This paper provides an efficient method of analysis for a fixed-guided compliant beam with an inflection point, subjected to beam end load or displacement boundary conditions, or a combination thereof. To enable this, such a beam is modeled as a pair of well-established pseudo-rigid-body models (PRBMs) for fixed-free compliant beam segments. The analysis procedure relies on the properties of inflection in developing the necessary set of parametric, static equilibrium and compatibility equations for solution. The paper further discusses the multiplicity of possible solutions, including displacement configurations, for any two specified beam end displacement boundary conditions, depending on the locations and types of the effecting loads on the beam to meet these boundary conditions. A unique solution may exist when a third beam end displacement boundary condition is specified; however, this selection is not unconditional. A concept of characteristic deflection domain is proposed to assist with the selection of the third boundary condition to yield a realistic solution. The analysis method is also used to synthesize a simple, fully compliant mechanism utilizing the fixed-guided compliant segments.

References

References
1.
Midha
,
A.
,
Norton
,
T. W.
, and
Howell
,
L. L.
,
1994
, “
On the Nomenclature, Classification, and Abstractions of Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
116
(
1
), pp.
270
279
.10.1115/1.2919358
2.
Midha
,
A.
, and
Her
,
I.
,
1985
,
Research Notes
,
Purdue University
,
West Lafayette, IN
.
3.
Salamon
,
B. A.
,
1989
, “
Mechanical Advantage Aspects in Compliant Mechanisms Design
,” M.S. thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
4.
Salamon
,
B. A.
, and
Midha
,
A.
,
1998
, “
An Introduction to Mechanical Advantage in Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
120
(
1
), pp.
311
315
.10.1115/1.2826974
5.
Howell
,
L. L.
,
2001
,
Compliant Mechanisms
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
6.
Howell
,
L. L.
, and
Midha
,
A.
,
1995
, “
Parametric Deflection Approximations for End-Loaded, Large-Deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
117
(
1
), pp.
156
165
.10.1115/1.2826101
7.
Howell
,
L. L.
, and
Midha
,
A.
,
1994
, “
A Method for the Design of Compliant Mechanisms With Small-Length Flexural Pivots
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
116
(
1
), pp.
280
290
.10.1115/1.2919359
8.
Howell
,
L. L.
,
Midha
,
A.
, and
Norton
,
T. W.
,
1996
, “
Evaluation of Equivalent Spring Stiffness for Use in a Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model of Large-Deflection Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
118
(
1
), pp.
126
131
.10.1115/1.2826843
9.
Zhang
,
A.
, and
Chen
,
G.
,
2013
, “
A Comprehensive Elliptic Integral Solution to the Large Deflection Problems of Thin Beams in Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Rob.
,
5
(
2
), p.
021006
.10.1115/1.4023558
10.
Mavanthoor
,
A.
,
2003
, “
Design and Stability Analysis of Compliant Mechanisms
,” M.S. thesis, University of Missouri–Rolla, Rolla, MO.
11.
Mavanthoor
,
A.
, and
Midha
,
A.
,
2006
, “
Bistable Compliant Four-Bar Mechanisms With a Single Torsional Spring
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2006-99453.10.1115/DETC2006-99453
12.
Lyon
,
S. M.
,
2003
, “
The Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model for Dynamic Predictions of Macro and Micro Compliant Mechanisms
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
13.
Lyon
,
S. M.
,
Howell
,
L. L.
, and
Roach
,
G. M.
,
2000
, “
Modeling Fixed-Fixed Flexible Segments Via the Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model
,”
ASME Dynamics and Control Division, at the 2000 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
, Orlando, FL, November 5–10, Vol. 69-2, pp.
883
990
.
14.
Kimball
,
C.
, and
Tsai
,
W.
,
2002
, “
Modeling of Flexural Beams Subjected to Arbitrary Ends Loads
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
124
(
2
), pp.
223
235
.10.1115/1.1455031
15.
Holst
,
G. L.
,
Teichert
,
G. H.
, and
Jensen
,
B. D.
, “
Modeling and Experiments of Buckling Modes and Deflection of Fixed-Guided Beams in Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
133
(
5
), p.
051002
.10.1115/1.4003922
16.
Mettlach
,
G. A.
,
1996
, “
Analysis and Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using Analytical and Graphical Techniques
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
17.
Mettlach
,
G. A.
, and
Midha
,
A.
,
1999
, “
Characteristic Deflection Domain Concept in Compliant Mechanism Design and Analysis
,”
6th National Applied Mechanisms & Robotics Conference
, Cincinnati, OH, December, pp.
27-01
27-06
.
18.
Saxena
,
A.
, and
Kramer
,
S. N.
,
1998
, “
A Simple and Accurate Method for Determining Large Deflections in Compliant Mechanisms Subjected to End Forces and Moments
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
120
(
3
), pp.
392
400
.10.1115/1.2829164
19.
Kim
,
C.
,
2011
, “
Curve Decomposition Analysis for Fixed-Guided Beams With Application to Statically Balanced Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2011-47829.10.1115/DETC2011-47829
20.
Pauly
,
J.
, and
Midha
,
A.
,
2004
, “
Improved Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model Parameter Values for End-Force-Loaded Compliant Beams
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2004-57580.10.1115/DETC2004-57580
21.
Her
,
I.
,
Midha
,
A.
, and
Salamon
,
B. A.
,
1992
, “
A Methodology for Compliant Mechanisms Design: Part II—Shooting Method and Application
,”
Advances in Design Automation—1992
,
18th ASME Design Automation Conference
,
Scottsdale, AZ
, September 13–16, Vol. 44-2, pp.
39
45
.
22.
Finch
,
N.
,
Griner
,
J.
,
Lange
,
S.
, and
Rieker
,
G.
,
2002
, “
Compliant Micro-Restrainer
,” Senior Design Project Report, A. Midha, Advisor, ME 261: Engineering Design, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, Project Sponsored by Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
You do not currently have access to this content.