The paper presents the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) combustion modeling approach based on two combustion models. This modeling approach was applied to a hydrogen deflagration experiment conducted in a large-scale confined experimental vessel. The used combustion models were Zimont's turbulent flame-speed closure (TFC) model and Lipatnikov's flame-speed closure (FSC) model. The conducted simulations are aimed to aid identifying and evaluating the potential hydrogen risks in nuclear power plant (NPP) containment. The simulation results show good agreement with experiment for axial flame propagation using the Lipatnikov combustion model. However, substantial overprediction in radial flame propagation is observed using both combustion models, which consequently results also in overprediction of the pressure increase rate and overall combustion energy output. As assumed for a large-scale experiment without any turbulence inducing structures, the combustion took place in low-turbulence regimes, where the Lipatnikov combustion model, due to its inclusion of quasi-laminar source term, has advantage over the Zimont model.
Hydrogen–Air–Steam Deflagration Experiment Simulated Using Different Turbulent Flame-Speed Closure Models
Manuscript received September 30, 2016; final manuscript received December 21, 2017; published online May 16, 2018. Editor: Igor Pioro.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Cite Icon Cite
- Search Site
Tadej, H., Komen, E. M. J., and Ivo, K. (May 16, 2018). "Hydrogen–Air–Steam Deflagration Experiment Simulated Using Different Turbulent Flame-Speed Closure Models." ASME. ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. July 2018; 4(3): 031009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039067
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager