosion Cracking in Pressurized Water Reactor Piping
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2009-77327.
21.
Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization
,
2009
, “
Technical Document About Improvement of Analytical Methodology for Failure Probability of Structures and Components Due to Seismic Stress Considering Aging Effect
,” Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
22.
JSME
,
2008
, “
Codes for Nuclear Power Generation Facilities—Rules on Protection Design and Construction for Nuclear Power Plants
,” Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, Standard No. JSME S NC1-2008 (in Japanese).
23.
Shim
,
D. J.
,
Xu
,
S.
, and
Lee
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Closed-Form Stress Intensity Factor Solutions for Circumferential Through-Wall Cracks in Cylinder
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2014-28049.
24.
Kupperman
,
D. S.
,
Sheen
,
S. H.
,
Shack
,
W. J.
,
Diercks
,
D. R.
,
Krishnaswamy
,
P.
,
Rudland
,
D.
, and
Wilkowski
,
G. M.
,
2001
, “
Barrier Integrity Research Program: Final Report
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, Report No.
NUREG/CR-6861
.https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0435/ML043580207.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.