Abstract

This paper presents the results of neutron detection efficiency and dosimetry between a nonborated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (NB-CTMFD) configured to detect fast (>0.1 MeV) versus two widely used combined thermal and fast neutron detection devices of similar form factors: moderated He-3 based Ludlum-42-49BTM neutron detector, and, the Fuji NSN3TM pressurized nitrogen-methane filled neutron detector. The one-on-one performance comparisons were conducted using hard (Am-Be) and soft (Cf-252 fission) neutron spectra isotope neutron sources positioned behind various levels of lead and concrete shielding ranging in thickness from 0 cm (unshielded) to up to 30 cm. The comparisons were conducted together with Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code simulations to account for 3-D effects and to relate the detection sensitivity with the dose rate. The MCNP model results for the neutron energy spectrum were validated versus experimental measurements using the H*TMFD. While the Ludlum and NSN3 detectors operate at a fixed sensitivity setting, the NB-CTMFD detector could be operated at various sensitivity levels by varying the tensioned metastable negative pressure (Pneg) from 0.3 MPa to 0.7 MPa. The NB-CTMFD (configured for fast: >0.1 MeV neutron detection at Pneg = 0.7 MPa) offered relative sensitivity enhancements of up to 15x greater than the Ludlum and ∼5x greater than the NSN3 detector for low shielding thicknesses. For larger thicknesses, the advantage factor for NB-CTMFD unit reduces with increased fast neutron removal via down-scattering, which benefits the Ludlum and NSN3 detectors. Our companion paper compares performance with a Cf-252 spectrum using a borated CTMFD (covering dual energy bins: thermal-epithermal and fast energy ranges) wherein, it is demonstrated that the advantage factor for the CTMFD (if borated) remains elevated at the 5–10x higher level for low and large shielding thicknesses and soft and hard neutron spectra.

References

1.
Harabagiu
,
C.
,
Ozerov
,
S.
,
Minnette
,
J.
,
Boyle
,
N.
,
Mitchell
,
H.
,
Vanderkolk
,
E.
, and
Taleyarkhan
,
R. P.
,
2021
, “
Detection Sensitivity Comparison of Centrifugally Tensioned Metastable Fluid Detector versus Ludlum-42-49B™ for Shielded & Unshielded Neutron Source Configurations
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
385
, p.
111530
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111530
2.
Taleyarkhan
,
R. P.
,
Lapinskas
,
J.
, and
Xu
,
Y.
,
2008
, “
Tensioned Metastable Fluids and Nanoscale Interactions With External Stimuli—Theoretical-Cum-Experimental Assessments and Nuclear Engineering Applications
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
238
(
7
), pp.
1820
1827
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.10.019
3.
Taleyarkhan
,
R. P.
,
2020
, “
Monitoring Neutron Radiation in Extreme Gamma/X-Ray Radiation Fields
,”
Sensors
,
20
(
3
), p.
640
.10.3390/s20030640
4.
Archambault
,
B.
,
Hagen
,
A.
,
Masuda
,
K.
,
Yamakawa
,
N.
, and
Taleyarkhan
,
R. P.
,
2017
, “
Threshold Rejection Mode Active Interrogation of SNMs Using Continuous Beam DD Neutrons With Centrifugal and Acoustic Tensioned Metastable Fluid Detectors
,”
IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.
,
64
(
7
), pp.
1781
1788
.10.1109/TNS.2016.2628244
5.
Hagen
,
A.
,
2018
, “
Detection and Interdiction of Shielded and Unshielded Special Nuclear Material Using Tensioned Metastable Fluid Detectors
,”
Ph.D. dissertation
,
Purdue University
,
West Lafayette, IN
.https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI10792266/
6.
Taleyarkhan
,
R. P.
,
Archambault
,
B.
,
Sansone
,
A.
,
Grimes
,
T. F.
, and
Hagen
,
A.
,
2020
, “
Neutron Spectroscopy & H*10 Dosimetry With Tensioned Metastable Fluid Detectors
,”
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., A
,
959
(
163278
), p.
163278
.10.1016/j.nima.2019.163278
7.
Nunomiya
,
T.
,
Nakamura
,
T.
,
Yamamura
,
S.
, and
Amano
,
T.
,
2017
, “
Development of Lightweight Portable Neutron Survey Meter
,”
J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.
,
54
(
11
), pp.
1215
1222
.10.1080/00223131.2017.1359115
8.
Sansone
,
A.
,
2021
, “
Neutron Spectroscopy Development in Tensioned Metastable Fluid Detectors
,” Ph.D. dissertation,
Purdue University
,
West Lafayette, IN
.
9.
Ota
,
Y.
, and
Taleyarkhan
,
R. P.
,
2024
, “
Performance of Borated CTMFD Detector versus Ludlum 42-49B, Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Hard (Am-Be) and Soft (Cf-252 Fission) Neutron Energy Spectra for Sources Within Lead/Concrete Shielded Configurations – Part 2
,”
ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci.
epub.10.1115/1.4065853
10.
Dana
,
S. A.
, and
Morgan
,
D. L.
,
2010
, “
The Helium-3 Shortage: Supply, Demand, and Options for Congress
,” Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Report No. R41,419-7-5700.
11.
Brown
,
D. A.
,
Chadwick
,
M. B.
,
Capote
,
R.
,
Kahler
,
A. C.
,
Trkov
,
A.
,
Herman
,
M. W.
,
Sonzogni
,
A. A.
,
Danon
,
Y.
,
Carlson
,
A. D.
, et al.,
2018
, “
ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library With CIELO-Project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data
,”
Nucl. Data Sheets
,
148
, pp.
1
142
.10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001
12.
ICRP (International Committee on Radiological Protection)
,
1997
, “
Conversion Coefficients for Use in Radiological Protection Against External Radiation
,” Pergamon Press, Report No. 74.
13.
Ludlum Measurements, Inc.
,
2024
,
LUDLUM MODEL 42-49 & 42-49B Neutron Detector
,
Ludlum Measurements, Inc
.
You do not currently have access to this content.