Consumers often use a product's visual design as a mental shortcut to judge its unobservable attributes. Mental associations between visual design and unobservable attributes aid consumers in their judgments, and hypothetically reduce consumers' mental load. This paper describes a study that shows the possibility of quickly creating an association in subjects' minds between a holistic visual cue of a product—its body shape—and the general idea of “environmentally friendly” versus “not environmentally friendly,” a typically unobservable attribute. In this study, products' actual environmental friendliness was not measured. Subjects completed an association-building task, in which they developed mental associations between a product's visual cues and its “environmental friendliness” rating, an arbitrarily predetermined rating the authors supplied. The body shape was successfully used as a cue to subliminally communicate to subjects the product's “environmental friendliness.” As a comparison, an individual feature of the product was also used to cue; however, that was unsuccessful. An eye-tracking device was used to identify where subjects were focusing their eyes and for how long. In both the association-building task and a testing task that followed, subjects spent a greater percentage of time looking at the product's cued areas (the body and the selected feature). But during the testing task, subjects spent an even higher percentage of their time looking at the cued areas than they did during the association-building task. This indicates that mental associations, or cues, work to distribute mental load more efficiently.

References

References
1.
Reid
,
T. N.
,
Gonzalez
,
R. D.
, and
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
,
2010
, “
Quantification of Perceived Environmental Friendliness for Vehicle Silhouette Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
132
(
10
), p.
101010
.
2.
MacDonald
,
E. F.
,
Gonzalez
,
R.
, and
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
,
2009
, “
The Construction of Preferences for Crux and Sentinel Product Attributes
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
20
(
6
), pp.
609
626
.
3.
Gigerenzer
,
G.
,
2004
, “
Fast and Frugal Heuristics: The Tools of Bounded Rationality
,”
Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making
,
D. J.
Koehler
and
N.
Harvey
, eds.,
Oxford
,
UK
.
4.
Du
,
P.
, and
MacDonald
,
E.
,
2015
, “
Products' Shared Visual Features Do Not Cancel in Consumer Decisions
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
7
), p.
071409
.
5.
She
,
J. J.
, and
MacDonald
,
E.
,
2014
, “
Priming Designers to Communicate Sustainability
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
1
), p. 011001.
6.
MacDonald
,
E. F.
, and
She
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Seven Cognitive Concepts for Successful Eco-Design
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
92
, pp.
23
36
.
7.
Berkowitz
,
M.
,
1987
, “
Product Shape as a Design Innovation Strategy
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
,
4
(
4
), pp.
274
283
.
8.
Chandler
,
J. J.
,
Reinhard
,
D.
, and
Schwarz
,
N.
,
2012
, “
To Judge a Book by Its Weight You Need to Know Its Content: Knowledge Moderates the Use of Embodied Cues
,”
J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.
,
48
(
4
), pp.
948
952
.
9.
Wänke
,
M.
,
Bless
,
H.
, and
Schwarz
,
N.
,
1998
, “
Context Effects in Product Line Extensions: Context is Not Destiny
,”
J. Consumer Psychol.
,
7
(
4
), pp.
299
322
.
10.
Dawar
,
N.
, and
Parker
,
P.
,
1994
, “
Marketing Universals: Consumers' Use of Brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer Reputation as Signals of Product Quality
,”
J. Mark.
,
58
(
2
), pp.
81
95
.
11.
Kirmani
,
A.
,
1990
, “
The Effect of Perceived Advertising Costs on Brand Perceptions
,”
J. Consumer Res.
,
17
(
2
), pp.
160
171
.
12.
Brown
,
C. L.
, and
Carpenter
,
G. S.
,
2000
, “
Why is the Trivial Important? A Reasons-Based Account for the Effects of Trivial Attributes on Choice
,”
J. Consumer Res.
,
26
(
4
), pp.
372
385
.
13.
Simonson
,
I.
,
Carmon
,
Z.
