Abstract

Engineered products are often optimized based on engineering requirements, user requirements, cost, and performance. This strategy is well suited for most applications, but products designed specifically to improve the lives of users and communities would benefit from an approach that helps engineers optimize a product based also on its social impacts. This paper introduces several optimization problem formulations adapted from multi-stakeholder strategies in the economics and business management literature. Each optimization problem formulation optimizes a product’s social impact according to the ideology and principles inherent to the adapted multi-stakeholder strategy. A case study is presented for a cassava peeling machine that is being developed for farmers in the Brazilian Amazon. Finally, the resulting peeler design configurations and social impacts are discussed to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy.

Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

References

1.
Swinkels
,
R.
,
Romanova
,
E.
, and
Kochkin
,
E.
,
2016
, “
Assessing the Social Impact of Cotton Harvest Mechanization in Uzbekistan
.”
2.
Peiffer
,
E.
, and
MacCarty
,
N.
,
2021
, “
Assessing the Social Impacts of Improved Cookstoves in Peri-Urban and Rural Uganda Using Card Sorting
,”
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, Vol.
85390
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, p.
V03BT03A015
.
3.
Omahne
,
V.
,
Knez
,
M.
, and
Obrecht
,
M.
,
2021
, “
Social Aspects of Electric Vehicles Research–Trends and Relations to Sustainable Development Goals
,”
World Elect. Vehicle J.
,
12
(
1
), p.
15
.
4.
Park
,
S.
,
Rosca
,
E.
, and
Agarwal
,
N.
,
2021
, “
Driving Social Impact at the Bottom of the Pyramid Through the Internet-of-Things Enabled Frugal Innovations
,”
Technovation
,
118
, p.
102381
.
5.
Qin
,
Z.
,
Song
,
Y.
, and
Tian
,
Y.
,
2019
, “
The Impact of Product Design With Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPS) on Consumer Behavior Through Cultural Perceptions: Evidence From the Young Chinese Generation
,”
Sustainability
,
11
(
2
), p.
426
.
6.
Lee
,
S. J.
,
Rees
,
V. W.
,
Yossefy
,
N.
,
Emmons
,
K. M.
, and
Tan
,
A. S.
,
2020
, “
Youth and Young Adult Use of POD-Based Electronic Cigarettes From 2015 to 2019: A Systematic Review
,”
JAMA Pediatrics
,
174
(
7
), pp.
714
720
.
7.
Regan
,
A.
,
2019
, “
‘Smart Farming’in Ireland: A Risk Perception Study With Key Governance Actors
,”
NJAS-Wageningen J. Life Sci.
,
90
, p.
100292
.
8.
Tischner
,
U.
, and
Charter
,
M.
,
2017
, “Sustainable Product Design,”
Sustainable Solutions
,
M.
Charter
, and
U.
Tischner
, eds.,
Routledge
,
Boca Raton, FL
, pp.
118
138
.
9.
Burdge
,
R. J.
,
2004
,
A Community Guide to Social Impact Assessment
, 3rd ed.,
Dog Eared Publications
,
Denver, CO
.
10.
Rainock
,
M.
,
Everett
,
D.
,
Pack
,
A.
,
Dahlin
,
E. C.
, and
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
2018
, “
The Social Impacts of Products: A Review
,”
Impact Assess. Project Appraisal
,
36
(
3
),
230
241
.
11.
McGowan
,
P. J. K.
,
Stewart
,
G. B.
,
Long
,
G.
, and
Grainger
,
M. J.
,
2019
, “
An Imperfect Vision of Indivisibility in the Sustainable Development Goals
,”
Nature Sustainability
,
2
(
1
), pp.
43
45
.
12.
Eweje
,
G.
,
Sajjad
,
A.
,
Nath
,
S. D.
, and
Kobayashi
,
K.
,
2020
, “
Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships: A Catalyst to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals
,”
Marketing Intell. Plann.
,
39
(
2
), pp.
186
212
.
13.
Haywood
,
L. K.
,
Funke
,
N.
,
Audouin
,
M.
,
Musvoto
,
C.
, and
Nahman
,
A.
,
2019
, “
The Sustainable Development Goals in South Africa: Investigating the Need for Multi-stakeholder Partnerships
,”
Development Southern Africa
,
36
(
5
), pp.
555
569
.
14.
Stevenson
,
P. D.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
, and
Dahlin
,
E. C.
,
2020
, “
A Method for Creating Product Social Impact Models of Engineered Products
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
142
(
4
), p.
041101
.
15.
