A functional analysis of current laparoscopic surgical technology prompted a redesign of the tools in order to provide multiple functionalities within a single tool. With this redesign came the need for a number of novel mechanisms to actuate and deploy functional tips to the surgical site from their storage locations. In this study we have adopted a multifaceted approach to biomedical device design: functional decomposition to determine problems with the current minimally invasive surgery paradigm, axiomatic design to ensure an efficient design, and quality function deployment to mathematically determine important design criteria. These methods were applied to the design of several novel mechanisms for achieving multifunctionality in a modular surgical instrument. The new actuation mechanism transfers squeezing motion from the hand through a gear train to the distal end of the tool where a pin-slot mechanism actuates the tool tip. The most pronounced change from current technology is the method for rotating the tool’s shaft: rather than a rotary∕rotary interaction using the index finger, a more ergonomic slider mechanism translates linear thumb motion into rotation of the tool’s shaft through a gear train. Finally, rather than locking or unlocking the jaws of the tool using multiple trigger∕ratchet interaction, the new tool uses a binary ratcheting mechanism (similar to a retractable ballpoint pen) to lock or unlock the tool with only one motion. In addition to the actuation mechanisms, the methods for indexing functional tips within the tool and interfacing the tips with a lead screw were redesigned for a modular tool. Rotary indexing of the tool cartridge is done using a Geneva-type mechanism and cam∕follower to provide positive locking once the tip is in place. Transferring the tool tip from the rotary chamber to contact the actuation∕shuttling screw is accomplished using a screw∕wedge assembly to ensure proper attachment. Each of these mechanisms is described and analyzed in detail to show the overall improvement in surgical performance of this novel tool. The benefits identified include multiple functionalities in a single tool, ergonomic benefits of an increased input∕output force scaling, decreased out-of-plane motion required to rotate the tool’s shaft, and decreased cognitive load required to lock and unlock the tool’s jaws.

1.
Richardson
,
W. S.
, and
Hunter
,
J. G.
, 2000, “
Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication
,” in
Mastery of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery
,
W. S.
Eubanks
,
L. L.
Swanström
, and
N. J.
Soper
, eds.,
Williams and Wilkins
,
Philadelphia, PA
, pp.
144
153
.
2.
Hunter
,
J. G.
, and
Sackier
,
J. M.
, 1993,
Minimally Invasive Surgery
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
3.
Vallancien
,
G.
,
Cathelineau
,
X.
,
Baumert
,
H.
,
Doublet
,
J. D.
, and
Guillonneau
,
B.
, 2002, “
Complications of Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology: Review of 1,311 Procedures at a Single Center
,”
J. Urol. (Baltimore)
0022-5347,
168
(
1
), pp.
23
26
.
4.
Saperstein
,
D. A.
, and
Capone
,
A.
, 1999,
Pars Plana Vitrectomy
,
Saunders
,
Philadelphia, PA
, pp.
333
356
.
5.
Melzer
,
A.
, 1996,
Endoscopic Instruments: Conventional and Intelligent
,
Churchill Livingstone
,
New York
, pp.
69
95
.
6.
Sharma
,
T.
, and
Gopal
,
L.
, 2000, “
Recent Developments in Vitreoretinal Surgery
,”
J. Indian Med. Assoc.
0019-5847,
98
(
12
), pp.
754
762
.
7.
Miller
,
D. J.
,
Nelson
,
C. A.
, and
Oleynikov
,
D.
, 2007, “
Design of a Novel Multifunction Tool to Shorten OR Time
,”
Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Annual Scientific Session and Postgraduate Course (SAGES 2007)
,
Las Vegas, NV
, pp.
105
106
.
8.
Dexter
,
F.
, 2006, “
Maximizing Operating Room Staff Productivity
,” URL: http://www.uihealthcare.com/news/currents/vol2issue3/5operatingroom.htmlhttp://www.uihealthcare.com/news/currents/vol2issue3/5operatingroom.html, Accessed: 10∕02∕07.
9.
Brock
,
D. L.
, 2005, “
Interchangeable Instrument
,” U.S. Patent No. 6,860,878.
