Creativity is universally acknowledged as an important attribute of successful engineering design, but individual attributes and preferences can influence whether creative ideas come to fruition during the design process. However, few studies have explored the factors that can predict creative concept generation and selection in engineering design education. Thus, the current study was developed to provide an empirical understanding of how student designers' preferences for creativity predicts their ability to generate or select creative design alternatives during the concept screening process above and beyond the effects of personality through an empirical study with 178 engineering students. The factors explored included the Big 5 factors of personality, the preferences for creativity scale (PCS), and the novelty and quality of ideas generated and screened. The results show that the openness personality trait can predict the novelty of generated ideas as well as the novelty and quality of selected ideas during the concept screening process and that the creative confidence and preference factor of the PCS can predict the novelty of generated ideas and the novelty and quality of selected ideas during the concept screening process beyond the Big 5 factors of personality. A similar finding was obtained for the risk tolerance factor of the PCS. These findings demonstrate the importance of an individual's attitude toward risk and their creative confidence in the generation and selection of ideas in engineering education and provide a foundation for future research geared at building student innovation capacities.

References

References
1.
Toh
,
C. A.
,
Miller
,
S. R.
, and
Kremer
,
G. E.
,
2014
, “
The Impact of Team-Based Product Dissection on Design Novelty
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
4
), p.
041004
.
2.
Li
,
Y.
,
Wang
,
J.
,
Li
,
X.
, and
Zhao
,
W.
,
2007
, “
Design Creativity in Product Innovation
,”
Int. J. Manuf. Technol.
,
33
(
3–4
), pp.
213
222
.
3.
Hsiao
,
S.
, and
Chou
,
J.
,
2004
, “
A Creativity-Based Design Process for Innovative Product Design
,”
Int. J. Ind. Ergonom.
,
34
(
5
), pp.
421
443
.
4.
Ayag
,
Z.
, and
Ozdemir
,
R. G.
,
2009
, “
A Hybrid Approach to Concept Selection Through Fuzzy Analytic Network Process
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
,
56
(
1
), pp.
368
379
.
5.
Dylla
,
N.
,
1991
,
Thinking Methods and Procedures in Mechanical Design
,
Technical University of Munich
,
Munich, Germany
.
6.
McAloone
,
T. C.
,
2007
, “
A Competence-Based Approach to Sustainable Innovation Teaching: Experiences Within a New Engineering Program
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
129
(
7
), pp.
769
778
.
7.
Kershaw
,
T. C.
,
Peterson
,
R. L.
,
McCarthy
,
M. A.
,
Young
,
A. P.
,
Seepersad
,
C. C.
,
Williams
,
P. T.
,
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
,
Bhowmick
,
S.
, 2015, “
A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Examination of the Development of Innovation Capability in Undergraduate Engineering Students
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2015-47650.
8.
West
,
R. E.
,
Tateishi
,
I.
,
Wright
,
G. A.
, and
Fonoimoana
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Innovation 101: Promoting Undergraduate Innovation Through a Two-Day Boot Camp
,”
Creativity Res. J.
,
24
(
2–3
), pp.
243
251
.
9.
Felder
,
R. M.
,
1987
, “
On Creating Creative Engineers
,”
Eng. Educ.
,
77
(
4
), pp.
222
227
.http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/Creative_Engineers.pdf
10.
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
Markman
,
A. B.
, and
Wood
,
K. L.
,
2012
, “
Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem Re-Representation
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
134
(
4
), p.
041009
.
11.
Daly
,
S. R.
,
Yilmaz
,
S.
,
Christian
,
J. L.
,
Seifert
,
C. M.
, and
Gonzalez
,
R.
,
2012
, “
Design Heuristics in Engineering Concept Generation
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
101
(
4
), pp.
601
629
.
12.
Van Aken
,
J.
,
2004
, “
Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules
,”
J. Manage. Stud.
,
41
(
2
), pp.
219
246
.
13.
Torrance
,
E. P.
, and
Goff
,
K.
,
1989
, “
A Quiet Revolution
,”
J. Creative Behav.
,
23
(
2
), pp.
