In this paper, we present an integrated collaborative modular architecture method for medical device design and development. The methodology is focused on analyzing the input of stakeholder data from existing products and components to achieve an optimal number of modules. The methodology starts by defining a product’s functional and physical decompositions. Product parameters are selected such as quality, reliability, ease of development, and cost. These are prioritized using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to determine the medical device manufacturers’ focus area. The parameters’ subsequent metrics are selected for performance requirements. Next, we evaluate the candidate modules by acquiring stakeholder data and converting them to crisp values by applying the Sugeno fuzzy-based method. Finally, we determine the subsequent optimal module values using a multi-optimization goal programming model. We present here a proof of concept using a typical glucometer. The implication of this work is the determination of the optimal number of product modules based on stakeholder constraints. Hence, an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) can work on fewer components per module without adversely affecting the integrity, quality, and reliability of the final product. Next is the improved quality of patient care by enabling cost reductions in product design and development, thereby improving patient safety. This methodology helps reduce product cycle time, thereby improving market competitiveness among other factors.

1.
Pahl
,
G.
, and
Beitz
,
W.
, 1984,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
,
2nd ed.
,
Springer-Verlag
,
London, UK
.
2.
Nepal
,
B. P.
,
Monplaisir
,
L.
, and
Singh
,
N.
, 2005, “
Integrated Fuzzy Logic Based Model for Product Modularization During Concept Development Phase
,”
Int. J. Prod. Econ.
0925-5273,
96
, pp.
157
174
.
3.
Aguwa
,
C.
, and
Monplaisir
,
L.
, 2009,
Collaborative Architecture Framework for the Design & Manufacturing of Medical Devices
,
PICMET
,
Oregon
, pp.
2246
2249
.
4.
Aguwa
,
C.
, and
Monplaisir
,
L.
, 2009, “
Modular Architecture for Medical Device Design & Manufacturing
,”
Conference Proceedings of the IIE Annual Conference
, Miami, FL, May 30–Jun. 3.
5.
Aguwa
,
C.
, and
Monplaisir
,
L.
, 2009, “
Collaborative Architecture Framework for the Design & Manufacturing of Medical Devices
,”
Proceedings of PICMET 09 Conference
, Portland, OR, Aug. 2–6, pp.
2246
2249
.
6.
Dunne
,
P.
, 2005,
Design and Manufacture of a Multiple Material Sample for Implantation Testing of Thermoplastic Materials Used in a Medical Device, Polymer Testing 24
,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
684
687
.
7.
McAllister
,
P.
, and
Jeswiet
,
J.
, 2003, “
Medical Device Regulation for Manufacturers
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H: J. Eng. Med.
0954-4119,
217
, pp.
459
467
.
8.
Sanderson
,
S.
, and
Uzumeri
,
M.
, 1995, “
Managing Product Families: The Case of the Sony Walkman
,”
Res. Policy
0048-7333,
24
, pp.
761
782
.
9.
Brown
,
A.
,
Eatock
,
J.
,
Dixon
,
D.
,
Meenan
,
B. J.
, and
Anderson
,
J.
, 2008, “
Quality and Continuous Improvement in Medical Device Manufacturing
,”
The TQM Journal
,
20
(
6
), pp.
541
555
.
10.
Simpson
,
T. W.
, and
D’Souza
,
B.
, 2004, “
Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality Within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm
,”
Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl.
1063-293X,
12
(
1
), pp.
119
130
.
11.
Simpson
,
T. W.
,
Maier
,
J. R. A.
, and
Mistree
,
F.
, 2001, “
Product Platform Design: Method and Application
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
0934-9839,
13
(
1
), pp.
2
22
.
12.
Intertek
, “
The Top 10 Reasons Medical Devices Fail-Product Certification Testing the First Time
,” Retrieved 7/7/08 World Wide Web, www.intertek-etlsemko.comswww.intertek-etlsemko.coms
14.
Das
,
S. K.
, and
Almonor
,
J. B.
, 2000. “
A Concurrent Engineering Approach for the Development of Medical Devices
,”
Int. J. Comput. Integrated Manuf.
,
13
(
2
), pp.
139
147
.
15.
Lu
,
R. M. T.
, and
Mazouz
,
K. A.
, 2000, “
A Conceptual Model of Data Warehousing for Medical Device Manufacturers
,”
Proceedings of the 22nd Annual EMBS International Conference
, Chicago, IL, Jul. 23–28.
16.
Yang
,
Q.
,
Qi
,
G.
, and
Gu
,
X.