Stevenson
,
P. D.
,
Wood
,
A. E.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
, and
Salmon
,
J. L.
,
2021
, “
Open Research Questions for Incorporating Multi-stakeholder Interests in Engineering for Global Development
,”
ASME 2021 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Virtual Conference
, Paper No. IDETC2021-71835.
16.
Rawls
,
J.
,
1971
,
A Theory of Justice
,
Harvard University Press
,
Cambridge
.
17.
Freeman
,
R. E.
,
Phillips
,
R.
, and
Sisodia
,
R.
,
2020
, “
Tensions in Stakeholder Theory
,”
Business Soc.
,
59
(
2
), pp.
213
231
.
18.
Schaltegger
,
S.
,
Hörisch
,
J.
, and
Freeman
,
R. E.
,
2019
, “
Business Cases for Sustainability: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective
,”
Organ. Environ.
,
32
(
3
), pp.
191
212
.
19.
Wood
,
D. J.
,
Mitchell
,
R. K.
,
Agle
,
B. R.
, and
Bryan
,
L. M.
,
2021
, “
Stakeholder Identification and Salience After 20 Years: Progress, Problems, and Prospects
,”
Business Soc.
,
60
(
1
), pp.
196
245
.
20.
Khandker
,
S. R.
,
Koolwal
,
G. B.
, and
Samad
,
H. A.
,
2010
,
Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices
,
World Bank Publications
,
Washington, DC
.
21.
Stevenson
,
P. D.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
Bryden
,
K. M.
, and
MacCarty
,
N. A.
,
2018
, “
Toward a Universal Social Impact Metric for Engineered Products That Alleviate Poverty
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
140
(
4
), p.
041404
.
22.
Ciroth
,
A.
, and
Eisfeldt
,
F.
,
2016
, “
Psilca-A Product Social Impact Life Cycle Assessment Database
,”
Database Version
,
1
, pp.
1
99
.
23.
Anwar
,
S.
,
Elagroudy
,
S.
,
Razik
,
M. A.
,
Gaber
,
A.
,
Bong
,
C.
, and
Ho
,
W.
,
2018
, “
Optimization of Solid Waste Management in Rural Villages of Developing Countries
,”
Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy.
,
20
(
3
), pp.
489
502
.
24.
Cansino-Loeza
,
B.
, and
Ponce-Ortega
,
J. M.
,
2021
, “
Sustainable Assessment of Water-Energy-Food Nexus at Regional Level Through a Multi-stakeholder Optimization Approach
,”
J. Clean. Prod.
,
290
, p.
125194
.
25.
Pitangueira
,
A. M.
,
Tonella
,
P.
,
Susi
,
A.
,
Maciel
,
R. S.
, and
Barros
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Risk-Aware Multi-stakeholder Next Release Planning Using Multi-Objective Optimization
,”
Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality: 22nd International Working Conference, REFSQ 2016
,
Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Mar. 14–17
,
Springer
, pp.
3
18
.
26.
Lazzarini
,
S. G.
,
2018
, “
The Measurement of Social Impact and Opportunities for Research in Business Administration
,”
RAUSP Manage. J.
,
53
, pp.
134
137
.
27.
Pack
,
A. T.
,
Rose Phipps
,
E.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
, and
Dahlin
,
E. C.
,
2020
, “
Social Impact in Product Design, An Exploration of Current Industry Practices
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
142
(
7
), p.
071702
.
28.
Jana
,
A.
,
Basu
,
R.
, and
Mukherjee
,
C.
,
2020
, “
A Game Theoretic Approach to Optimize Multi-stakeholder Utilities for Land Acquisition Negotiations With Informality
,”
Socio-Economic Plann. Sci.
,
69
, p.
100717
.
29.
Osborne
,
M. J.
,
2004
,
An Introduction to Game Theory
, Vol.
3
,
Oxford University Press
,
New York
.
30.
Papageorgiou
,
E.
,
Eres
,
M. H.
, and
Scanlan
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Value Modelling for Multi-stakeholder and Multi-objective Optimisation in Engineering Design
,”
J. Eng. Design
,
27
(
10
), pp.
697
724
.
31.
Kulkarni
,
A. U.
,
Wernz
,
C.
, and
Salado
,
A.
,
2021
, “
Coordination of Verification Activities With Incentives: A Two-Firm Model
,”
Res. Eng. Design
,
32
(
1
), pp.
31
47
.
32.
