Nasal septal deviation occurs in approximately 20% of the population (Blaugrand, S., 1989, “The Nasal Septum and Concha Bullosa,” Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am., 22, pp. 291–306). Depending on the severity of the deviation, the natural flow of air through the nasal passages can be obstructed, possibly leading to more advanced complications such as epistaxis, rhinorrhoea, postnasal drip, recurrent sinus pain, chronic nasal obstruction, obstructive sleep apnea, and increased risk of viral or bacterial infections. Numerous measurement techniques exist to assess nasal patency and identify any nasal occlusion including deviated septums such as Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans. However, there is no cost effective, user friendly method that attempts to measure the thickness of the septum. The design, fabrication, and operation of an easy-to-use and inexpensive device, which can be used quickly to measure nasal septal thickness post surgery and in follow up appointments is described. The device enables physicians to efficiently build a database of measures that can yield a new understanding of surgery effects. Measurements obtained using the new device are presented for five patients undergoing septoplasty surgery. It proved to be a fast and economical way to determine septal thickness. Initial results taken in pre, intra, and post surgery yielded results confirming the efficacy of the device as an efficient evaluation tool capable of giving instantaneous results of nasal septum geometry. The device achieves its intended function while keeping the product cost low. Early results also showed the efficacy in obtaining data on septoplasty surgery efficacy and septal swelling as a result of external factors such as histamines.

References

References
1.
Blaugrand
,
S.
,
1989
, “
The Nasal Septum and Concha Bullosa
,”
Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am.
,
22
, pp.
291
306
.
2.
Jessen
,
M.
, and
Malm
,
L.
,
1997
, “
Definition, Prevalence and Development of Nasal Obstruction
,”
Allergy
,
52
, pp.
3
6
.10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb04876.x
3.
Sipila
,
J.
, and
Suonpaa
,
J.
,
1997
, “
Long-Term Stability of Rhinomanometer Calibration
,”
J. Otolaryngol.
,
26
, pp.
49
52
.
4.
Araunachalam
,
P. R.
,
Kitcher
,
E.
,
Gray
,
J.
, and
Wilson
,
J. A.
,
2001
, “
Nasal Septal Surgery: Evaluation of Symptomatic and General Health Outcomes
,”
Clin. Otoloaryngol. Allied Sci.
,
26
, pp.
367
370
.10.1046/j.0307-7772.2001.00481.x
5.
Reber
,
M.
,
Rahm
,
F.
, and
Monneir
,
P.
,
1998
, “
The Role of Acoustic Rhinometry in the Pre- and Postoperative Evaluation of Surgery for Nasal Obstruction
,”
Rhinology
,
36
, pp.
184
187
.
6.
Smith-Bindman
,
R.
,
2010
, “
Is Computed Tomography Safe?
,”
N. Engl. J. Med.
,
363
, pp.
1
4
.10.1056/NEJMp1002530
7.
Berrington de González
,
A.
,
Mahesh
,
M.
,
Kim
,
K.
,
Bhargavan
,
M.
,
Lewis
,
R.
,
Mettler
,
F.
, and
Land
,
C.
,
2009
, “
Projected Cancer Risks From Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007
,”
Arch. Intern. Med.
,
169
(
22
), pp.
2071
2077
.10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440
8.
Shumacher
,
M. J.
,
2002
, “
Nasal Congestion and Airway Obstruction: The Validity of Available Objective and Subjective Measures
,”
Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep.
,
2
, pp.
245
251
.10.1007/s11882-002-0026-x
9.
Cuddihy
,
P. J.
, and
Eccles
,
R.
,
2003
, “
The Use of Nasal Spirometry as an Objective Measure of Nasal Septal Deviation and the Effectiveness of Septal Surgery
,”
Clin. Otolaryngol.
,
28
, pp.
325
330
.10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00714.x
10.
Hilberg
,
O.
,
2002
, “
Objective Measurement of Nasal Airway Dimensions Using Acoustic Rhinometry: Methodological and Clinical Aspects
,”
Allergy
,
57
, pp.
5
39
.10.1046/j.0908-665x.2001.all.doc.x
11.
Shelton
,
D. M.
, and
Eiser
,
N. M.
,
1992
, “
Evaluation of Active Anterior and Posterior Rhinomanometry in Normal Subjects
,”
Clin. Otoryngol.
,
17
, pp.
178
182
.10.1111/j.1365-2273.1992.tb01068.x
12.
Carney
,
A. S.
,
Bateman
,
N. D.
, and
Jones
,
N. S.
,
2000
, “
Reliable and Reproducible Anterior Active Rhinomanometry for the Assessment of Unilateral Nasal Resistance
,”
Clin. Otolaryngol.
,
25
, pp.
499
503
.10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00384.x
13.
Yaniv
,
E.
,
Hadar
,
T.
,
Shvero
,
J.
, and
Raveh
,
E.
,
1997
, “
Objective and Subjective Nasal Airflow
,”
Am. J. Otolaryngol.
,
18
, pp.
29
32
.10.1016/S0196-0709(97)90045-4
14.
Roithmann
,
R.
,
Cole
,
P.
,
Chapnik
,
J.
,
Shpirer
,
I.
,
Hoffstein
,
V.
, and
Zamel
,
N.
,
1995
, “
Acoustic Rhinometry in the Evaluation of Nasal Obstruction
,”
Laryngoscope
,
105
, pp.
275
281
.10.1288/00005537-199503000-00010
15.
Gilain
,
L.
,
Coste
,
A.
,
Ricolfi
,
F.
,
Daha
,
E.
,
Marliac
,
D.
,
Peynegre
,
R.
,
Harf
,
A.
, and
Louis
,
B.
,
1997
, “
Nasal Cavity Geometry Measured by Acoustic Rhinometry and Computed Tomography
,”
Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
,
123
, pp.
401
405
.10.1001/archotol.1997.01900040037006
You do not currently have access to this content.