An important requirement for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) design is the control system, which enables part power operability. The choices of control system methods must ensure variation of load without severe drawbacks on cycle performance. The objective of this study is to assess the control of the NPP under part power operations. The cycles of interest are the simple cycle recuperated (SCR) and the intercooled cycle recuperated (ICR). Control strategies are proposed for NPPs but the focus is on the strategies that result in part power operation using the inventory control method. First, results explaining the performance and load limiting factors of the inventory control method are documented; subsequently, the transient part power performances are also documented. The load versus efficiency curves were also derived from varying the load to understand the efficiency penalties. This is carried out using a modeling and performance simulation tool designed for this study. Results show that the ICR takes ∼102% longer than the SCR to reduce the load to 50% in design point (DP) performance conditions for similar valve flows, which correlates with the volumetric increase for the ICR inventory tank. The efficiency penalties are comparable for both cycles at 50% part power, whereby a 22% drop in cycle efficiency was observed and indicates limiting time at very low part power. The analyses intend to aid the development of cycles for Generation IV NPPs specifically gas cooled fast reactors (GFRs) and very high-temperature reactors (VHTRs), where helium is the coolant.

References

References
1.
Carre
,
F.
,
Yvon
,
P.
,
Anzieu
,
P.
,
Chauvin
,
N.
, and
Malo
,
J.-Y.
,
2010
, “
Update of the French R&D Strategy on Gas-Cooled Reactors
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
240
(
10
), pp.
2401
2408
.
2.
Locatelli
,
G.
,
Mancini
,
M.
, and
Todeschini
,
N.
,
2013
, “
Generation IV Nuclear Reactors: Current Status and Future Prospects
,”
Energy Policy
,
61
, pp.
1503
1520
.
3.
Gad-Briggs
,
A.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2017
, “
Analyses of Simple and Intercooled Recuperated Direct Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Reactor Power Plants
,”
ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci.
,
3
(
1
), p.
011017
.
4.
Gad-Briggs
,
A.
,
Pilidis
,
P.
, and
Nikolaidis
,
T.
,
2017
, “
A Review of the Turbine Cooling Fraction for Very High Turbine Entry Temperature Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Reactor Power Plants
,”
ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci.
,
3
(
2
), p.
021007
.
5.
Pradeepkumar
,
K. N.
,
Tourlidakis
,
A.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2001
, “
Analysis of 115MW, 3-Shaft, Helium Brayton Cycle Using Nuclear Heat Source
,”
ASME
Paper No. 2001-GT-0523.
6.
Pradeepkumar
,
K. N.
,
Tourlidakis
,
A.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2001
, “
Design and Performance Review of PBMR Closed Cycle Gas Turbine Plant in South Africa
,”
International Joint Power Generation Conference
, New Orleans, LA, June 4–7.
7.
Pradeepkumar
,
K. N.
,
Tourlidakis
,
A.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2001
, “
Performance Review: PBMR Closed Cycle Gas Turbine Power Plant
,”
Technical Committee Meeting on HTGR—Power Conversion Systems
, International Atomic Energy Agency (
IAEA
), Nov. 14–16, 2000, pp.
99
112
.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:32047835
8.
Sato
,
H.
,
Yan
,
X.
,
Ohashi
,
H.
,
Tachibana
,
Y.
, and
Kunitomi
,
K.
,
2012
, “
Control Strategies for VHTR Gas-Turbine System With Dry Cooling
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE20-POWER2012-54351.
9.
Gad-Briggs
,
A.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2017
, “
Analyses of Off-Design Point Performances of Simple and Intercooled Brayton Helium Recuperated Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants
,”
25th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
(ICONE), Shanghai, China, May 14–18, Paper No. ICONE25-67714.
10.
Gad-Briggs
,
A.
,
Nikolaidis
,
T.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2017
, “
Analyses of the Effect of Cycle Inlet Temperature on the Precooler and Plant Efficiency of the Simple and Intercooled Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants
,”
Appl. Sci.