136
145
.
14.
Torrance
,
E. P.
,
1999
,
Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: Norms and Technical Manual
,
Scholastic Testing Services
,
Beaconville, IL
.
15.
Guilford
,
J. P.
,
1950
, “
Creativity
,”
Am. Psychol.
,
5
(
9
), pp.
444
454
.
16.
Wallach
,
M. A.
, and
Kogan
,
N.
,
1965
,
Models of Thinking in Young Children
,
Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
,
New York
.
17.
Mednick
,
S. A.
,
1962
, “
The Associative Basis of the Creative Process
,”
Psychol. Rev.
,
69
(
3
), pp.
220
232
.
18.
Gough
,
H. G.
,
1992
, “
Assessment of Creative Potential in Psychology and the Development of a Creative Temperament Scale for the CPI
,”
Advances in Psychological Assessment
,
J. C.
Rosen
and
P.
McReynolds
, eds., Vol.
8
,
Plenum
,
New York
, pp.
225
257
.
19.
Johnson
,
D. L.
,
1979
,
The Creativity Checklist
,
Stoelting
,
Wood Dale, IL
.
20.
Kirschenbaum
,
R. J.
,
1989
,
Understanding the Creative Activity of Students
,
Creative Learning Press
,
Mansfield, CT
.
21.
Kumar
,
V. K.
,
Kemmler
,
D.
, and
Holman
,
E. R.
,
1997
, “
The Creativity Styles Questionnaire- Revised
,”
Creativity Res. J.
,
10
(
1
), pp.
51
58
.
22.
Williams
,
F. E.
,
1980
,
The Creativity Assessment Packet
,
Psychologists and Educators Inc
,
Chesterfield, MO
.
23.
Byrd
,
R. E.
,
1986
,
Creativity and Risk-Taking
,
Pfeiffer International Publishers
,
San Diego, CA
.
24.
Kirton
,
M. J.
,
1989
, “
Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem Solving
,”
J. Appl. Psychol.
,
61
(
5
), p.
622
.
25.
Bassadur
,
M.
, and
Hausdorf
, P. A.
,
1996
, “
Measuring Divergent Thinking Attitudes Related to Creative Problem Solving and Innovation Management
,”
Creativity Res. J.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
21
32
.
26.
Guilford
,
J. P.
,
1967
,
The Nature of Human Intelligence
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
27.
MacKinnon
,
D. W.
,
1977
, “
The Nature and Nurture of the Creative Talent
,”
Am. Psychol.
,
17
(
7
), pp.
484
495
.
28.
Luchins
,
A. S.
, and
Luchins
,
E. H.
,
1959
,
Rigidity of Behavior: A Variational Approach to the Effect of Einstellung
,
University of Oregon
,
Eugene, OR
.
29.
Osborn
,
A. F.
,
1963
,
Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking
,
2nd ed.
,
Scribeners and Sons
,
New York
.
30.
Parnes
,
S. J.
,
Noller
,
R. B.
, and
Biondi
,
A. M.
,
1977
,
Guide to Creative Action
,
Scribner's
,
New York
.
31.
De Dreu
,
C. K.
, and
West
,
M. A.
,
2001
, “
Minority Dissent and Team Innovation: The Importance of Participation in Decision Making
,”
J. Appl. Psychol.
,
86
(
6
), pp.
1191
1201
.
32.
Garrett
,
R. M.
,
1987
, “
Issues in Science Education: Problem-Solving, Creativity, and Originality
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
,
9
(
2
), pp.
125
137
.
33.
Silver
,
E. A.
,
1997
, “
Fostering Creativity Through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing
,”
Int. J. Math. Educ.
,
29
(
3
), pp.
75
80
.
34.
Berglund
,
H.
, and
Wennberg
,
K.
,
2006
, “
Creativity Among Entrepreneurship Students: Comparing Engineering and Business Education
,”
Int. J. Continuing Eng. Educ. Lifelong Learn.
,
16
(
5
), pp.
366
379
.
35.
Baer
,
M.