Chremos
,
I. V.
,
Beaver
,
L. E.
, and
Malikopoulos
,
A. A.
,
2020
, “
A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Social Impact of Connected and Automated Vehicles
,”
2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)
,
Rhodes, Greece
,
Sept. 20–23
,
IEEE
, pp.
1
6
.
33.
Charan
,
P.
, and
Murty
,
L.
,
2018
, “
Secondary Stakeholder Pressures and Organizational Adoption of Sustainable Operations Practices: The Mediating Role of Primary Stakeholders
,”
Business Strat. Environ.
,
27
(
7
), pp.
910
923
.
34.
Fernández-Torres
,
M. J.
,
Hildebrandt
,
D.
,
Sempuga
,
B. C.
, and
Caballero
,
J. A.
,
2020
, “
Integrating Environmental Concerns Into the Teaching of Mathematical Optimization
,”
Education Chem. Eng.
,
32
, pp.
40
49
.
35.
Topcu
,
T. G.
, and
Mesmer
,
B. L.
,
2018
, “
Incorporating End-User Models and Associated Uncertainties to Investigate Multiple Stakeholder Preferences in System Design
,”
Res. Eng. Design
,
29
(
3
), pp.
411
431
.
36.
Peiffer
,
E.
,
Burleson
,
G.
, and
Machado
,
M.
,
2019
, “
2019 State of Engineering for Global Development: United States and Canada
.”
37.
Burton
,
B. K.
, and
Dunn
,
C. P.
,
1996
, “
Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory
,”
Business Ethics Q.
,
6
(
2
), pp.
133
147
.
38.
Friedman
,
M.
,
2007
, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits,”
Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance
,
W. C.
Zimmerli
,
M.
Holzinger
, and
K.
Richter
, eds.,
Springer
,
Berlin/Heidelberg
, pp.
173
178
.
39.
Weber
,
M.
,
2008
, “
The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Company-Level Measurement Approach for CSR
,”
Eur. Manage. J.
,
26
(
4
), pp.
247
261
.
40.
Freeman
,
R. E.
,
Harrison
,
J.
, and
Wicks
,
A.
,
2007
,
Managing for Stakeholders
,
New Haven
,
London
.
41.
Sandhu-Rojon
,
R.
,
2003
, “
Selecting Indicators for Impact Evaluation
,”
UNDP, viewed
,
7
, p.
2004
.
42.
Stevenson
,
P. D.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
Dahlin
,
E. C.
, and
Salmon
,
J. L.
,
2023
, “
Creating Predictive Social Impact Models of Engineered Products Using Synthetic Populations
,”
Res. Eng. Design
,
34
(
4
), pp.
461
476
.
43.
Sen
,
A.
,
1994
, “
Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement
.”
44.
Alkire
,
S.
, and
Santos
,
M. E.
,
2010
, “
Acute Multidimensional Poverty: A New Index for Developing Countries
,” United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report Office Background Paper (2010/11).
45.
Pahl
,
G.
,
Beitz
,
W.
,
Feldhusen
,
J.
, and
Grote
,
K.
,
1988
,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
,
The Design Council & Translator
,
London
.
46.
Ulrich
,
K.
,
Eppinger
,
S.
, and
Yang
,
M. C.
,
2020
,
Product Design and Development
, 7th ed.,
McGraw Hill Education
,
New York
.
47.
Mattson
,
C. A.
, and
Sorensen
,
C. D.
,
2019
,
Product Development: Principles and Tools for Creating Desirable and Transferable Designs
,
Springer Nature
,
Cham
.
48.
Friedman
,
M.
,
2002
,
Capitalism and Freedom: Fortieth Anniversary Edition
,
University of Chicago Press
,
Chicago, IL
.
49.
Taiebat
,
M.
,
Brown
,
A. L.
,
Safford
,
H. R.
,
Qu
,
S.
, and
Xu
,
M.
,
2018
, “
A Review on Energy, Environmental, and Sustainability Implications of Connected and Automated Vehicles
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
52
(
20
), pp.
11449
11465
.
50.
Minnesota Population Center
,
2018
. “
Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, International: Version 7.1 [dataset]
,” Technical Report,
IPUMS
,
Minneapolis, MN
.
51.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE)
,
2017
, “
Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares 2017-2018 : Análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil / IBGE, Coordenação de Trabalho e Rendimento
,” Technical Report,
IBGE
.
52.
IBGE – Levantamento Sistemático da Produção Agrícola
,” Levantamento Sistemático da Produção Agrícola Tabela 6588 - Série histórica da estimativa anual da área plantada, área colhida, produção e rendimento médio dos produtos das lavouras.
You do not currently have access to this content.