Standards, guidelines, manuals, and researches refer mainly to the required protection of a nuclear power plant (NPP) containment structure (where the reactor's vessel is located) against different internal and external extreme events. However, there is no consideration regarding the man-made extreme event of external explosion resulting from air bomb or cruise missile. A novel integrated blast resistance model (IBRM) of NPP's reinforced concrete (RC) auxiliary facilities due to an external above ground explosion based on two components is suggested. The first is structural dynamic response analysis to the positive phase of an external explosion based on the single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) method combined with spalling and breaching empirical correlations. The second is in-structure shock analysis, resulting from direct-induced ground shock and air-induced ground shock. As a case study, the resistance of Westinghouse commercial NPP AP1000 control room, including a representative equipment, to an external above ground blast loading of Scud B-100 missile at various standoff distances ranging from 250 m (far range) till contact, was analyzed. The structure's damage level is based on its front wall supports' angle of rotation and the ductility ratio (dynamic versus elastic midspan displacement ratio). Due to the lack of specific structural damage demands and equipment's dynamic capacities, common protective structures standards and manuals are used while requiring that no spalling or breaching shall occur in the control room while it remains in the elastic regime. The engineering systems and equipments' spectral motions should be less than their capacity. The integrated blast resistance model (IBRM) of the structure and its equipment may be used in wider researches concerning other NPP's auxiliary facilities and systems based upon their specifications.

References

References
1.
IAEA
,
2002
, “
External Human Induced Events in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants
,”
International Atomic Energy Agency Safety Standard Series
, Vienna, Austria, Safety Guide No. NS-G-3.1.
2.
IAEA
,
2003
, “
External Events Excluding Earthquakes in the Design of Nuclear Power Plants
,”
International Atomic Energy Agency, Safety Standard Series
, Vienna, Austria, Safety Guide No. NS-G-1.5.
3.
U.S. NRC
,
2007
, “
Design-Basis Tornado and Tornado Missiles for Nuclear Power Plants
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, Regulatory Guide 1.76, accessed Mar. 3, 2015, http://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0703/ML070360253.pdf
4.
Krauthammer
,
T.
,
2008
,
Modern Protective Structures
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
5.
U.S. DoD
,
2008
, “
Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions
,” Unified Facilities Criteria, United States of America, Department of Defense, Washington, DC, Document No.
UFC 3-340-02
.
6.
Vasilis
,
K. G. S.
,
2013
, “
Calculation of Blast Loads for Application to Structural Components
,” European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy, Paper No.
JRC 32253-2011
.
7.
Dusenberry
,
D. O.
,
2010
,
Handbook for Blast-Resistant Design of Buildings
,
Wiley
, Hoboken,
NJ
.
8.
Baker
,
W. E.
,
1983
,
Explosion Hazards and Evaluation
,
Elsevier Scientific B.V.
,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
.
9.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
,
2006
, “
User's Guide for the Single Degree of Freedom Blast Effects Design Spreadsheets (SBEDS)
,” Technical Report No. PDC-TR 06-02.
10.
Kinney
,
G. F.
, and
Graham
,
K. J.
,
1985
,
Explosive Shocks in Air
,
2nd ed.
,
Springer
,
New York
.
11.
Goel
,
M. D.
,
Matsagar
, V
. A.
,
Gupta
,
A. K.
, and
Marburg
,
S.
,
2012
, “
An Abridged Review of Blast Wave Parameters
,”
Def. Sci. J.
,
62
(
5
), pp.
300
306
.
12.
Swisdak
,
M. M.
, Jr
.,
1994
, “
Simplified Kingery Airblast Calculations
,”
Twenty-Sixth DoD Explosives Safety Seminar
, Miami, FL, Aug. 16–18.
13.
Mendis
,
P.
,
Ngo
,
T.
,
Gupta
,
A.
, and
Ramsay
,
J.
,
2007
, “
Blast Loading and Blast Effects on Structures–An Overview
,”
eJSE
,
7
, pp.
76
91
.
14.
Moon
,
N. N.
,
2009
, “
Prediction of Blast Loading and Its Impact on Buildings
,” M.Tech. thesis, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, India.
15.
Tai
,
Y.
,
Chu
,
T.
,
Hu
,
H.
, and
Wu
,
J.
,
2011
, “
Dynamic Response of a Reinforced Concrete Slab Subjected to Air Blast Load
,”
Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech.