,
Oldham
,
G. R.
,
Jacobsohn
,
G. C.
, and
Hollingshead
,
A. B.
,
2007
, “
The Personality Composition of Teams and Creativity: The Moderating Role of Team Creative Confidence
,”
J. Creat. Behav.
,
42
(
4
), pp.
255
282
.
36.
Daly
,
S. R.
,
Mosyjowski
,
E. A.
, and
Seifert
,
C. M.
,
2014
, “
Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
103
(
3
), pp.
417
449
.
37.
Mumford
,
M. D.
,
2003
, “
Where Have We Been, Where Are We Going? Taking Stock in Creativity Research
,”
Creativity Res. J.
,
15
(
2
), pp.
107
120
.
38.
Sio
,
U. N.
,
Kotovsky
,
K.
, and
Cagan
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Fixation or Inspiration? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Role of Examples on Design Processes
,”
Des. Stud.
,
39
, pp.
70
99
.
39.
Mohanani
,
R.
,
Ralph
,
P.
, and
Shreeve
,
B.
,
2014
, “
Requirements Fixation
,”
International Conference on Software Engineering
,
Hyderabad, India
,
May 31–June 7
, pp.
895
906
.
40.
Agogué
,
M.
,
Kazakçi
,
A.
,
Hatchuel
,
A.
,
Masson
,
P. L.
,
Weil
,
B.
,
Poirel
,
N.
, and
Cassotti
,
M.
,
2014
, “
The Impact of Type of Examples on Originality: Explaining Fixation and Stimulation Effects
,”
J. Creative Behav.
,
48
(
1
), pp.
1
12
.
41.
Viswanathan
,
V. K.
, and
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
2013
, “
Design Fixation and Its Mitigation: A Study on the Role of Expertise
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
135
(
5
), p.
051008
.
42.
Toh
,
C. A.
,
Miller
,
S. R.
, and
Kremer
,
G. E.
,
2013
, “
The Role of Personality and Team-Based Product Dissection on Fixation Effects
,”
Adv. Eng. Educ.
,
3
(
4
), pp.
1
23
.https://advances.asee.org/publication/the-role-of-personality-and-team-based-product-dissection-on-fixation-effects/
43.
Youmans
,
R. J.
, and
Arciszewski
,
T.
,
2012
, “
Design Fixation: A Cloak of Many Colors
,”
The Design Computing and Cognition
, College Station, TX, June 7–9, pp. 115–129.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312800570_Design_Fixation_A_Cloak_of_Many_Colors
44.
Wilde
,
D. J.
,
1993
, “
Changes Among ASEE Creativity Workshop Participants
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
82
(
3
), pp.
167
170
.
45.
Shah
,
J.
,
Vargas-Hernandez
,
N.
, and
Smith
,
S. M.
,
2003
, “
Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness
,”
Des. Stud.
,
24
(
2
), pp.
111
124
.
46.
Oman
,
S. K.
,
Tumer
,
I. Y.
,
Wood
,
K.
, and
Seepersad
,
C.
,
2013
, “
A Comparison of Creativity and Innovation Metrics and Sample Validation Through In-Class Design Projects
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
24
(
1
), pp.
65
92
.
47.
Sarkar
,
P.
, and
Chakrabarti
,
A.
,
2014
, “
Ideas Generated in Conceptual Design and Their Effects on Creativity
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
25
(
3
), pp.
185
201
.
48.
Sivaloganathan
,
S.
, and
King
,
A. M.
,
1999
, “
Development of a Methodology for Concept Selection in Flexible Design Strategies
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
10
(
4
), pp.
329
349
.
49.
Okudan
,
G. E.
, and
Tauhid
,
S.
,
2008
, “
Concept Selection Methods—A Literature Review From 1980 to 2008
,”
Int. J. Des. Eng.
,
1
(
3
), pp.
243
277
.
50.
Pugh
,
S.
,
1996
,
Creating Innovative Products Using Total Design
,
Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co.
,
Boston, MA
.
51.
Miller
,
G. A.
,
1956
, “
The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information
,”
Psychol. Rev.