, 2007, “
Applying Mass Customization to the Production of Industrial Steam Turbines
,”
Int. J. Comput. Integrated Manuf.
0951-192X,
20
, pp.
178
188
.
17.
Nepal
,
B.
,
Monplaisir
,
L.
, and
Singh
,
N.
, 2004. “
A Methodology to Optimize Reliability and Durability of Product Architecture Through Modularization
,”
IIE Annual Conference and Exhibition
, pp.
1257
1262
.
18.
Sii
,
H. S.
,
Ruxton
,
T.
, and
Wang
,
J.
, 2001, “
A Fuzzy-Logic-Based Approach to Qualitative Safety Modeling for Marine Systems
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
0951-8320,
73
, pp.
19
34
.
19.
Tsai
,
Y. T.
, and
Wang
,
K. S.
, 1999, “
The Development of Modular Based Design in Considering Technology Complexity
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
119
, pp.
692
703
.
20.
Yadav
,
O. P.
,
Singh
,
N.
,
Chinnam
,
R. B.
, and
Goel
,
P. S.
, 2003, “
A Fuzzy Logic Based Approach to Reliability Improvement Estimation During Product Development
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
0951-8320,
80
, pp.
63
74
.
21.
Temponi
,
C.
,
Yen
,
J.
, and
Tiao
,
W. A.
, 1999, “
House of Quality: A Fuzzy Logic-Based Requirements Analysis
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
117
, pp.
340
354
.
22.
Ulrich
,
K. T.
, and
Eppinger
,
S. D.
, 2003,
Product Design and Development
,
3rd ed.
,
McGraw-Hill
,
NY
.
23.
Ericsson
,
A.
, and
Erixon
,
G.
, 1999,
Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platform
,
ASME
,
New York
.
24.
Salhieh
,
S. M.
, and
Kamrani
,
A. K.
, 1999, “
Macro Level Product Development Using Design for Modularity
,”
Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manufact.
0736-5845,
15
, pp.
319
329
.
25.
Pahl
,
G.
, and
Beitz
,
W.
, 1996,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
,
2nd ed.
,
K.
Wallace
, ed.,
Springer
,
London
.
26.
Bellman
,
R. E.
, and
Zadeh
,
L. A.
, 1995, “
Decisions Making in Fuzzy Environment
,”
Manage. Sci.
0025-1909,
17
(
4
), pp.
144
164
.
27.
Muffato
,
M.
, 1999, “
Introducing a Platform Strategy in Product Development
,”
Int. J. Prod. Econ.
0925-5273,
60–61
, pp.
145
153
.
28.
Harding
,
J.
,
Popplewell
,
A. K.
,
Fung
,
R. Y. K.
, and
Omar
,
A. R.
, 2001, “
An Intelligent Information Framework Relating Customer Requirements and Product Characteristics
,”
Comput. Ind.
0166-3615,
44
, pp.
51
65
.
29.
Shehab
,
E. M.
, and
Abdalla
,
H. S.
, 2001, “
Manufacturing Cost Modeling for Product Development
,”
Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manufact.
0736-5845,
17
, pp.
341
353
.
30.
Jassbi
,
J. J.
,
Serra
,
P. J. A.
,
Ribeiro
,
R. A.
, and
Donati
,
A.
, 2008, “
A Comparison of Mandani and Sugeno Inference Systems for a Space Fault Detection Application
,”
World Automation Congress (WAC)
, Budapest, Hungary.
31.
Saaty
,
T. A.
, 2005,
Theory and Applications of the Analytical Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Cost and Risks
,
RWS
,
Pittsburgh, PA
.
32.
Yassine
,
A. A.
, 2004, “
An Introduction to Modeling and Analyzing Complex Product Development Processes Using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Method
,” Quaderni di Management (Italian Management Review) 9.
33.
Ignizio
,
J. P.
, and
Cavalier
,
T. M.
, 1994,
Linear Programming
,
Prentice Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
34.
Pesach
,
B.
, 2006, “
Wearable Glucometer
,” Patent No. EP1711101.
35.
Kuo
,
T. C.
,
Huang
,
S. H.
, and
Zhang
,
H. -C.
, 2001, “
Design for Manufacture and Design for ‘X’: Concepts, Applications and Perspectives
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
0360-8352,
41
, pp.
241
260
.
36.
Suh
,
N. P.
, 1995, “
Designing-In of Quality Through Axiomatic Design
,”
IEEE Transactions on Reliability
, pp.
256
264
.
You do not currently have access to this content.