Abstract

A Level 3 probabilistic safety assessment (L3 PSA) is required in United Kingdom (UK) generic design assessment (GDA) to demonstrate that a new nuclear power plant is suitable to be built in UK. L3 PSA is used to assess the individual and societal risk and compare the results against the offsite radiation protection targets (RPTs) for fault and accident conditions. Its results can be used for risk evaluation and environmental impact assessment and provide useful information for alternative design features, rulemaking, and regulatory procedures. It takes into account atmospheric dispersion, demography, dosimetry, pathways to man, and plant/site characteristics. The radioactive source terms and their frequencies often are passed on from Level 1/2 PSA analyses. The framework for demonstrating the acceptability of the new plant design at GDA is presented for the assessments against RPTs 7, 8, and 9. There is little relevant good practice and mature standard for L3 PSAs that have recently been implemented worldwide. In this study, a pilot L3 PSA is performed for UK Hua-long Pressurized Water Reactor (UK HPR1000) to reflect the UK context and relevant good practices. It introduces the methodology and the processes to be followed to perform conditional consequence calculations for the faults and accident scenarios. All radiation sources are considered and analyzed. The radiological risks to a potential UK site are analyzed and compared against RPTs. A widely used code - PC COSYMA, is selected as a primary tool for the accident consequence calculations. The strengths and limitations of the code are identified based on the project situation, and either qualitative arguments or supplementary analyses are subsequently proposed to overcome the limitations. The final L3 PSA results are derived to support the demonstration that the offsite radiological risks for UK HPR1000 have been achieved as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) and have met the UK regulatory expectation.

References

1.
USNRC
,
1975
, “
Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Nuclear Power Plants
,” Appendix VI, Calculation of Reactor Accident Consequences, WASH-1400.
2.
Ritchie
,
L. T.
,
Johnson
,
J. D.
, and
Blond
,
R. M.
,
1983
, “
Calculations of Reactor-Accident Consequences Version 2 CRAC2: Computer Code, User's Guide
,”
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. NUREG/CR-2326, SAND81-1994.
3.
Chanin
,
D. I.
,
Sprung
,
J. L.
,
Ritchie
,
L. T.
, and
Jow
,
H.-N.
,
1990
, “
MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System (MACCS), Volume I, User's Guide
,”
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM,Report No. NUREG/CR-4691, SAND86-1562.
4.
USNRC
,
1990
, “
Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants
,”
USNRC
, Washington, DC, Report No. NUREG-1150.
5.
Chanin
,
D. I.
,
Young
,
M. L.
,
Randall
,
J.
, and
Jamali
,
K.
,
1998
, “
Code Manual for MACCS2: Volume 1, User's Guide
,”
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. NUREG/CR-6613, SAND97-0594.
6.
McFadden
,
K.
,
Bixler
,
N. E.
,
Eubanks
,
L. L.
, and
Haaker
,
R. K.
,
2009
,
WinMACCS, a MACCS2 Interface for Calculating Health and Economic Consequences From Accidental Release of Radioactive Materials Into the Atmosphere: User's Guide and Reference Manual for WinMACCS Version 3
,
Sandia National Laboratories
,
Albuquerque, NM
.
7.
HPA
,
2011
, PC COSYMA2.03 Release Notes, v1.5.
8.
Kelly
,
G. N.
,
1990
,
COSYMA: A New Programme Package for Accident Consequence Assessment
,
EUR 13028, Commission of the European Communities
, Brussels, Belgium.
9.
UKHSA
,
2023
, “PACE Software - Level 3 Probabilistic Safety Analysis for Nuclear Facilities,” accessed Oct. 31, 2023, https://www.ukhsa-protectionservices.org.uk/pace
10.
ASME
,
2017
, “
Standard for Radiological Accident Offsite Consequences Analysis (Level 3 PRA) to Support Nuclear Installations Applications
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, ASME/ANS RA-S-1.3-2017.
11.
ONR,
2019
, “
New Nuclear Reactors: Generic Design Assessment Guidance to Requesting Parties for the UK HPR1000
,” ONR-GDA-GD-001 Revision 4.
12.
ONR
,
2020
, Safety Assessment Principles for Nuclear Facilities, 2014 Edition, Revision 1 CM9 Ref 2019/367414.
13.
ONR
,
2019
, “
Radiological Analysis for Fault Conditions
,” NS-TAST-GD-045, Rev.5.
14.
IAEA
,
2018
,
Prospective Radiological Environmental Impact Assessment for Facilities and Activities
(IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-10),
IAEA
,
Vienna, Austria
.
15.
NRPB
,
1994
, Guidance on Restrictions on Food and Water Following a Radiological Accident, Volume 5, No.1, Table 2 in page 8.
16.
European Union
,
2016
, “
Council Regulation (Euratom)
,” 2016/52.
17.
Nuclear Energy Agency
,
1994
, “Probabilistic Accident Consequence Assessment Codes”, Second international comparison. Technical report. A joint report by the European Commission and the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency,
Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
,
Luxembourg
, Report.
18.
IAEA
,
2017
, “
International Peer Review of the Environmental Impact Assessment Performed for the Licence Application of the Baltic-1 Nuclear Power Plant, Kaliningrad, Russian Federation
,” Final Report of the IAEA International Review Team, Vienna, Report No. IAEA/ENV/KGD.
19.
ICRP
,
2006
, “
Assessing Dose of the Representative Person for the Purpose of the Radiation Protection of the Public. ICRP Publication 101a
,”
Ann. ICRP
,
36
(
3
), pp.
5
62
.10.1016/j.icrp.2007.02.002
20.
ICRP
,
1995
, “
Age-Dependent Doses to Members of the Public From Intake of Radionuclides - Part 4 Inhalation Dose Coefficients. ICRP Publication 71
,”
Ann. ICRP
,
25
(
3–4
), pp.
1
405
.10.1016/S0146-6453(00)80008-1
21.
ICRP
,
2012
, “
Compendium of Dose Coefficients Based on ICRP Publication 60. ICRP Publication 119
,”
Ann. ICRP
,
41
(
Suppl
), pp.
1
130
.10.1016/j.icrp.2013.05.003
22.
ICRP
,
1995
, “
Age-Dependent Doses to the Members of the Public From Intake of Radionuclides – Part 5 Compilation of Ingestion and Inhalation Coefficients. ICRP Publication 72
,”
Ann. ICRP
,
26
(
1
), pp.
1
91
.10.1088/0031-9155/41/12/017
23.
Smith
,
K. R.
, and
Jones
,
A. L.
,
2003
, “
Generalised Habit Data for Radiological Assessments
,” Table A-3 to Table A-5, NRPB-41, National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, UK.
You do not currently have access to this content.