,
63
(
2
), pp.
81
97
.
52.
Baddeley
,
A.
,
2003
, “
Working Memory: Looking Back and Looking Forward
,”
Nat. Rev.
,
4
(
10
), pp.
829
839
.
53.
Marsh
,
E. R.
,
Slocum
,
A. H.
, and
Otto
,
K. N.
,
1993
,
Hierarchical Decision Making in Machine Design
,
MIT Precision Engineering Research Center
, Cambridge, MA.
54.
Pahl
,
G.
, and
Beitz
,
W.
,
1984
,
Engineering Design
,
The Design Council
,
London
, pp.
119
138
.
55.
Pugh
,
S.
,
1991
,
Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering
,
Addison-Wesley
,
Workingham, UK
.
56.
Salonen
,
M.
, and
Perttula
,
M.
,
2005
, “
Utilization of Concept Selection Methods: A Survey of Finnish Industry
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2005-85047.
57.
Ford
,
J. D.
, and
Form
,
L. W.
,
2002
, “
Resistance and the Background Conversations to Change
,”
J. Organ. Change
,
15
(
2
), pp.
105
121
.
58.
Dym
,
C. L.
,
Wood
,
W. H.
, and
Scott
,
M. J.
,
2002
, “
Rank Ordering Engineering Designs: Pairwise Comparison Charts and Borda Counts
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
13(4)
, pp.
236
242
.
59.
Ulrich
,
K. T.
,
Eppinger
,
S. D.
, and
Goyal
,
A.
,
2011
,
Product Design and Development
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
60.
Busby
,
J. S.
,
2001
, “
Practices in Design Concept Selection as Distributed Cognition
,”
Cognition, Technol. Work
,
3
(
3
), pp.
140
149
.
61.
Bearman
,
C.
,
Ormerod
,
T. C.
,
Ball
,
L. J.
, and
Deptula
,
D.
,
2011
, “
Explaining Away the Negative Effects of Evaluation on Analogical Transfer: The Petils of Premature Evaluation
,”
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
,
64
(
5
), pp.
942
959
.
62.
Nikander
,
J. B.
,
Liikkanen
,
L. A.
, and
Laakso
,
M.
, “
The Preference Effect in Design Concept Evaluation
,”
Des. Stud.
,
35
(
5
), pp.
473
499
.
63.
Kruger
,
C.
, and
Cross
,
N.
,
2006
, “
Solution Dtriven Versus Problem Driven Design: Strategies and Outcomes
,”
Des. Stud.
,
27
(
5
), pp.
527
548
.
64.
De Martino
,
B.
,
Kumaran
,
D.
,
Seymour
,
B.
, and
Dolan
,
R. J.
,
2006
, “
Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human Brain
,”
Science
,
313
(
5787
), pp.
684
687
.
65.
Onarheim
,
B.
, and
Christensen
,
B. T.
,
2012
, “
Distributed Idea Screening in Stage-Gate Development Processes
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
23
(
9
), pp.
660
673
.
66.
Kruglanski
,
A. W.
, and
Webster
,
D. M.
,
1996
, “
Motivated Closing of the Mind: ‘Seizing’ and ‘Freezing
,’”
Psychol. Rev.
,
103
(
2
), pp.
263
283
.
67.
Amabile
,
T.
,
1996
,
Creativity in Context. Boulder
,
Westview Press
,
Boulder, CO
.
68.
Kichuk
,
S.
, and
Wiesner
,
W.
,
1998
, “
The Big Five Personality Factors and Team Performance: Implications for Selecting Successful Product Design Teams
,”
J. Eng. Technol. Manage.
,
14
(
3–4
), pp.
195
221
.
69.
Hammond
,
J. S.
,
Keeney
,
R. L.
, and
Raiffa
,
H.
,
1998
, “
The Hidden Traps in Decision Making
,”
Harvard Bus. Rev.
,
76
(
5
), pp.
47
58
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12948100_The_Hidden_Traps_in_Decision_Making
70.
Ross
,
M.
, and
Sicoly
,
F.