10.
Nelson
,
C. A.
,
Miller
,
D. J.
, and
Oleynikov
,
D.
, 2007, “
Design Methodology for a Novel Multifunction Laparoscopic Tool: Engineering for Surgeons’ Needs
,”
Proceedings of the Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 15 (MMVR15)
,
Long Beach, CA
, Feb. 6–9, IOS Press, Vol.
125
, pp.
343
348
.
11.
Frecker
,
M.
, and
Snyder
,
A. J.
, 2005, “
Surgical Robotics: Multifunctional End Effectors for Robotic Surgery
,”
Operative Techniques in General Surgery
,
7
(
4
), pp.
165
169
.
12.
Frecker
,
M. I.
,
Powell
,
K. M.
, and
Haluck
,
R.
, 2005, “
Design of a Multifunctional Compliant Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
127
(
6
), pp.
990
993
.
13.
Dieter
,
G. E.
, 2000,
Engineering Design
,
McGraw-Hill
,
Boston, MA
.
14.
Suh
,
N. P.
, 1990,
The Principles of Design
,
Oxford University Press
,
New York
.
15.
Hauser
,
J. R.
, and
Clausing
,
D.
, 1988,
The House of Quality
,
Harvard Business School, Publication Division
,
Cambridge, MA
, pp.
63
73
.
16.
Escalas
,
F.
,
Galante
,
J.
, and
Rostoker
,
W.
, 1976, “
Biocompatibility of Materials for Total Joint Replacement
,”
J. Biomed. Mater. Res.
0021-9304,
10
(
2
), pp.
175
195
.
17.
Von Recum
,
A. F.
, 1986,
Handbook of Biomaterials Evaluation: Scientific, Technical, and Clinical Testing of Implant Materials
,
Macmillan
,
New York
, p.
611
.
18.
Alexander
,
H.
,
Brunski
,
J. B.
,
Cooper
,
S. L.
,
Hench
,
H. L.
,
Hergenrother
,
R. W.
,
Hoffamn
,
A. S.
,
Kohn
,
J.
,
Langer
,
R.
,
Peppas
,
N. A.
,
Ratner
,
B. D.
,
Shalaby
,
S. W.
,
Visser
,
S. W.
, and
Yannas
,
I. V.
, 1996,
Classes of Materials Used in Medicine
,
Academic
,
San Diego, CA
, pp.
37
50
.
19.
Garrett
,
J. W.
, 1971, “
The Adult Human Hand: Some Anthropometric and Biomechanical Considerations
,”
Hum. Factors
0018-7208,
13
(
2
), pp.
117
131
.
20.
Tuplin
,
W. A.
, 1957, “
Designing Compound Epicyclic Gear Trains for Maximum Efficiency at High Velocity Ratios
,”
Mach. Des.
0024-9114,
29
, pp.
100
104
.
21.
DiMartino
,
A.
,
Judkins
,
T. N.
,
Doné
,
K.
,
Morse
,
J.
,
Melander
,
J.
,
Hallbeck
,
M. S.
, and
Oleynikov
,
D.
, 2004, “
Ergonomic Laparoscopic Tool Handle Design
,”
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting
,
New Orleans, LA
, Vol.
2
, pp.
1354
1358
.
22.
Grigoriev
,
I. S.
, and
Meilikhov
,
E. Z.
, 1997,
Handbook of Physical Quantities
,
CRC
,
Boca Raton, FL
, p.
1568
.
23.
Berguer
,
R.
,
Smith
,
W. D.
, and
Chung
,
Y. H.
, 2001, “
Performing Laparoscopic Surgery is Significantly More Stressful for the Surgeon Than Open Surgery
,”
Surg. Endosc
0930-2794,
15
(
10
), pp.
1204
1207
.
24.
Carswell
,
C. M.
,
Clarke
,
D.
, and
Seales
,
W. B.
, 2005, “
Assessing Mental Workload During Laparoscopic Surgery
,”
Surgical Innovation
,
12
(
1
), pp.
80
90
.
You do not currently have access to this content.