Two severe accident scenarios are investigated in this paper as they have never been considered previously in the safety analysis report (SAR) of the Congo TRIGA Mark II research reactor (TRICO II) in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo. The source term is derived from the reactor core after two postulated accidents: (1) a large plane crash with total destruction of the reactor building and (2) full damage of one fuel element while the reactor building remains intact. Total effective dose (TED), after core inventory, and dose profiles to human organs are derived to assess the operational safety of the reactor. Results from the study will be used to upgrade the current SAR of the reactor as the reactor safety and licensing concepts are changing over the years; the knowledge and lessons learned from the past experience are being updated accordingly with the available data. TEDs to workers of the facility show that higher values are obtained at areas near the source term at the time of the plane crash accident, which dies out as quickly as the plume is carried away following predominant meteorological conditions at the site. The situation with one fuel element totally damaged poses no threat as far as radiation protection is concerned and reveals a maximum TED of 1.30×107  mSv at 100 m from the reactor core. This shows that the operation of this type of research reactor is reliable and safe.

References

1.
Muswema
,
J. L.
,
Darko
,
E. O.
,
Gbadago
,
J.
, and
Boafo
,
E. K.
,
2014
, “
Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling and Radiological Safety Analysis for a Hypothetical Accident of Ghana Research Reactor-1 (GHARR-1)
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
68
,
239
246
. 0306-4549
2.
Raza
,
S. S.
, and
Iqbal
,
M.
,
2005
, “
Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling for an Accidental Release From the Pakistan Research Reactor-1 (PARR-1)
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
32
(
11
),
1157
1166
. 0306-4549
3.
Zhu
,
Y.
,
Guo
,
J.
,
Nie
,
C.
, and
Zhou
,
Y.
,
2014
, “
Simulation and Dose Analysis of a Hypothetical Accident in Sanmen Nuclear Power Plant
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
65
,
207
213
. 0306-4549
4.
Muswema
,
J. L.
,
Ekoko
,
B. G.
,
Lukanda
,
V. M.
,
Lobo
,
J. K.-K.
,
Darko
,
E. O.
, and
Boafo
,
E. K.
,
2015
, “
Source Term Derivation and Radiological Safety Analysis for the TRICO II Research Reactor in Kinshasa
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
281
,
51
57
. 0029-5493
5.
Tomsio
,
N.
,
1986
, “
Characterization of TRIGA Fuel
,”
GA Technologies
,
San Diego, CA
, .
6.
Pasquill
,
F.
,
1974
,
Atmospheric Diffusion
, 2nd ed.
Wiley
,
New York
.
7.
IAEA
,
2011
, “
Generic Procedures for Response to a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency at Triga Research Reactors
,”
EPR-TRIGA Research Reactor
,
Vienna, Austria
.
8.
IAEA
,
2014
, “
Safety Reassessment for Research Reactors in the Light of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant
,”
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
Vienna, Austria
, .
9.
Nucleonica GmbH
,
2014
, “
Nucleonica Nuclear Science Portal
,” Version 3.0.47,
Karlsruhe
, www.nucleonica.com.
10.
Fischer
,
U.
, and
Wiese
,
H. W.
,
1983
,
Verbesserte konsistente Berechnung des nuklearen Inventars abgebrannter DWR-Brennstoffe auf der Basis von Zell-Ab-brand-Verfahren mit KORIGEN
, KfK, Vol. 
3014
,
Forschungszentrum
,
Karlsruhe, Germany
.
11.
Duchemin
,
B.
, and
Nordborg
,
C.
,
1992
, “
Decay Heat Calculation. An International Nuclear Code Comparison
,”
Nuclear Data for Science and Technology
,
Qaim
,
S. M.
, ed.
Springer
,
France
.
12.
Homann
,
S. G.
,
2011
, “
HotSpot Health Physics Code
,” Version 2.07.2, User’s Guide, LLNL-SM-483991,
National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
,
Livermore, CA
, September.
13.
Konda
,
U.
,
Sigh
,
T.
,
Singla
,
P.
, and
Scott
,
P.
,
2010
, “
Uncertainty Propagation in a Puff-Based Dispersion Models Using Polynomial Chaos
,”
Environ. Modell. Software
,
25
(
12
),
1608
1618
.
14.
Rao
,
K. S.
,
2005
, “
Uncertainty Analysis in Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling
,”
Pure Appl. Geophys.
,
162
(
10
),
1893
1917
. 0033-4553
15.
US-NRC
,
2000
, “
Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Reactors
,” Regulatory Guide 1.183,
US-NRC
,
Washington, DC
.
16.
ICRP
,
1991
, “
Recommendation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection
,”
Ann. ICRP (ICRP Publication 60)
,
ICRP
,
Stockholm, Sweden
,
21
, pp. 
1
3
.
17.
ICRP
,
1994
, “
Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection
,”
Ann. ICRP (ICRP Publication 66)
,
ICRP
,
Stockholm, Sweden
,
24
, pp. 
1
3
.
18.
IAEA
,
1996
, “
International Basic Safety Standards for Protection Against Ionizing Radiation and for Safety of Radiation Sources
,”
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
Vienna, Austria
, .
19.
IAEA
,
2001
, “
Generic Models for Use in Assessing the Impact of Discharges of Radioactive Substances to the Environment
,”
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
Vienna, Austria
, .
20.
Woodruff
,
W. L.
,
Warinner
,
D. K.
, and
Matos
,
J. E.
,
1992
, “
Radiological Consequence Analysis
,”
Research Reactor Core Conversion Guidebook
, IAEA-TECDOC-643, Vol. 
2
,
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
Vienna, Austria
.
21.
Stacey
,
W. M.
,
2007
,
Nuclear Reactor Physics
, 2nd ed. (Completely Revised and Enlarged),
Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, KGaA
,
Weinheim, Germany
.
You do not currently have access to this content.