,
1979
, “
Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution
,”
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
,
3
(
1
), pp.
322
336
.https://faculty.washington.edu/jmiyamot/p466/pprs/ross%20egocentric%20bias.pdf
71.
Roese
,
N. J.
, and
Olson
,
J. M.
,
1994
, “
Attitude Importance as a Function of Repeated Attitude Expression
,”
J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.
,
30
(
1
), pp.
39
51
.
72.
Wilde
,
D. J.
,
1997
, “
Using Student Preferences to Guide Design Team Composition
,“
Design Engineering Technical Conferences
, Sacramento, CA, Sept. 14–17, pp.
1
6
.http://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/~paasch/classes/me382/3890.PDF
73.
Somech
,
A.
, and
Drach-Zahavy
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Translating Team Creativity to Innovation Implementation: The Role of Team Composition and Climate for Innovation
,”
J. Manage.
,
39
(
3
), pp.
684
708
.
74.
Costa
,
P.
, and
McCrea
,
R.
,
1992
,
Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)
,
Psychological Assessment Resources
,
Odessa, FL
.
75.
Feist
,
G. J.
,
2006
, “
The Influence of Personality on Artistic and Scientific Creativity
,”
Handbook of Creativity
,
6th ed.
,
R. J.
Sternberg
, ed.,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
, pp.
273
296
.
76.
Batey
,
M.
, and
Furnham
,
A.
,
2006
, “
Creativity, intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature
,”
Genetic, Soc., General Psychol. Monographs
,
132
(
4
), pp.
355
4329
.
77.
Stafford
,
L.
,
Ng
,
W.
,
Moore
,
R.
, and
Bard
,
K.
,
2010
, “
Bolder, Happier, Smarter: The Role of Extraversion in Positive Mood and Cognition
,”
Pers. Individ. Differ.
,
48
(
7
), pp.
827
832
.
78.
Feist
,
G. J.
,
1998
, “
A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity
,”
Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev.
,
2
(
4
), pp.
290
309
.
79.
Hoff
,
E.
,
Carlsson
,
I.
, and
Smith
,
G.
,
2012
,
Handbook of Organizational Creativity
,
Elsevier
,
London
.
80.
Silvia
,
P. J.
,
Kaufman
,
J. C.
,
Reiter-Palmon
,
R.
, and
Wigert
,
B.
,
2011
, “
Cantankerous Creativity: Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness and the HEXACO Structure of Creative Achievement
,”
Pers. Individ. Differ.
,
51
(
5
), pp.
687
689
.
81.
Steel
,
G. D.
,
Rinne
,
T.
,
Fairweather
, J.
,
2012
, “
Personality, Nations, and Innovation: Relationships Between Personality Traits and National Innovation Scores
,”
Cross-Cultural Res.: J. Comp. Soc. Sci.
,
46
(
1
), pp.
3
30
.
82.
Xu
,
H.
, and
Brucks
,
M.
,
2011
, “
Are Neurotics Really More Creative? Neuroticism's Interaction With Mortality Salience in Determining Creative Interest
,”
Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol.
,
33
(
1
), pp.
88
99
.
83.
McCrae
,
R.
,
1987
, “
Creativity, Divergent Thinking, and Openness to Experience
,”
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
,
52
(
6
), pp.
1258
1275
.
84.
Silvia
,
P. J.
,
Nusbaum
,
E. C.
,
Berg
,
C.
,
Martin
,
C.
, and
O'Connor
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Openness to Experience, Plasticity, and Creativity: Exploring Lower-Order, High-Order, and Interactive Effects
,”
J. Res. Pers.
,
43
(
6
), pp.
1087
1090
.
85.
Kaufman
,
J. C.
, and
Baer
,
J.
,
2004
, “
Sure, I'm Creative—But Not in Mathematics! Self-Reported Creativity in Diverse Domains
,”
Empirical Stud. Arts
,
22
(
2
), pp.
143
155
.
86.
Toh
,
C. A.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2016
, “
Creativity in Design Teams: The Influence of Personality Traits and Risk Attitudes on Creative Concept Selection
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
27
(
1
), pp.
