Abstract

Risk assessment is a critical step in the roadmap of medical device development (MDD). Failure modes, effects and criticality analysis is a common approach based on declarative prior information that proved beneficial in the risk assessment of well-established processes. But at early steps of development when innovative materials or technologies are embedded, the lack of experience on those innovations introduces too much subjectivity in failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) for a robust risk assessment. Since mid-2000, the quality-by-design (QbD) guideline has been proposed within the pharmaceutical industry as a pro-active engineering approach to drug development. This paradigm enables a data-driven risk assessment throughout the development workflow, which completes the risk assessment provided by FMECA. Nevertheless, its implementation guide is unclear and not flexible enough to be efficiently applied to the development of medical devices. To address this issue, a new quality by design (QbD) paradigm indexed on the technological readiness level of the innovative product is proposed. It covers the development of medical devices throughout the whole preclinical phase and is composed of at least nine learning cycles. The first part of this medical device QbD layout, composed of three consecutive risk assessment cycles, is evaluated through a real study case with the objective to demonstrate the proof of concept of a photobleaching controller in photodynamic therapy. Beyond this experimental result, this application has confirmed practical ability of the indexed quality by design (iQbD) approach to complete FMECA and to provide an alternative solution to risk assessment when prior knowledge on the technological innovation is not available.

