Laparoscopic surgery is performed with long and slender instruments through one or several incisions in the abdominal wall. Steerable instruments with flexible distal tips have been developed for improving the ease of access to anatomic structures. However, the development of an intuitive and efficient control method for such steerable instruments remains a challenge. To determine which interface are most intuitive and effective to control steerable instruments, the current study evaluates the performance of novices in orienting the tip of a steerable laparoscopic forceps using thumb control or wrist control. Using two steerable instruments, one controlled by the thumb and the other by the wrist, 24 novices were divided into two groups that had to carry out an experimental task in an EndoTrainer with one of the two instruments. The participants had to orient the tip of the instrument relative to five targets that were presented in a random order. After a break, the participants switched to a second measurement session with the other instrument, followed by a third measurement session with the first instrument. Each participant performed the task 240 times over the three measurement sessions. The performance was assessed by measuring the performance time, using a questionnaire and grading the work load. The performance time showed a significant learning curve for each control method. The shortest performance time was recorded during the third session with both control methods (42.7 s for thumb control and 44.6 s for wrist control). A significant difference in the performance time was observed in the second session (p <0.02) but not in the first and third session. The questionnaire showed that most participants had a preference for thumb control. After a brief training period, thumb control and wrist control did not reveal significant differences in task performance. However, thumb control was strongly preferred by the participants due to the perceptive feeling in performance.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: c.fan@tudelft.nl
e-mail: h.c.clogenson@tudelft.nl
e-mail: p.breedveld@tudelft.nl
e-mail: j.j.vandendobbelsteen@tudelft.nl
e-mail: j.dankelman@tudelft.nl
Article navigation
June 2012
Research Papers
Comparison of Two Control Methods for Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments
Chunman Fan,
Chunman Fan
Faculty Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering,Department Biomechanical Engineering,
e-mail: c.fan@tudelft.nl
Delft University of Technology
, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Hélène Clogenson,
Hélène Clogenson
Faculty Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering,Department Biomechanical Engineering,
e-mail: h.c.clogenson@tudelft.nl
Delft University of Technology
, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul Breedveld,
Paul Breedveld
Faculty Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering,Department Biomechanical Engineering,
e-mail: p.breedveld@tudelft.nl
Delft University of Technology
, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
John J. van den Dobbelsteen,
John J. van den Dobbelsteen
Faculty Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering,Department Biomechanical Engineering,
e-mail: j.j.vandendobbelsteen@tudelft.nl
Delft University of Technology
, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Jenny Dankelman
Jenny Dankelman
Faculty Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering,Department Biomechanical Engineering,
e-mail: j.dankelman@tudelft.nl
Delft University of Technology
, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Chunman Fan
Faculty Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering,Department Biomechanical Engineering,
Delft University of Technology
, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
e-mail: c.fan@tudelft.nl
Hélène Clogenson
Faculty Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering,Department Biomechanical Engineering,
Delft University of Technology
, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
e-mail: h.c.clogenson@tudelft.nl
Paul Breedveld
Faculty Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering,Department Biomechanical Engineering,
Delft University of Technology
, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
e-mail: p.breedveld@tudelft.nl
John J. van den Dobbelsteen
Faculty Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering,Department Biomechanical Engineering,
Delft University of Technology
, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
e-mail: j.j.vandendobbelsteen@tudelft.nl
Jenny Dankelman
Faculty Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering,Department Biomechanical Engineering,
Delft University of Technology
, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
e-mail: j.dankelman@tudelft.nl
J. Med. Devices. Jun 2012, 6(2): 021005 (6 pages)
Published Online: April 26, 2012
Article history
Received:
October 18, 2011
Revised:
March 3, 2012
Online:
April 26, 2012
Published:
April 26, 2012
Citation
Fan, C., Clogenson, H., Breedveld, P., van den Dobbelsteen, J. J., and Dankelman, J. (April 26, 2012). "Comparison of Two Control Methods for Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments." ASME. J. Med. Devices. June 2012; 6(2): 021005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006544
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Harmonic Focus Case Study: Leading Innovation Through Unique User Research Methods and Tools
J. Med. Devices (June,2009)
Design of a Surgical Port for Minimally Invasive Beating-Heart Intracardial Procedures
J. Med. Devices (December,2011)
Application of Type Synthesis Theory to the Redesign of a Complex Surgical Instrument
J Biomech Eng (June,2002)
Design Innovation Size and Shape Optimization of a 1.0 mm Multifunctional Forceps-Scissors Surgical Instrument
J. Med. Devices (March,2008)
Related Chapters
Measurement and Control Method for Cutting Resistance of Protective Gloves
Performance of Protective Clothing: Fourth Volume
mDFA Human Empirical Results
Modified Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (mDFA)
Measured and Calculated Pavement Response in the Danish Road Testing Machine
Vehicle-Road Interaction