Computer modeling of blood flow in patient-specific anatomies can be a powerful tool for evaluating the design of implantable medical devices. We assessed three different endograft designs, which are implantable devices commonly used to treat patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Once implanted, the endograft may shift within the patient’s aorta allowing blood to flow into the aneurismal sac. One potential cause for this movement is the pulsatile force experienced by the endograft over the cardiac cycle. We used contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) data from four patients with diagnosed AAAs to build patient-specific models using 3D segmentation. For each of the four patients, we constructed a baseline model from the patient’s preoperative CTA data. In addition, geometries characterizing three distinct endograft designs were created, differing by where each device bifurcated into two limbs (proximal bifurcation, mid bifurcation, and distal bifurcation). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to simulate blood flow, utilizing patient-specific boundary conditions. Pressures, flows, and displacement forces on the endograft surface were calculated. The curvature and surface area of each device was quantified for all patients. The magnitude of the total displacement force on each device ranged from 2.43 N to 8.68 N for the four patients examined. Within each of the four patient anatomies, the total displacement force was similar (varying at least by 0.12 N and at most by 1.43 N), although there were some differences in the direction of component forces. Proximal bifurcation and distal bifurcation geometries consistently generated the smallest and largest displacement forces, respectively, with forces observed in the mid bifurcation design falling in between the two devices. The smallest curvature corresponded to the smallest total displacement force, and higher curvature values generally corresponded to higher magnitudes of displacement force. The same trend was seen for the surface area of each device, with lower surface areas resulting in lower displacement forces and vise versa. The patient with the highest blood pressure displayed the highest magnitudes of displacement force. The data indicate that curvature, device surface area, and patient blood pressure impact the magnitude of displacement force acting on the device. Endograft design may influence the displacement force experienced by an implanted endograft, with the proximal bifurcation design showing a small advantage for minimizing the displacement force on endografts.

References

References
1.
Zarins
,
C. K.
, and
Taylor
,
C.A.
, 2009, “
Endovascular Device Design in the Future: Transformation from Trial and Error to Computational Design
,”
J. Endovasc. Ther.
,
16
(
Suppl I
), pp.
I12
I21
.
2.
Jordan
,
W. D.
,
Alcocer
,
F.
,
Wirthlin
D. J.
,
Westfall
,
A. O.
, and
Whitley
,
D.
, 2009, “
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in High-Risk Surgical Patients: Comparison of Open and Endovascular Repair
,”
Ann. Surg.
,
237
(
5
), pp.
623
6301
.
3.
Gillum
,
R. F.
, 1995, “
Epidemiology of Aortic Aneurysm in the United States
,”
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
,
48
(
11
), pp.
1289
1298
.
4.
Vallabhaneni
,
S. R.
, and
Harris
,
P. L.
, 2001, “
Lessons Learnt from the EUROSTAR Registry on Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
,”
Eur. J. Radiol.
,
39
(
1
), pp.
34
41
.
5.
Greenhalgh
,
R. M.
, 2004, “
Comparison of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair With Open Repair in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (EVAR Trial 1), 30-Day Operative Mortality Results: Randomised Controlled Trial
,”
Lancet
,
364
(
9437
), pp.
843
848
.
6.
Harris
,
P. L.
,
Vallabhaneni
,
S. R.
,
Desgranges
,
P.
,
Becquemin
,
J. P.
,
van Marrewijk
,
C.
, and
Laheij
,
R. J.
, 2000, “
Incidence and Risk Factors of Late Rupture, Conversion, and Death after Endovascular Repair of Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysms: The EUROSTAR Experience
,”
J. Vasc. Surg.
,
32
(
4
), pp.
739
749
.
7.
Schurink
,
G. W. H.
,
Aarts
,
N. J. M.
, and
van Bockel
,
J. H.
, 1999, “
Endoleak After Stent-Graft Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies
,”
Br. J. Surg.