73
89
.
87.
Toh
,
C.
, and
Miller
,
S.
,
2016
, “
The Preferences for Creativity Scale (PCS): Identifying the Underlying Constructs of Creative Concept Selection
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2016-60414.
88.
Perry-Smith
,
J. E.
,
2006
, “
Social Yet Creative: The Role of Social Relationships in Facilitating Individual Creativity
,”
Acad. Manage. J.
,
49
(
1
), pp.
85
101
.
89.
Hoffman
,
L. R.
,
Harburg
,
E.
, and
Maier
,
N. R.
,
1962
, “
Differences and Disagreement as Factors in Creative Group Problem Solving
,”
J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol.
,
64
(
3
), p.
206
.
90.
Sternberg
,
R. J.
,
O'Hara
,
L. A.
, and
Lubart
,
T. I.
,
1997
, “
Creativity as an Investment
,”
California Manage. Rev.
,
40
(
1
), pp.
8
21
.
91.
Paulus
,
P. B.
,
2000
, “
Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-Generating Groups
,”
Appl. Psychol.: An Int. Rev.
,
49
(
2
), pp.
237
262
.
92.
Rokeach
,
M.
,
1973
,
The Nature of Human Values
,
Free Press
,
New York
.
93.
Heath
,
C.
, and
Tversky
,
A.
,
1991
, “
Preferences and Beliefs: Ambiguity and Competence in Choice Under Uncertainty
,”
J. Risk Uncertainty
,
2
, pp.
5
35
.
94.
Kleiman
,
P.
,
2008
, “
Towards Transformation: Conceptions of Creativity in Higher Education
,”
Innovations Educ. Training Int.
,
45
(
3
), pp.
209
217
.
95.
Sitkin
,
S. B.
, and
Pablo
,
A. L.
,
1992
, “
Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior
,”
Acad. Manage. Rev.
,
17
(
1
), pp.
9
38
.
96.
Thaler
,
R. H.
, and
Johnson
,
E. J.
,
1990
, “
Gambling With the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice
,”
Manage. Sci.
,
36
(
6
), pp.
643
660
.
97.
Phelan
,
S.
, and
Young
,
A. M.
,
2003
, “
Understanding Creativity in the Workplace: An Examination of Individual Styles and Training in Relation to Creative Confidence and Creative Self-Leadership
,”
J. Creative Behav.
,
37
(
4
), pp.
266
281
.
98.
Rietzschel
,
E.
,
Nijstad
,
B. A.
, and
Stroebe
,
W.
,
2010
, “
The Selection of Creative Ideas After Individual Idea Generation: Choosing Between Creativity and Impact
,”
Br. J. Psychol.
,
101
(
1
), pp.
47
68
.
99.
Andrews
,
J.
, and
Smith
,
D. C.
,
1996
, “
In Search of the Marketing Imagination: Factors Affecting the Creativity of Marketing Programs for Mature Products
,”
J. Mark. Res.
,
33
(
2
), pp.
174
187
.
100.
Heininger
,
K.
,
Chen
,
H.-C.
,
Jablokow
,
K.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2018
, “
How Engineering Design Students' Creative Preferences and Cognitive Styles Impact Their Concept Generation and Screening
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2018-85942.
101.
Donnellan
,
M. B.
,
Oswald
,
F. L.
,
Baird
,
B. M.
, and
Lucas
,
R. E.
,
2006
, “
The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-Yet-Effective Measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality
,”
Psychol. Assess.
,
18
(
2
), pp.
192
203
.
102.
Goldberg
,
L. R.
,
1999
, “
A Broad-Bandwidth, Public-Domain, Personality Inventory Measuring the Lower-Level Facets of Serveral Five-Factor Models
,”
Personality Psychology in Europe
, Vol.
7
,
Tilburg University Press
,
Tilburg, The Netherlands
, pp.
7
28
.
103.
Toh
,
C. A.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2015
, “
How Engineering Teams Select Design Concepts: A View Through the Lens of Creativity
,”
Des. Stud.
