We consider the problem of selecting among different physics-based computational models of varying, and oftentimes not assessed, fidelity for evaluating the objective and constraint functions in numerical design optimization. Typically, higher-fidelity models are associated with higher computational cost. Therefore, it is desirable to employ them only when necessary. We introduce a relative adequacy framework that aims at determining whether lower-fidelity models (that are typically associated with lower computational cost) can be used in certain areas of the design space as the latter is being explored during the optimization process. The proposed approach is implemented in the mesh adaptive direct search derivative-free optimization algorithm using a trust-region management framework. We demonstrate the link between feasibility and fidelity and the key features of the proposed approach using the design example of a cantilever flexible beam subject to high accelerations.
A Relative Adequacy Framework for Multi-model Management in Design Optimization
Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Mechanical Design. Manuscript received September 7, 2018; final manuscript received June 7, 2019; published online xx xx, xxxx. Assoc. Editor: Nam H. Kim.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Cite Icon Cite
- Search Site
Bayoumy, A. H., and Kokkolaras, M. (June 26, 2019). "A Relative Adequacy Framework for Multi-model Management in Design Optimization." ASME. J. Mech. Des. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044109
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager