Surgical endoscopy has gained traction over the past several decades as a viable option for therapeutic interventions in the gastrointestinal tract. It utilizes natural orifice access which shortens hospital stay, minimizes patient discomfort, and decreases overall healthcare costs. However, the inability to effectively retract and position target tissue is a significant limitation for these procedures. Current instruments are unable to triangulate and can only be manually withdrawn or advanced through the channels. There is a need to provide better access and control of soft tissue to be able to perform more complex and complete endoscopic resections. We have developed a novel device to provide optimal tissue retraction for endoscopic procedures. Our device consists of an articulating tissue retractor and a specialized handle. Two articulating curves were created that can manipulate the position and direction of the retractor tip. Each curve is independently adjusted by locking thumb sliders, allowing for increased range of motion and retraction independent of endoscope position. With a diameter of 2.8 mm, the proposed device can be used in current endoscopic equipment. Preliminary testing showed that our retractor has comparable slip strength to a commercially available device (1.13 N ± 0.53 N versus 1.10 N ± 0.51 N, p-value: 0.416), but has much greater range of motion (maximum deflection of 72 deg compared to 0 deg). This increased range of motion allows the articulating grasper to better triangulate and preserve visualization of the dissection plane, allowing it to overcome the most significant barrier restricting endoscopic surgery.

References

References
1.
Chellali
,
A.
, and
Cao
,
C.
,
2013
, “
The Impact of New Instruments on Surgical Performance in Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery
,”
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
, San Diego, CA, Sept. 30–Oct. 4, Vol.
57
, pp.
663
667
.
2.
Tessier
,
C.
,
Zhang
,
L.
, and
Cao
,
C.
,
2012
, “
Ergonomic Considerations in Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): A Case Study
,”
Work: J. Prev., Assess. Rehabil.
,
41
(
1
), pp.
4683
4688
.
3.
Von Renteln
,
D.
,
Vassiliou
,
M.
,
Rösch
,
T.
, and
Rothstein
,
R.
,
2011
, “
Triangulation: Holy Grail of Endoscopic Surgery?
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
25
(
5
), pp.
1355
1357
.
4.
Maple
,
J. T.
,
Dayyeh
,
B.
,
Chauhan
,
S.
,
Hwang
,
J.
,
Komanduri
,
S.
,
Manfredi
,
M.
,
Konda
,
V.
,
Murad
,
F.
,
Siddiqui
,
U.
, and
Banerjee
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
,”
Gastrointest. Endosc.
,
81
(
6
), pp.
1311
1325
.
5.
Breedveld
,
P.
, and
Hoeven
,
F. H. V. D.
,
2011
, “
Skull Base Surgery With Multi-Steerable Instruments
,”
Third Dutch Bio-Medical Engineering Conference
, Egmond ann Zee, The Netherlands, Jan. 20–21.http://bme2011.fyper.com/mobview/presentation/94
6.
Parretta
,
S.
,
Dallemagne
,
B.
,
Barry
,
B.
, and
Marescaux
,
J.
,
2013
, “
The ANUBISCOPE® Flexible Platform Ready for Prime Time: Description of the First Clinical Case
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
27
(
7
), p.
2630
.
7.
Fuchs
,
K.
, and
Breithaupt
,
W.
,
2012
, “
Transgastric Small Bowel Resection With the New Multitasking Platform EndoSAMURAI™ for Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
26
(
8
), pp.
2281
2287
.
8.
Centers of Disease Control
,
2015
, “
CDC Statement: Los Angeles County/UCLA Investigation of CRE Transmission and Duodenoscopes
,” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, accessed Feb. 14, 2017, https://www.cdc.gov/hai/outbreaks/cdcstatement-la-cre.html
9.
Food and Drug Administratio
n,
2015
, “
Design of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Duodenoscopes May Impede Effective Cleaning: FDA Safety Communication
,” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, accessed Jan. 28, 2017, http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm434871.htm
10.
Chung
,
H.
,
Diana
,
M.
,
Liu
,
K.
,
Dallemagne
,
B.
, and
Marescaux
,
J.
,
2015
, “
East Meets West—A Novel Steerable Grasper to Facilitate Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD): Randomized Comparative Study in a Porcine Model
,”
Surg. Innovation
,
22
(
2
), pp.
117
122
.
11.
Feussner
,
H.
,
Becker
,
V.
,
Baur
,
M.
,
Kranzfelder
,
M.
,
Schirren
,
R.
,
Lüth
,
T.
,
Meining
,
A.
, and
Wilhelm
,
D.
,
2015
, “
Developments in Flexible Endoscopic Surgery: A Review
,”
Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol.
,
8
, pp.
31
42
.
12.
Chung
,
H.
,
Dhumane
,
P.
,
Liu
,
K.
,
Donatelli
,
G.
,
Dallemagne
,
B.
, and
Marescaux
,
J.
,
2014
, “
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection With a Novel Traction Method Using a Steerable Grasper: A Feasibility Study in a Porcine Model
,”
Surg. Innovation
,
21
(
1
), pp.
5
10
.
13.
Boston Scientific
,
2014
, “
Single-Use Radial Jaw 4
,” Boston Scientific Corp., Malborough, MA, accessed Nov. 17, 2015, http://www.bostonscientific.com/en-US/products/forceps/single-use-radial-jaw-4-biopsy-forceps.html
You do not currently have access to this content.