References

1.
Medina
,
L. A.
,
Kremer
,
G. E. O.
, and
Wysk
,
R. A.
,
2013
, “
Supporting Medical Device Development: A Standard Product Design Process Model
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
24
(
2
), pp.
83
119
.10.1080/09544828.2012.676635
2.
Ham
,
S. T.
,
2010
, “Mapping the Medical Device Development Process,” California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, accessed Feb. 17, 2022, https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=itsp
3.
Santos
,
I. C.
,
Gazelle
,
G. S.
,
Rocha
,
L. A.
, and
Tavares
,
J. M. R.
,
2012
, “
An Ontology Model for the Medical Device Development Process in Europe
,”
The 1st International Conference on Design and Processes for Medical Devices-PROMED 2012
, Brescia, Italy, May 2–4.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224904426_An_Ontology_Model_for_the_Medical_Device_Development_Process_in_Europe
4.
Buzan
,
T.
,
2013
,
Mind Map Handbook: The Ultimate Thinking Tool
,
HarperCollins
, Glasgow,
UK
.
5.
Mollberg
,
N.
,
Surati
,
M.
,
Demchuk
,
C.
,
Fathi
,
R.
,
Salama
,
A.
,
Husain
,
A.
,
Hensing
,
T.
, and
Salgia
,
R.
,
2011
, “
Mind-Mapping for Lung Cancer: Towards a Personalized Therapeutics Approach
,”
Adv. Therapy
,
28
(
3
), pp.
173
194
.10.1007/s12325-010-0103-9
6.
Juran
,
J. M.
,
1993
, “
Quality Planning and Analysis: From Product Development Through Use
,” 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Companies, New York.
7.
Elahi
,
B.
,
2018
,
Safety Risk Management for Medical Devices
,
Academic Press
, London, UK.
8.
Singh
,
K.
, and
Selvam
,
P.
,
2020
, “
Medical Device Risk Management
,”
Trends in Development of Medical Devices
,
Elsevier
Academic Press, London, UK, pp.
65
76
.
9.
Committee for Human Medicinal Products
,
2015
, ICH Guideline Q9 on Quality Risk Management, European Medicine Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
10.
Stamatis
,
D. H.
,
2003
,
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA From Theory to Execution
,
Quality Press
, Milwaukee, WI.
11.
Liu
,
H.-C.
,
Liu
,
L.
, and
Liu
,
N.
,
2013
, “
Risk Evaluation Approaches in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: A Literature Review
,”
Expert Systems Appl.
,
40
(
2
), pp.
828
838
.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010
12.
Driessen
,
M.
,
Arts
,
J.
,
van Houtum
,
G.-J.
,
Rustenburg
,
J. W.
, and
Huisman
,
B.
,
2014
, “
Maintenance Spare Parts Planning and Control: A Framework for Control and Agenda for Future Research
,”
Prod. Plann. Control
,
26
(
5
), pp.
1
426
.10.1080/09537287.2014.907586
13.
Mentes
,
A.
, and
Ozen
,
E.
,
2015
, “
A Hybrid Risk Analysis Method for a Yacht Fuel System Safety
,”
Saf. Sci.
,
79
, pp.
94
104
.10.1016/j.ssci.2015.05.010
14.
Brun
,
A.
, and
Savino
,
M. M.
,
2018
, “
Assessing Risk Through Composite FMEA With Pairwise Matrix and Markov Chains
,”
Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage.
,
35
(
9
), pp.
1709
1733
.10.1108/IJQRM-04-2017-0080
15.
Subriadi
,
A. P.
, and
Najwa
,
N. F.
,
2020
, “
The Consistency Analysis of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) in Information Technology Risk Assessment
,”
Heliyon
,
6
(
1
), p.
e03161
10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03161.
16.
Powell
,
T. C.
,
1995
, “
Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage: A Review and Empirical Study
,”
Strategic Manage. J.
,
16
(
1
), pp.
15
37
.10.1002/smj.4250160105
17.
Bergman
,
B.
, and
Klefsjo
,
B.
,
2010
,
Quality From Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction
,
Studentlitteratur AB
, Lund, Sweden.
18.
Yang
,
K.
, and
El-Haik
,
B.
,
2003
,
Design for Six Sigma
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
19.
Juran
,
J.
,
1992
,
Juran on Quality by Design: The New Steps for Planning Quality Into Goods and Services
,
Free Press
, New York.
20.
ICH Expert Working Group,
2009
, “
Pharmaceutical Development Q8(R2)
,”
International Conference on Harmonisation on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use
.https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q8_R2_Guideline.pdf
21.
FDA
,
1997
, Design control guidance for medical device manufacturers, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, No. FDA 21 CFR 820.30.
22.
Rivero
,
A. M.
,
Monteiro
,
E. C.
,
Leite
,
D. S.
,
Tannenbaum
,
F. S.
,
Pinto
,
M. A.
, and
Leite
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Implementing First Stages of Quality by Design Approach in the Development of an Assistive Robotics Technology
,”
XXI IMEKO World Congress
, Prague, Czech Republic, Aug. 30–Sept. 4, pp.
1295
1299
.https://www.imeko.org/publications/wc-2015/IMEKO-WC-2015-TC13-262.pdf
23.
Martinez-Marquez
,
D.
,
Mirnajafizadeh
,
A.
,
Carty
,
C. P.
, and
Stewart
,
R. A.
,
2018
, “
Application of Quality by Design for 3D Printed Bone Prostheses and Scaffolds
,”
PloS One
,
13
(
4
), p.
e0195291
.10.1371/journal.pone.0195291
25.
Moser
,
J. G.
,
1998
,
Photodynamic Tumor Therapy: 2nd and 3rd Generation Photosensitizers
,
Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
.
26.
Dougherty
,
T.
,
Gomer
,
C. J.
,
Henderson
,
B. W.
,
Jori
,
G.
,
Kessel
,
D.
,
Korbelik
,
M.
,
Moan
,
J.
, and
Peng
,
Q.
,
1998
, “
Photodynamic Therapy
,”
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
,
90
(
12
), pp.
889
905
.10.1093/jnci/90.12.889
27.
Goldman
,
M. P.
,
2005
,
Photodynamic Therapy
,
W.B. Saunders Company
, Philadelphia, PA.
28.
Tylcz
,
J.-B.
,
Bastogne
,
T. T.
,
Bourguignon
,
A.
,
Frochot
,
C.
, and
Barberi-Heyob
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Realtime Tracking of the Photobleaching Trajectory During Photodynamic Therapy
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
,
64
(
8
), pp.
1742
1749
.10.1109/TBME.2016.2620239
29.
Wong
,
K. C.
,
2011
, “Using an Ishikawa Diagram as a Tool to Assist Memory and Retrieval of Relevant Medical Cases From the Medical Literature,”
J. Med. Case Rep.
, 5(1), pp. 1–3.10.1186/1752-1947-5-120
30.
Fink
,
C.
,
Enk
,
A.
, and
Gholam
,
P.
,
2015
, “
Photodynamic Therapy–Aspects of Pain Management
,”
J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges.
,
13
(
1
), pp.
15
22
.10.1111/ddg.12546
31.
Agency
,
E. M.
,
2013
, “
Reflection Paper on Risk Based Quality Management in Clinical Trials
,”
Compliance Insp.
,
44
, pp.
1
15
.https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/reflection-paper-risk-based-quality-management-clinical-trials_en.pdf
32.
Hurley
,
C.
,
Shiely
,
F.
,
Power
,
J.
,
Clarke
,
M.
,
Eustace
,
J. A.
,
Flanagan
,
E.
, and
Kearney
,
P. M.
,
2016
, “
Risk Based Monitoring (Rbm) Tools for Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
,”
Contemp. Clinical Trials
,
51
, pp.
15
27
.10.1016/j.cct.2016.09.003
33.
Huang
,
G. D.
,
Bull
,
J.
,
McKee
,
K. J.
,
Mahon
,
E.
,
Harper
,
B.
, and
Roberts
,
J. N.
,
2018
, “
Clinical Trials Recruitment Planning: A Proposed Framework From the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative
,”
Contemp. Clinical Trials
,
66
, pp.
74
79
.10.1016/j.cct.2018.01.003
34.
Committee for Human Medicinal Products
,
2017
, ICH guideline Q8 (R2) on Pharmaceutical Development, European Medicine Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
35.
Committee for Human Medicinal Products
,
2012
, ICH guideline Q11 on Development and Manufacture of Drug Substances (Chemical Entities And Biotechnological/Biological Entities), European Medicine Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
36.
Committee for Human Medicinal Products
,
2016
, ICH Guideline E6 on Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2), European Medicine Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
37.
Kourti
,
T.
, and
Davis
,
B.
,
2012
, “
The Business Benefits of Quality by Design (Qbd)
,”
Pharm. Eng.
,
32
(
7
), pp.
52
62.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286997791_The_business_benefits_of_quality_by_design_QbD
38.
Junker
,
B. H.
,
2012
, “Building a Business Case for Biopharmaceutical QbD Implementation (Peer Reviewed),”
BioPharm International Magazine
, 25(8).https://www.biopharminternational.com/view/building-business-casebiopharmaceutical-qbd-implementation-peer-reviewed
39.
Morales
,
J. M. H.
,
2015
, “
Evaluating Biocompatible Barrier Films as Encapsulants of Medical Micro Devices
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, Université Grenoble Alpes, Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France.https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01289295/document
You do not currently have access to this content.