Nuclear energy has created controversy since its conception during the 1950s. Arguments against it have been constant through the years until the current state on which the majority of western societies are against it as seen in recent surveys. Additionally, confidence in science and scientists is also relatively low. In Spain, these two facts are related with science alphabetization; an average person with lower science alphabetization tends to be more negative about science, and specifically, about nuclear energy science. In this aspect, as science affects major decisions in society, in democracy, it is important that the public is able to interpret scientific information. It is in this context that Jóvenes Nucleares appeared: an organization created by the Spanish Nuclear Society and formed by young people interested in nuclear energy. One of its main goals was the spreading of nuclear science into society. This was made through lectures at high schools, content creation, and enveloping communication campaigns. A skeptical approach has always been taken trying to separate from the lobby argumentation and promoting a strong critical thought. In this paper, as an example of communication campaign, the Basic Nuclear Fusion Course is presented. This campaign involved the creation of the informative content, gathering it into a book, the development of a lecture (consisting of nine topics related to nuclear fusion) to be delivered in universities or high schools, and a strong advertisement effort through social media and presentations in congresses. This campaign has been possible thanks to voluntary work; the main cost of the campaign was the book printing. The early results predict a great support to this new format included into the Jóvenes Nucleares divulgation activities as perceived in the attendance and feedback provided by the audience. With these activities, Jóvenes Nucleares aspires to put another grain of sand toward narrowing the gap between science and society.

References

References
1.
European Commission
,
2010
, “Special Eurobarometer 324: Europeans and Nuclear Safety Report, European Union,” European Union, City of Brussels, Belgium, accessed Dec. 14, 2018, http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_324_en.pdf
2.
Kim
,
Y.
,
Kim
,
M.
, and
Kim
,
W.
,
2013
, “
Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster on Global Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy
,”
Energy Policy
,
61
, pp.
822
828
.
3.
Osborne
,
J.
,
2000
, “
Science for Citizenship
,”
Good Practice in Science Teaching: What Research Has to Say
,
McGraw-Hill Education
,
Maidenhead, UK
, p.
341
.
4.
Ulrich
,
B.
,
1986
,
Risikogesellschaft. Auf Dem Weg in Eine Andere Moderne
,
Suhrkamp Verlag, Berlin
, p.
396
.
5.
Benneworth
,
P. S.
,
2009
,
The Challenges for 21st Century Science: A Review of the Evidence Base Surrounding the Value of Public Engagement by Scientists
,
Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT)
,
Enschede, The Netherlands
, p.
48
.
6.
Bultitude
,
K.
,
2011
, “
The Why and How of Science Communication
,” Science Communication, European Commission, Pilsen, Czech Republic, accessed Dec. 14, 2018, https://www.scifode-foundation.org/attachments/article/38/Karen_Bultitude_-_Science_Communication_Why_and_How.pdf
7.
European Commission
,
2010
, “
Special Eurobarometer 340: Science and Technology Report, European Union
,” European Union, City of Brussels, Belgium, accessed Dec. 14, 2018, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_340_en.pdf
8.
Siegel
,
E.
,
2014
, “
How to Fool the World With Bad Science
,” Medium Corporation, San Francisco, CA, accessed Feb. 1, 2018. https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/how-to-fool-the-world-with-bad-science-7a9318dd1ae6
9.
Leiserowitz
,
A. A.
,
Maibach
,
E. W.
,
Roser-Renouf
,
C.
,
Smith
,
N.
, and
Dawson
,
E.
,
2013
, “
Climategate, Public Opinion, and the Loss of Trust
,”
Am. Behav. Sci.
,
57
(
6
), pp.
818
837
.
10.
Perko
,
T.
,
Prezelj
,
I.
,
Cantone
,
M. C.
,
Oughton
,
D. H.
,
Tomkiv
,
Y.
, and
Gallego
,
E.
,
2018
, “
Fukushima Through the Prism of Chernobyl: How Newspapers in Europe and Russia Used Past Nuclear Accidents
,”
Environ. Commun.
(epub).
11.
Orlowski
,
A.
,
2008
, “
Greenpeace on Fusion: Whatever It Is, We're Against It
,” Situation Publishing, Southport, London, accessed Feb 1, 2018. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/22/fusion_greenpeace_no/
12.
Española
,
R. E.
,
2017
, Report: El Sistema Eléctrico Español—Avance 2017 (Spanish), Red Eléctrica, Community of Madrid, Spain.
13.
FECYT
,
2017
, “
Report: Percepción Social de La Ciencia y La Tecnología 2016, Language: Spanish, Ministerio de Economía, industria y Competitividad (Spanish)
,” Ministerio de economía, industria y competitividad, Spain.
14.
Gallup
,
2018
, “
Nuclear Energy Poll
,” Gallup, Washington, DC, accessed Feb. 1, 2018, http://news.gallup.com/poll/2167/energy.aspx
15.
IPSOS
,
2015
, “
Report: Encuesta de Opinión Pública Sobre La Energía Nuclear (Spanish)
,” Foro Nuclear, Madrid, Spain.
16.
Kumlin
,
S.
,
2001
, “
Ideology-Driven Opinion Formation in Europe: The Case of Attitudes Towards the Third Sector in Sweden
,”
Eur. J. Political Res.
,
39
(
4
), pp.
487
518
.
17.
Gauchat
,
G.
,
2012
, “
Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010
,”
Am. Sociol. Rev.
,
77
(
2
), pp.
167
187
.
18.
Urbina
,
E. C.
,
2017
, “
Nuclear Power in Spain and the Common Good: The Dialogue as a Communicative Proposal for Social Acceptance
,”
Ruta Comunicacion
,
8
, pp.
27
44
(Spanish).https://revistes.uab.cat/rutacom/article/view/n8-cobos/17-pdf-es
19.
Xiuju
,
L.
,
Hongbin
,
G.
, and
Fujun
,
R.
,
2010
, “
The Analysis Study of Chinese Public Attitudes Towards Science and Technology From 2010 Civic Scientific Literacy Survey in China
,”
11th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology
,
New Delhi, India
,
Dec. 6–10
, pp.
233
235.
20.
Wang
,
B.
,
Yu
,
H.
, and
Wei
,
Y. M.
,
2013
, “
Impact Factors of Public Attitudes Towards Nuclear Power Development: A Questionnaire Survey in China
,”
Int. J. Global Energy Issues
,
36
(
1
), p.
61
.
21.
Pérez
,
S.
,
2007
, “
Curso Básico de Ciencia y Tecnología Nuclear
,” Senda Editorial, Spain.
22.
Fernández-Cosials
,
K.
, and
Barbas
,
A.
,
2017
, Curso Básico de Fusión Nuclear, Spanish Nuclear Society, Madrid, Spain.
23.
Brundtland
,
G.
,
Khalid
,
M.
,
Agnelli
,
S.
,
Al-Athel
,
S.
,
B.
,
Chidzero
,
L.
,
Fadika
,
V.
,
Hauff
,
I.
,
Lang
,
M.
,
Shijun
,
M. M.
,
de Botero
,
M.
, and
Singh
,
S. O.
,
1987
,
Our Common Future
,
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
.
24.
Fernández-Cosials
,
K.
,
Barbas
,
A.
,
García
,
Á.
,
Morató
,
S.
,
Fernández
,
P.
, and
García
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Curso Básico de Fusión Nuclear; Concepción, Desarrollo y Madurez
,”
43rd Annual Meeting of the SNE
,
Malaga, Spain
,
Oct. 4–6
.
You do not currently have access to this content.