Reprocessing has emerged as an attempt to control the cost of single-use bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices despite limited data on defect rates. This study compares the defect rates, as reported by surgical teams, between original equipment manufacturer (OEM) single-use bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices and reprocessed (RP) devices. Data were retrospectively collected on 3112 devices over a 7-month period for two types of bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices. There is a significant difference (p < 0.001) in reported bipolar and ultrasound diathermy device defects between OEM and RP. OEM single-use bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices were reported to be defective more frequently than RP devices based on reports from the surgical team.

Issue Section:
Technical Brief
Keywords:
Endoscopic devices , Medical devices, Equipment, Laparoscopic devices
Topics:
Surgery, Ultrasound, Teams, Medical devices

References

References
1.
Committee on Gynecologic Practice, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
,
2012
, “
Committee Opinion No. 537: Reprocessed Single-Use Devices
,”
Obstet. Gynecol.
,
120
(
4
), pp.
974
–
976
.
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
2.
U.S. GAO, 2008
, “
Reprocessed Single-Use Medical Devices: FDA Oversight Has Increased, and Available Information Does Not Indicate That Use Presents an Elevated Health Risk
,” U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC, accessed May 1, 2014, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08147.pdf
3.
Blackmore
,
C. C.
,
Bishop
,
R.
,
Luker
,
S.
, and
Williams
,
B. L.
,
2013
, “
Applying Lean Methods to Improve Quality and Safety in Surgical Sterile Instrument Processing
,”
Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf.
,
39
(
3
), pp.
99
–
105
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
4.
Larose
,
E.
,
2013
, “
Legal Implications of Single-Use Medical Device Reprocessing
,”
Healthcare Q.
,
16
(
3
), pp.
48
–
52
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
Pyrek
,
K. M.
,
2003
, “
Reprocessing of Medical Devices: Government Intensifies Its Scrutiny as Clinicians Debate Patient-Safety Issues. SurgiStrategies
,” Last accessed May 16, 2014, http://www.surgistrategies.com/articles/2003/02/reprocessing-of-medical-devices-116124.aspx
6.
Weld
,
K. J.
,
Dryer
,
S.
,
Hruby
,
G.
,
Ames
,
C. J.
,
Venkatesh
,
R.
,
Matthews
,
B. D.
, and
Landman
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Comparison of Mechanical and In Vivo Performance of New and Reprocessed Harmonic Scalpels
,”
Urology
,
67
(
5
), pp.
898
–
903
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
7.
FDA, Quality System Regulation
,
2014
, “
Title 21 Part 820 of the Code of Federal Regulations
,” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, accessed May 15, 2014, http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm
8.
Veselov
,
V.
,
Roytman
,
H.
, and
Alquier
,
L.
,
2012
, “
Medical Device Regulations for Process Validation: Review of FDA, GHTF, and GAMP Requirements
,”
J. Validation Technol.
,
18
(
2
), pp.
82
–
91
.
9.
Federal Register, Unique Device Identification System
,
2013
, “
A Rule by the Food and Drug Administration on 09/24/2013
,”
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
,
Washington, DC
, accessed May 15, 2014, https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/09/24/2013-23059/unique-device-identification-system
10.
Lee
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Repositioning Reprocessing: Hospitals See Big Potential for Savings, But Safety Remains an Issue for Some
,” Modern Healthcare, accessed June 4, 2014, http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20130706/MAGAZINE/307069957
You do not currently have access to this content.