Avoiding singularities in the workspace of a parallel robot is an important issue. The case of 3-RPR planar robots is an important subject of theoretical studies. We study the singularities of planar 3-RPR robots by using a new parameterization of the singular locus in a modified workspace. This approach enables us to give a simple alternative proof of a result recently proved by Husty: the complement of the singular locus in the workspace of a generic 3-RPR manipulator has two connected components (called aspects); we also give a procedure to design a singularity-free path connecting any two points in the same aspect. The parameterization introduced in this paper, due to its simple geometric properties, proves to be useful for the study of the singularities of 3-RPR robots.

References

References
1.
Innocenti
,
C.
, and
Parenti-Castelli
,
V.
, 1992,
Singularity-Free Evolution From One Configuration to Another in Serial and Fully-Parallel Manipulators
,”
Proceedings of ASME Design Technical Conferences
, Spatial Mechanisms and Mechanical Systems, DE-Vol.
45
, pp.
553
560
.
2.
Wenger
,
P.
, and
Chablat
,
D.
, 1998, “
Workspace and Assembly-Modes in Fully-Parallel Manipulators: A Descriptive Study
,”
Advances in Robot Kinematics and Computational Geometry
,
Kluwer Academic Publishers
, Dordrecht, pp.
117
126
.
3.
Mcaree
,
P. R.
, and
Daniel
,
R. W.
, 1999, “
An Explanation of Never-Special Assembly Changing Motions for 3-3 Parallel Manipulators
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
18
(
6
), pp.
556
574
.
4.
H.
Bamberger
,
A.
Wolf
, and
M.
Shoham
, 2008, “
Assembly Mode Changing in Parallel Mechanisms
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
24
(
4
), pp.
765
772
.
5.
Hernandez
,
A.
,
Altuzarra
,
O.
,
Petuya
,
V.
, and
Macho
,
E.
, 2009,
Defining Conditions for Nonsingular Transitions Between Assembly Modes
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
25
(
6
), pp.
1438
1447
.
6.
Husty
,
M. L.
, 2009,
Non-Singular Assembly Mode Change in 3-RPR-Parallel Manipulators
,”
Computational Kinematics: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computational Kinematics
, Springer-Verlag, pp.
51
60
.
7.
Hunt
,
K. H.
, 1983,
Structural Kinematics of In-Parallel Actuated Robot Arms
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des.
,
105
(
4
), pp.
705
712
.
8.
Pennock
,
G. R.
, and
Kassner
,
D. J.
, 1990, “
Kinematic Analysis of a Planar Eight-Bar Linkage: Application to a Platform-Type Robot
,” ASME Proceedings of the 21th Biennial Mechanisms Conference, Chicago, pp.
37
43
.
9.
Gosselin
,
C. M.
, and
Merlet
,
J.-P.
, 1994, “
On the Direct Kinematics of Planar Parallel Manipulators: Special Architectures and Number of Solutions
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
29
(
8
), pp.
1083
1097
.
10.
Sefrioui
,
J.
, and
Gosselin
,
C. M.
, 1995, “
On the Quadratic Nature of the Singularity Curves of Planar Three-Degree-of-Freedom Parallel Manipulators
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
30
(
4
), pp.
533
551
.
11.
Kong
,
X.
, and
Gosselin
,
C. M.
, 2000,
Determination of the Uniqueness Domains of 3-RPR Planar Parallel Manipulators With Similar Platforms
,” Proceedings of the 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Baltimore, Sept. 10–13.
12.
Bonev
,
I.
,
Zlatanov
,
D.
, and
Gosselin
,
C.
, 2003,
Singularity Analysis of 3-DOF Planar Parallel Mechanisms via Screw Theory
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
125
(
3
), pp.
573
581
.
13.
Wenger
,
P.
,
Chablat
,
D.
, and
Zein
,
M.
, 2007,
Degeneracy Study of the Forward Kinematics of Planar 3-RPR Parallel Manipulators
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
129
(
12
), pp.
1265
1268
.
14.
Merlet
,
J.-P.
, 2006,
Parallel Robots
,
Springer
,
New York
.
15.
Wenger
,
P.
, and
Chablat
,
D.
, 2009, “
Kinematic Analysis of a Class of Analytic Planar 3-RPR Parallel Manipulators
,”
Computational Kinematics: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computational Kinematics
, Springer-Verlag, pp.
43
50
.
16.
Milnor
,
J.
, 1969,
Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint
,
The University Press of Virginia
, Charlottesville.
You do not currently have access to this content.