Improperly designed medical devices can induce unwanted biomechanical stressors on their users, impacting health and career longevity. Despite this, manufacturers struggle to balance device design with the growing female surgeon population. We have applied anthropometry to a population of surgeon hands as an alternative to preferred glove size. Correlations to physical dimensions of two laparoscopic staplers were assessed. Five anthropometric measurements were taken from dominant hands of surgeons. These measurements were selected with the goal of comparing resulting data to published anthropometry studies and assessing correlation to preferred glove size and instrument design. The trigger reach of the two laparoscopic staplers were measured to assess suitability among the surgeon population surveyed. Fifty eight surgeons (50 male, 8 female), average glove size 7.5 and 6.0, were measured. Data indicate that male surgeons had significantly larger hands than female. Hand circumference displayed a relatively strong positive correlation with preferred glove size (0.799, R2 = 63.9%); other measurements did not. The trigger span of one stapler was found suitable for only 78.2% of male and 30.9% of female surgeons, based on comparisons with anthropometry of the surveyed population. Anthropometry should be used to characterize surgeon hands instead of preferred glove size. Also, from the limited scope of this research, discrepancies exist between the size of the surgeon hand and the devices designed for their use. The use of inappropriately designed instrumentation can cause musculoskeletal injury, decreased productivity, and shortened careers. Manufacturers would benefit by consulting anthropometry databases to develop products.

References

References
1.
Sutton
,
E.
,
Irvin
,
M.
,
Zeigler
,
C.
,
Lee
,
G.
, and
Park
,
A.
,
2014
, “
The Ergonomics of Women in Surgery
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
28
(
4
), pp.
1051
1055
.
2.
Berguer
,
R.
, and
Hreljac
,
A.
,
2004
, “
The Relationship Between Hand Size and Difficulty Using Surgical Instruments: A Survey of 726 Laparoscopic Surgeons
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
18
(
3
), pp.
508
512
.
3.
Cohen
,
D. L.
,
Naik
,
J. R.
,
Tamariz
,
L. J.
, and
Madanick
,
R. D.
,
2008
, “
The Perception of Gastroenterology Fellows Towards the Relationship Between Hand Size and Endoscopic Training
,”
Dig. Dis. Sci.
,
53
(
7
), pp.
1902
1909
.
4.
Adams
,
D. M.
,
Fenton
,
S. J.
,
Schirmer
,
B. D.
,
Mahvi
,
D. M.
,
Horvath
,
K.
, and
Nichol
,
P.
,
2008
, “
One Size Does Not Fit All: Current Disposable Laparoscopic Devices Do Not Fit the Needs of Female Laparoscopic Surgeons
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
22
(
10
), pp.
2310
2313
.
5.
Harvin
,
G.
,
2014
, “
Review of Musculoskeletal Injuries and Prevention in the Endoscopy Practitioner
,”
J. Clin. Gastroenterol.
,
48
(
7
), pp.
590
594
.
6.
Kono
,
E.
,
Tada
,
M.
,
Kouchi
,
M.
,
Endo
,
Y.
,
Tomizawa
,
Y.
,
Matsuo
,
T.
, and
Nomura
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Ergonomic Evaluation of a Mechanical Anastomotic Stapler Used by Japanese Surgeons
,”
Surg. Today
,
44
(
6
), pp.
1040
1047
.
7.
Kono
,
E.
,
Tomizawa
,
Y.
,
Matsuo
,
T.
, and
Nomura
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Rating and Issues of Mechanical Anastomotic Staplers in Surgical Practice: A Survey of 241 Japanese Gastroenterological Surgeons
,”
Surg. Today
,
42
(
10
), pp.
962
972
.
8.
Park
,
A.
,
Lee
,
G.
,
Seagull
,
F. J.
,
Meenaghan
,
N.
, and
Dexter
,
D.
,
2010
, “
Patients Benefit While Surgeons Suffer: An Impending Epidemic
,”
J. Am. Coll. Surg.
,
210
(
3
), pp.
306
313
.
9.