,
56
(
3
), pp.
140
147
.
16.
Abladey
,
L.
, and
Braimah
,
A.
,
2014
, “
Near-Field Explosion Effects on the Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Columns: A Numerical Investigation
,”
Int. J. Prot. Struct.
,
5
(
4
), pp.
475
499
.
17.
Remennikov
,
A.
,
Mentus
,
I.
, and
Uy
,
B.
,
2015
, “
Explosive Breaching of Walls With Contact Charges: Theory and Applications
,”
Int. J. Prot. Struct.
,
6
(
4
), pp.
629
647
.
18.
Peplow
,
D. E.
,
Sulfredge
,
C. D.
,
Sanders
,
R. L.
,
Morris
,
R. H.
, and
Hann
,
T. A.
,
2004
, “
Calculating Nuclear Power Plant Vulnerability Using Integrated Geometry and Event/Fault-Tree Models
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
,
146
(
1
), pp.
71
87
.
19.
Cizelj
,
L.
,
Leskovar
,
M.
,
Čepin
,
M.
, and
Mavko
,
B.
,
2009
, “
A Method for Rapid Vulnerability Assessment of Structures Loaded by Outside Blasts
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
239
(
9
), pp.
1641
1646
.
20.
Berg
,
H. P.
, and
Hauschild
,
J.
,
2012
, “
Probabilistic Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Protection Against External Explosions
,” CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, accessed Nov. 5, 2016, http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/39785/InTech-Probabilistic_assessment_of_nuclear_power_plant_protection_against_external_ explosions.pdf
21.
Sundararajan
,
C. R.
,
1995
,
Probabilistic Structural Mechanics Handbook: Theory and Industrial Applications
,
Springer
,
New York
.
22.
CNSC
,
2012
, “
Guidance on Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants
,” Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Guidance Document, No.
GD-310
.
23.
Papazoglou
,
I.
,
Bari
,
R.
,
Buslik
,
A.
,
Hall
,
R.
,
Ilberg
,
D.
,
Samanta
,
P.
,
Teichmann
,
T.
,
Youngblood
,
R.
,
El-Bassioni
,
A.
, and
Fragola
,
J.
,
1984
, “
Probabilistic Safety Analysis Procedures Guide
,” Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, accessed Nov. 5, 2016, http://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0635/ML063550253.pdf
24.
Rajendran
,
R.
, and
Lee
,
J.
,
2009
, “
Blast Loaded Plates
,”
Mar. Struct.
,
22
(
2
), pp.
99
127
.
25.
ASCE
,
2010
,
Design of Blast Resistant Buildings in Petrochemical Facilities
,
2nd ed.
,
American Society of Civil Engineers
, Reston,
VA
.
26.
Ornai
,
D.
,
2012
,
Extreme Events 2-An Introduction to Protective Structures
(Lecture Notes),
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
,
Beer-Sheva, Israel
.
27.
Whitney
,
M. G.
, and
Spivey
,
K. H.
,
1993
, “
Quantity Distance Requirements for Earth-Bermed Aircraft Shelters
,” DTIC Technical Report No.
ADA279692
.
28.
PDC
,
2008
, “
Single Degree of Freedom Structural Response Limits for Antiterrorism Design
,” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Protective Design Center, Washington, DC, Document No.
PDC-TR 06-08
.
29.
U.S. NRC
,
2011
, “
AP1000 Design Control Document Appendix 3H: Auxiliary and Shield Building Critical Sections, Rev. 19
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, Accession No.
ML11171A500
.
30.
NEI
,
2002
, “
Deterring Terrorism: Aircraft Crash Impact Analyses Demonstrate Nuclear Power Plant's Structural Strength
,” Nuclear Energy Institute, Washington, DC, accessed, Mar. 3, 2015, https://www.nei.org/CorporateSite/media/MemberFiles/Backgrounders/Reports-Studies/EPRI_Nuclear_Plant_Structural_Study_2002.pdf?ext=.pdf
31.
U.S. DoA
,
1986
, “
Technical Manual: Fundamentals of Protective Design for Conventional Weapons
,” United States Department of the Army, Washington, DC, Manual No. TM 5-855-1.
32.
NEI
,
2011
, “
Methodology for Performing Aircraft Impact Assessments for New Plant Designs
,” Nuclear Energy Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, Document No.
NEI 07-13 Revision 8P
.
You do not currently have access to this content.