Abstract

Misalignment is among the most common causes of vibrations in rotary machinery. Modern machinery is complicated and installing a sensor might be tricky at times. As a result, noncontact type sensors are critical in such situations. The present study investigates the influence of combinations between speed, load, and fault severity upon system vibration by employing acoustic sensor. Although acoustic sensor is used in angular fault diagnosis, however, this is the first attempt to combine the noncontact type of sensor and response surface methodology (RSM) to study the influence of misalignment upon system vibration and the factors that induce system vibrations in a misaligned rotor system. To investigate the effect of these interactions on system performance, RSM with root-mean-square (RMS) as a response factor is used. Design of experiments is used to prepare experiments, while analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to analyze the results. Speed has a significant impact on RMS value in both parallel and angular types of misalignments and it severely affects the system's performance. According to the RSM findings, a change in load influences vibration amplitude. With increasing defect severity, the change in RMS value was not particularly significant. The outcome of RSM using acoustic sensor was found well aligned with the conclusion drawn using RSM study with vibrational sensor.

References

1.
Jalan
,
A. K.
, and
Mohanty
,
A. R.
,
2011
, “
Model Based Fault Diagnosis in Rotating Machinery
,”
Int. J. Perform. Eng.
,
7
(
6
), pp.
515
523
.
2.
Jalan
,
A. K.
, and
Mohanty
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Model Based Fault Diagnosis of a Rotor-Bearing System for Misalignment and Unbalance Under Steady-State Condition
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
327
(
3
), pp.
604
622
.
3.
Maten
,
S.
,
1970
, “
Program Machine Maintenance by Measuring Vibration Velocity
,”
Hydrocarbon Process.
,
49
(
9
), pp.
291
296
.
4.
Piotrowski
,
J.
,
2006
,
Shaft Alignment Handbook
,
CRC Press
,
New York
.
5.
Xu
,
M.
, and
Marangoni
,
R.
,
1994
, “
Vibration Analysis of a Motor-Flexible Coupling-Rotor System Subject to Misalignment and Unbalance, Part I: Theoretical Model and Analysis
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
176
(
5
), pp.
663
679
.
6.
Xu
,
M.
, and
Marangoni
,
R.
,
1994
, “
Vibration Analysis of a Motor-Flexible Coupling-Rotor System Subject to Misalignment and Unbalance, Part II: Experimental Validation
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
176
(
5
), pp.
681
691
.
7.
Jalan
,
A. K.
,
Patil
,
S.
, and
Gaurav
,
M.
,
2020
, “
A Review on Fault Diagnosis of Misaligned Rotor Systems
,”
Int. J. Perform. Eng.
,
16
(
4
), pp.
499
509
.
8.
Ferrando Chacon
,
J. L.
,
Artigao Andicoberry
,
E.
,
Kappatos
,
V.
,
Asfis
,
G.
,
Gan
,
T.-H.
, and
Balachandran
,
W.
,
2014
, “
Shaft Angular Misalignment Detection Using Acoustic Emission
,”
Appl. Acoust.
,
85
, pp.
12
22
.
9.
Umbrajkaar
,
A.
,
Krishnamoorthy
,
A.
, and
Dhumale
,
R.
,
2020
, “
Vibration Analysis of Shaft Misalignment Using Machine Learning Approach Under Variable Load Conditions
,”
Shock Vib.
,
2020
, pp.
1
12
.
10.
Montgomery
,
D. C.
,
2017
,
Design and Analysis of Experiments
,
John Wiley and Sons
:
Hoboken, NJ
.
11.
Shekhar
,
S.
, and
Ghosh
,
J.
,
2020
, “
A Metamodeling Based Seismic Life-Cycle Cost Assessment Framework for Highway Bridge Structures
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
195
(
5
), p.
106724
.
12.
Ceravolo
,
R.
,
Faraci
,
A.
, and
Miraglia
,
G.
,
2020
, “
Bayesian Calibration of Hysteretic Parameters With Consideration of the Model Discrepancy for Use in Seismic Structural Health Monitoring
,”
Appl. Sci.
,
10
(
17
), p.
5813
.
13.
Yan
,
W.-J.
,
Chronopoulos
,
D.
,
Papadimitriou
,
C.
,
Cantero-Chinchilla
,
S.
, and
Zhu
,
G.-S.
,
2020
, “
Bayesian Inference for Damage Identification Based on Analytical Probabilistic Model of Scattering Coefficient Estimators and Ultrafast Wave Scattering Simulation Scheme
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
468
, p.
115083
.
14.
Carley
,
K. M.
,
Kamneva
,
N. Y.
, and
Reminga
,
J.
,
2006
, “Response Surface Methodology 1 Casos Technical Report”.
15.
Kankar
,
P.
,
Harsha
,
S.
,
Kumar
,
P.
, and
Sharma
,
S. C.
,
2009
, “
Fault Diagnosis of a Rotor Bearing System Using Response Surface Method
,”
Eur. J. Mech.—A Solids
,
28
(
4
), pp.
841
857
.
16.
Patil
,
M. S.
,
Mathew
,
J.
,
Rajendrakumar
,
P. K.
, and
Karade
,
S.
,
2010
, “
Experimental Studies Using Response Surface Methodology for Condition Monitoring of Ball Bearings
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
132
(
4
), p.
044505
.
17.
Singh
,
P.
, and
Harsha
,
S. P.
,
2020
, “
Vibration Response-Based Fault Diagnosis of Cylindrical Roller Bearing Using Response Surface Methodology
,”
ASME J. Nondestruct. Eval. Diagnos. Prognos. Eng. Syst.
,
3
(
2
), p.
021002
.
18.
Patil
,
S.
,
Jalan
,
A. K.
, and
Marathe
,
A. M.
,
2021
, “
Experimental Investigation Using Response Surface Methodology for Condition Monitoring of Misaligned Rotor System
,”
ASME J. Nondestruct. Eval. Diagnos. Prognos. Eng. Syst.
,
5
(
2
), p.
021003
.
19.
Patil Shital
,
K. J. A.
, and
Marathe
,
A.
,
2022
, “
Support Vector Machine for Misalignment Fault Classification Under Different Loading Conditions Using Vibro-Acoustic Sensor Data Fusion
,”
Exp. Techn
.
20.
Shital
,
P.
, and
Arun
,
K. J.
,
2022
, “
Ensemble Subspace Discriminant Classifiers for Misalignment Fault Classification Using Vibro-Acoustic Sensor Data Fusion
,”
J. Vib. Eng. Technol.
21.
Design Expert
,
2005
, Design Expert, “Version 7.0.0. Stat-Ease”.
22.
Hattab
,
M.
,
2018
, “
On the Use of Data Transformation in Response Surface Methodology: A Note on Data Transformation in Response Surface Methodology
,”
Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int.
,
34
(
6
), pp.
1185
1194
.
You do not currently have access to this content.