Greiner
,
T. M.
,
1991
,
Hand Anthropometry of U.S. Army Personnel
,
U.S. Army Natick Research, Development & Engineering Center
,
Natick, MA
.
10.
Filisetti
,
C.
,
Cho
,
A.
,
Riccipetitoni
,
G.
, and
Saxena
,
A. K.
,
2015
, “
Analysis of Hand Size and Ergonomics of Instruments in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery
,”
Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech.
,
25
(
5
), pp.
e159
e162
.
11.
Pheasant
,
S.
, and
Haslegrave
,
C. M.
,
2005
,
Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work
,
3rd ed.
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
12.
Welcker
,
K.
,
Kesieme
,
E. B.
,
Internullo
,
E.
, and
Kranenburg van Koppen
,
L. J. C.
,
2012
, “
Ergonomics in Thoracoscopic Surgery: Results of a Survey Among Thoracic Surgeons
,”
Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg.
,
15
(
2
), pp.
197
200
.
13.
Uhrich
,
M. L.
,
Underwood
,
R. A.
,
Standeven
,
J. W.
,
Soper
,
N. J.
, and
Engsberg
,
J. R.
,
2002
, “
Assessment of Fatigue, Monitor Placement, and Surgical Experience During Simulated Laparoscopic Surgery
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
16
(
4
), pp.
635
639
.
14.
Meara
,
J. G.
,
Leather
,
A. J. M.
,
Hagander
,
L.
,
Alkire
,
B. C.
,
Alonso
,
N.
,
Ameh
,
E. A.
,
Bickler
,
S. W.
,
Conteh
,
L.
,
Dare
,
A. J.
,
Davies
,
J.
,
Mérisier
,
E. D.
,
El-Halabi
,
S.
,
Farmer
,
P. E.
,
Gawande
,
A.
,
Gillies
,
R.
,
Greenberg
,
S. L. M.
,
Grimes
,
C. E.
,
Gruen
,
R. L.
,
Ismail
,
E. A.
,
Kamara
,
T. B.
,
Lavy
,
C.
,
Lundeg
,
G.
,
Mkandawire
,
N. C.
,
Raykar
,
N. P.
,
Riesel
,
J. N.
,
Rodas
,
E.
,
Rose
,
J.
,
Roy
,
N.
,
Shrime
,
M. G.
,
Sullivan
,
R.
,
Verguet
,
S.
,
Watters
,
D.
,
Weiser
,
T. G.
,
Wilson
,
I. H.
,
Yamey
,
G.
, and
Yip
,
W.
,
2016
, “
Global Surgery 2030: Evidence and Solutions for Achieving Health, Welfare, and Economic Development
,”
Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.
,
25
, pp.
75
78
.
15.
Fuchs
,
K. H.
,
Babic
,
B.
,
Breithaupt
,
W.
,
Dallemagne
,
B.
,
Fingerhut
,
A.
,
Furnee
,
E.
,
Granderath
,
F.
,
Horvath
,
P.
,
Kardos
,
P.
,
Pointner
,
R.
,
Savarino
,
E.
,
Van Herwaarden-Lindeboom
,
M.
, and
Zaninotto
,
G.
, and
European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)
,
2014
, “
EAES Recommendations for the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
28
(
6
), pp.
1753
1773
.
16.
Myers
,
S. R.
,
McGuirl
,
J.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes
,”
Obes. Surg.
,
23
(
4
), pp.
467
473
.
17.
Anakwe
,
R. E.
,
Huntley
,
J. S.
, and
McEachan
,
J. E.
,
2007
, “
Grip Strength and Forearm Circumference in a Healthy Population
,”
J. Hand Surg. Eur. Vol.
,
32
(
2
), pp.
203
209
.
18.
Edgren
,
C. S.
,
Radwin
,
R. G.
, and
Irwin
,
C. B.
,
2004
, “
Grip Force Vectors for Varying Handle Diameters and Hand Sizes
,”
Hum. Factors
,
46
(
2
), pp.
244
251
.
You do not currently have access to this content.