,
86
(
5
), pp.
581
587
.
8.
Figueroa
,
C. A.
,
Taylor
,
C. A.
,
Yeh
,
V.
,
Chiou
,
A. J.
, and
Zarins
,
C. K.
, 2009, “
Effect of Curvature on Displacement Forces Acting on Aortic Endografts: A 3-Dimensional Computational Analysis
,”
J. Endovasc. Ther.
,
16
(
3
), pp.
284
294
.
9.
Yushkevich
,
P. A.
,
Piven
,
J.
,
Hazlett
,
H. C.
,
Smith
,
R. G.
,
Ho
,
S.
,
Gee
,
J. C.
, and
Gerig
,
G.
, 2006, “
User-Guided 3D Active Contour Segmentation of Anatomical Structures: Significantly Improved Efficiency and Reliability
,”
Neuroimage
,
31
(
3
), pp.
1116
28
.
10.
Wang
,
K. C.
,
Dutton
,
R. W.
, and
Taylor
,
C. A.
, 1999, “
Improving Geometric Model Construction for Blood Flow Modeling
,”
IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag.
,
18
(
6
), pp.
33
39
.
11.
Wilson
,
N.
,
Wang
,
K.
,
Dutton
,
R. W.
, and
Taylor
,
C. A.
, 2001, “
A Software Framework for Creating Patient Specific Geometric Models from Medical Imaging Data for Simulation Based Medical Planning of Vascular Surgery
,”
Lect. Notes Comput. Sci.
,
2208
, pp.
449
456
.
12.
Xiong
,
G.
,
Figueroa
,
C. A.
,
Xiao
,
N.
, and
Taylor
,
C. A.
, 2010, “
Simulation of Blood Flow in Deformable Vessels Using Subject-Specific Geometry and Assigned Variable Mechanical Wall Properties
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng.
,
27
(
7
), pp.
1000
1016
.
13.
Xiong
,
G.
,
Choi
,
G.
, and
Taylor
,
C.
, 2010, “
Virtual Interventions for Image-Based Blood Flow Computation
,”
CAD
, in press.
14.
Les
,
A. S.
,
Shadden
,
S. C.
,
Figueroa
,
C. A.
,
Park
,
J. M.
,
Tedesco
,
M. M.
,
Herfkens
,
R. J.
,
Dalman
,
R. L.
, and
Taylor
,
C. A.
, 2010, “
Quantification of Hemodynamics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms During Rest and Exercise Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics
,”
Ann. Biomed. Eng.
,
38
(
4
), pp.
1288
1313
.
15.
Kim
,
H. J.
,
Figueroa
,
C. A.
,
Hughes
,
T. J. R.
,
Jansen
,
K. E.
, and
Taylor
,
C. A.
, 2009, “
Augmented Lagrangian Method for Constraining the Shape of Velocity Profiles at Outlet Boundaries for Three-Dimensional Finite Element Simulations of Blood Flow
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
198
(
45–46
), pp.
3551
3566
.
16.
Howell
,
B. A.
,
Kim
,
T.
,
Cheer
,
A.
,
Dwyer
,
H.
,
Saloner
,
D.
, and
Chuter
,
T. A. M.
, 2007, “
Computational Fluid Dynamics Within Bifurcated Abdominal Aortic Stent-Grafts
,”
J. Endovasc. Ther.
,
14
(
2
), pp.
138
143
.
17.
O’Kelly
,
T. J.
, and
Heather
,
B. P.
, 1989, “
General Practice-Based Population Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Pilot Study
,”
Br. J. Surg.
,
76
(
5
), pp.
479
480
.
18.
McGloughlin
,
T. M.
,
Morris
,
L. G.
, and
Callanan
,
J. A.
, 2007, “
Geometrical Enhancements for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Grafts and Stent-Grafts
,”
J. Endovasc. Ther.
,
14
, pp.
I18
I19
.
You do not currently have access to this content.