,
38
(
1
), pp.
111
138
.
104.
Kurdrowitz
,
B.
, and
Dippo
,
C.
,
2013
, “
Getting to the Novel Ideas: Exploring the Alternative Uses Test of Divergent Thinking
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2013-13262.
105.
Beaty
,
R. E.
, and
Silvia
,
P. J.
,
2012
, “
Why Do Ideas Get More Creative Across Time? An Executive Interpretation of the Serial Order Effect in Divergent Thinking Tasks
,”
Psychol. Aesthetics, Creativity, Arts
,
6
(
4
), pp.
309
319
.
106.
Parnes
,
S. J.
,
1961
, “
Effects of Extended Effort in Creative Problem Solving
,”
J. Educ. Psychol.
,
52
(
3
), pp.
117
122
.
107.
Rietzchel
,
E. F.
,
Nijstad
,
B. A.
, and
Stroebe
,
W.
,
2006
, “
Productivity Is Not Enough: A Comparison of Interactive and Nominal Groups in Idea Generation and Selection
,”
J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.
,
42
(
2
), pp.
244
251
.
108.
Chrysikou
,
E. G.
, and
Weisberg
,
R. W.
,
2005
, “
Following in the Wrong Footsteps: Fixation Effects of Pictorial Examples in a Design Problem-Solving Task
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.
,
31
(
5
), pp.
1134
11448
.
109.
Kelley
,
T.
, and
Littman
,
J.
,
2001
,
The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity From IDEO, America's Leading Design Firm
,
Currency/Doubleday
,
New York
.
110.
Sarkar
,
P.
, and
Chakrabarti
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Assessing Design Creativity
,”
Des. Stud.
,
32
(
4
), pp.
348
383
.
111.
Weisberg
,
R. W.
,
1993
,
From Creativity—Beyond the Myth of Genius
,
WH Freeman and Company
, London.
112.
Toh
,
C. A.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2014
, “
The Impact of Example Modality and Physical Interactions on Design Creativity
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
9
), p. 091004.
113.
Johnson
,
J.
,
2014
, “
Measuring Thirty Facets of the Five Factor Model With a 120-Item Public Domain Inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120
,”
J. Res. Pers.
,
51
(
1
), pp.
78
89
.
114.
Barrick
,
M. R.
, and
Mount
,
M. K.
,
1991
, “
The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis
,”
Pers. Psychol.
,
44
(
1
), pp.
1
26
.
115.
Nicholson
,
N.
,
Soane
,
E.
,
Fenton-O'Creevy
,
M.
, and
Willman
,
P.
,
2005
, “
Personality and Domain-Specific Risk Taking
,”
J. Risk Res.
,
8
(
2
), pp.
157
176
.
116.
Boyle
,
P. A.
,
Yu
,
L.
,
Buchman
,
A. S.
, and
Bennett
,
D. A.
,
2012
, “
Risk Aversion Is Associated With Decision Making Among Community-Based Older Persons
,”
Front. Psychol.
,
3
, p. 205.
117.
Boyle
,
P. A.
,
Yu
,
L.
,
Buchman
,
A. S.
,
Laibson
,
D. I.
, and
Bennett
,
D. A.
,
2011
, “
Cognitive Function Is Associated With Risk Aversion in Community-Based Older Persons
,”
BMS Geriatrics
,
11
(
53
), p.
53
.
118.
Han
,
S. D.
,
Boyle
,
P. A.
,
Arfanakis
,
K.
,
Fleischman
,
D. A.
,
Yu
,
L.
,
Edmonds
,
E. C.
, and
Bennett
,
D. A.
,
2012
, “
Neural Intrinsic Connectivity Networks Associated With Risk Aversion in Old Age
,”
Behav. Brain Res.
,
227
(
1
), pp.
233
240
.
119.
Jeannette
,
Y.
, and
Nelson
,
B. A.
,
2009
, “
Refined Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness
,”
Des. Stud.
,
30
(
6
), pp.
737
743
.
You do not currently have access to this content.