This article presents and compares two different control systems for a powered knee and ankle prosthesis for transfemoral amputees, which were constructed to provide the user a safe, intuitive, and well-coordinated interaction with the prosthesis. The piecewise-passive impedance (PPI) controller utilizes only impedance-like behaviors, while the second – a hybrid impedance-admittance (HIA) controller – utilizes both impedance-like and admittance-like behaviors in a hybrid approach. The HIA approach maintains many of the desirable characteristics of the PPI controller while also reducing the number of selectable control parameters. The HIA approach essentially incorporates the PPI control structure during the early and middle stance phases of gait, and a trajectory tracking control approach in terminal stance and swing. These controllers were implemented on a powered knee and ankle prosthesis and tested in walking trials by a transfemoral amputee. Data from these trials indicate that both controllers achieve comparable performance with respect to healthy subject data, despite some substantial structural differences between the two.

1.
B. J.
McFadyen
, and
D. A.
Winter
,
“An integrated biomechanical analysis of normal stair ascent and descent,”
J Biomech
, vol.
21
, no.
9
, pp.
733
744
1988
.
2.
D. A.
Winter
,
The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly and pathological
,
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
:
University of Waterloo Press
,
1991
.
3.
R.
Riener
,
M.
Rabuffetti
, and
C.
Frigo
,
“Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations,”
Gait Posture
, vol.
15
, no.
1
, pp.
32
44
, Feb.
2002
.
4.
A.
Forner Cordero
,
H. F.
Koopman
, and
F. C.
van der Helm
,
“Multiple-step strategies to recover from stumbling perturbations,”
Gait Posture
, vol.
18
, no.
1
, pp.
47
59
, Aug.
2003
.
5.
A. S.
McIntosh
,
K. T.
Beatty
,
L. N.
Dwan
, and
D. R.
Vickers
,
“Gait dynamics on an inclined walkway,”
J Biomech
, vol.
39
, no.
13
, pp.
2491
2502
2006
.
6.
S.
Au
,
M.
Berniker
, and
H.
Herr
,
“Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits,”
Neural Netw
, vol.
21
, pp.
654
666
,
2008
.
7.
S. K.
Au
,
J.
Weber
, and
H.
Herr
,
“Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Improves Walking Metabolic Economy,”
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
, , vol.
25
, no.
1
, pp.
51
66
,
2009
.
8.
E. C.
Martinez-Villalpando
, and
H.
Herr
,
“Agonist-antagonist active knee prosthesis: a preliminary study in level-ground walking,”
J Rehabil Res Dev
, vol.
46
, no.
3
, pp.
361
373
2009
.
9.
J. K.
Hitt
,
T. G.
Sugar
,
M.
Holgate
, and
R.
Bellman
,
“An Active Foot-Ankle Prosthesis With Biomechanical Energy Regeneration,”
Journal of Medical Devices
, vol.
4
, no.
1
, Mar.
2010
.
10.
M. A.
Holgate
,
A.
Bohler
, and
T. G.
Sugar
,
“Control algorithms for ankle robots: A reflection on the state-of-the-art and presentation of two novel algorithms,”
Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics
, pp.
97
102
,
2008
.
11.
C. D.
Hoover
,
G. D.
Fulk
, and
K. B.
Fite
,
“Stair Ascent With a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis Under Direct Myoelectric Control,”
IEEE/ASME Trans on Mechatronics
, vol.
18
, no.
3
,
2013
.
12.
M. F.
Eilenberg
,
H.
Geyer
, and
H.
Herr
,
“Control of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis based on a neuromuscular model,”
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng
, vol.
18
, no.
2
, pp.
164
173
Apr.
2010
.
You do not currently have access to this content.