,
7
(
4
), p.
319
.
11.
Gad-Briggs
,
A.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2017
, “
Analyses of the Off-Design Point Performance of a High Pressure Ratio Intercooled Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycle for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants
,”
25th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
(ICONE), Shanghai, China, May 14–18, Paper No. ICONE25-67715.
12.
Yan
,
X.
,
Kunitomi
,
K.
,
Nakata
,
T.
, and
Shiozawa
,
S.
,
2003
, “
GTHTR300 Design and Development
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
222
(
2–3
), pp.
247
262
.
13.
Bammert
,
K.
,
Krey
,
G.
, and
Krapp
,
R.
,
1974
, “
Operation and Control of the 50 MW Closed-Cycle Helium Turbine Oberhausen
,”
ASME
Paper No. 74-GT-13.
14.
Openshaw
,
F.
,
Estrine
,
E.
, and
Croft
,
M.
,
1976
, “
Control of a Gas Turbine HTGR
,”
ASME
Paper No. 76-GT-97.
15.
Covert
,
R. E.
,
Krase
,
J. M.
, and
Morse
,
D. C.
,
1974
, “
Effect of Various Control Modes on the Steady-State Full and Part Load Performance of a Direct-Cycle Nuclear Gas Turbine Power Plant
,”
ASME
Paper No. 74-WA/GT-7.
16.
Sato
,
H.
,
Yan
,
X.
,
Tachibana
,
Y.
, and
Kato
,
Y.
,
2012
, “
Assessment of Load-Following Capability of VHTR Cogeneration Systems
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
49
, pp.
33
40
.
17.
Bammert
,
K.
, and
Krey
,
G.
,
1971
, “
Dynamic Behaviour and Control of Single-Shaft Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
93
(
4
), pp.
447
453
.
18.
Kulhanek
,
M.
, and
Dostal
,
V.
,
2007
, “
Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycles. Thermodynamic Analysis and Comparison
,” Czech Technical University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
19.
Baxi
,
C. B.
,
Shenoy
,
A.
,
Kostin
,
V. I.
,
Kodochigov
,
N. G.
,
Vasyaev
,
A. V.
,
Belov
,
S. E.
, and
Golovko
,
V. F.
,
2008
, “
Evaluation of Alternate Power Conversion Unit Designs for the GT-MHR
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
238
(
11
), pp.
2995
3001
.
20.
Gad-Briggs
,
A.
,
Pilidis
,
P.
, and
Nikolaidis
,
T.
,
2017
, “
Analyses of a High Pressure Ratio Intercooled Direct Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycle for Generation IV Reactor Power Plants
,”
ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci.
,
3
(
1
), p. 011021.
21.
Pitts
,
D. R.
, and
Sissom
,
L. E.
,
1997
,
Theory and Problems of Heat Transfer
,
2nd ed.
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
22.
Navarro
,
H. A.
, and
Cabezas-Gomez
,
L. C.
,
2007
, “
Effectiveness-NTU Computation With a Mathematical Model for Cross-Flow Heat Exchangers
,”
Braz. J. Chem. Eng.
,
24
(
4
), pp.
509
521
.
23.
Sato
,
H.
,
Yan
,
X. L.
,
Tachibana
,
Y.
, and
Kunitomi
,
K.
,
2014
, “
GTHTR300—A Nuclear Power Plant Design With 50% Generating Efficiency
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
275
, pp.
190
196
.
24.
Kyprianidis
,
K. G.
,
2010
, “
Multi-Disciplinary Conceptual Design of Future Jet Engine Systems
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK.https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/8041
25.
Decher
,
R.
,
1994
,
Energy Conversion, Systems, Flow Physics and Engineering
,
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
.
26.
Frutschi
,
H. U.
,
2005
,
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines
,
ASME Press
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.