Solving the third-order simplified spherical harmonics method (SP3) equations is one of the key points in the development of advanced reactor calculation methods and has been widely concerned. The semi-analytical nodal method (SANM), based on transverse-integrated diffusion equation, has the advantages of high accuracy and convenience for multigroup calculation. Due to its advantages, the method is expected to be used in solving the SP3 equations. However, the traditional SANM is not rigorous since the expansion process does not take the special modality of the SP3 equations and their analytical solutions into consideration. There are two modalities of the SP3 equations, so there are two traditional SANM forms on solving the SP3 equations, and the differences between the two forms will be very important in further research on the SANM. A code is developed to solve the SP3 equations under the two different forms. After the calculation of the same benchmark, the difference between the two forms on solving the SP3 equations is found. According to the results, and in view of the special modality of the SP3 equations, points on a more rigorous SANM for solving the SP3 equations are discussed.
The Differences Between the Two Forms of Semi-Analytical Nodal Methods on Solving the Third-Order Simplified Spherical Harmonics Method Equations1
Manuscript received August 18, 2017; final manuscript received October 11, 2017; published online March 5, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Juan-Luis Francois.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Cite Icon Cite
- Search Site
Qingquan, P., Haoliang, L., Dongsheng, L., and Kan, W. (March 5, 2018). "The Differences Between the Two Forms of Semi-Analytical Nodal Methods on Solving the Third-Order Simplified Spherical Harmonics Method Equations." ASME. ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. April 2018; 4(2): 021008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038653
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager