This article presents a study of various categories of risks associated with the size of power grid and probable solutions to mitigate the risks timely. The researchers believe that engineers must stop looking at the electrical grid solely as an aggregation of components. Instead, they must also view the grid as an entity whose very size and complexity make it behave differently from other types of systems. A systems perspective can help us explain why large blackouts are inevitable and why they occur more frequently than we might expect. It also enables us to consider new ways to reduce risk by restructuring the grid . An analysis shows that a grid with 500 to 700 nodes might be the sweet spot for a grid. It is large enough to let us suppress many small and medium-size outages, yet small enough to avoid the increased probability of massive blackouts. Dividing the grid into independent modules would produce more small and medium-size blackouts. While these events are quickly remedied, they would occur frequently enough to notice and draw complaints from utility customers. It would also make the grid less efficient for operators.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2015
Select Article
Right-Sizing the Grid
The Electric Grid is Prone to Massive Outages. Would Downsizing Improve its Performance?
David Newman is a professor of physics and director of the Center for Complex Systems Studies at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Mechanical Engineering. Jan 2015, 137(01): 34-39 (6 pages)
Published Online: January 1, 2015
Citation
Newman, D. (January 1, 2015). "Right-Sizing the Grid." ASME. Mechanical Engineering. January 2015; 137(01): 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2015-Jan-2
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Fortifying the Pipeline
Mechanical Engineering (July 2024)
Gold Medal Engineering
Mechanical Engineering (July 2024)
Generation on the Rise
Mechanical Engineering (July 2024)
What is Mechanical Engineering?
Mechanical Engineering (July 2024)
Related Articles
Data-Informed Risk Analysis of Power Grids: Application of Method for Managing Heterogeneous Datasets
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (June,2025)
Reliability and Risk Controlled by the Simultaneous Presence of Random Events on a Time Interval
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (June,2018)
A Set of Estimation and Decision Preference Experiments for Exploring Risk Assessment Biases in Engineering Students
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (March,2023)
Venturing to the Far Reaches
Mechanical Engineering (September,2005)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
PSA Level 2 — NPP Ringhals 2 (PSAM-0156)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Impact of CCF Assumptions on PSA and PSA Application Calculations (PSAM-0172)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
A PSA Update to Reflect Procedural Changes (PSAM-0217)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)