, and
O'curry
,
S.
,
1994
, “
Experimental Evidence on the Negative Effect of Product Features and Sales Promotions on Brand Choice
,”
Mark. Sci.
,
13
(
1
), pp.
23
40
.
14.
Carpenter
,
G. S.
,
Glazer
,
R.
, and
Nakamoto
,
K.
,
1994
, “
Meaningful Brands From Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes
,”
J. Mark. Res.
,
31
(
3
), pp.
339
350
.
15.
Tseng
,
I.
,
Cagan
,
J.
,
Kotovsky
,
K.
, and
Wood
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Form Function Fidelity
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
135
(
1
), p.
011006
.
16.
Lai
,
H. H.
,
Chang
,
Y. M.
, and
Chang
,
H. C.
,
2005
, “
A Robust Design Approach for Enhancing the Feeling Quality of a Product: A Car Profile Case Study
,”
Int. J. Ind. Ergonom.
,
35
(
5
), pp.
445
460
.
17.
Dagher
,
A.
, and
Petiot
,
J.-F.
, 2007, “
Study of the Correlation Between User Preferences and Design Factors: Application to Cars Front-End Design
,”
The International Conference on Engineering Design
, (
ICED'07
), Paris, France, Aug. 28–31, pp. 1–12.https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjfntP4idDaAhWMtlMKHRKbA3oQFggmMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.designsociety.org%2Fdownload-publication%2F25735%2FStudy%2Bof%2Bthe%2BCorrelations%2BBetween%2BUser%2BPreferences%2Band%2BDesign%2BFactors%253A%2BApplication%2Bto%2BCars%2BFront-End%2BDesign&usg=AOvVaw07dmPbvkLpIB7Eod3J1-i6
18.
Orbay
,
G.
,
Fu
,
L. T.
, and
Kara
,
L. B.
,
2015
, “
Deciphering the Influence of Product Shape on Consumer Judgments Through Geometric Abstraction
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
8
), p.
081103
.
19.
Yumer
,
M. E.
,
Chaudhuri
,
S.
,
Hodgins
,
J. K.
, and
Kara
,
L. B.
,
2015
, “
Semantic Shape Editing Using Deformation Handles
,”
ACM Trans. Graph.
,
34
(
4
), p.
86
.
20.
Reid
,
T.
,
MacDonald
,
E.
, and
Du
,
P.
,
2013
, “
Impact of Product Design Representation on Customer Judgment
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
135
(
9
), p.
091008
.
21.
MacDonald
,
E. F.
,
Lubensky
,
A.
,
Sohns
,
B.
, and
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
,
2009
, “
Product Semantics and Wine Portfolio Optimisation
,”
Int. J. Prod. Develop.
,
7
(
1/2
), pp.
73
98
.
22.
She
,
J.
, and
MacDonald
,
E.
,
2013
, “
Trigger Features on Prototypes Increase Preference for Sustainability
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2013-12973.
23.
Kelly
,
J. C.
,
Maheut
,
P.
,
Petiot
,
J.
, and
Papalambros
,
P.
,
2011
, “
Incorporating User Shape Preference in Engineering Design Optimisation
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
22
(
9
), pp.
627
650
.
24.
Swamy
,
S.
,
Orsborn
,
S.
,
Michalek
,
J.
, and
Cagan
,
J.
,
2007
, “
Measurement of Headlight Form Preference Using Choice Based Conjoint Analysis
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2007-35409.
25.
Orsborn
,
S.
,
Cagan
,
J.
, and
Boatwright
,
P.
,
2009
, “
Quantifying Aesthetic Form Preference in a Utility Function
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
131
(
6
), p.
061001
.
26.
Just
,
M. A.
, and
Carpenter
,
P. A.
,
1976
, “
Eye Fixations and Cognitive Processes
,”
Cognit. Psychol.
,
8
(
4
), pp.
441
480
.
27.
Du
,
P.
, and
MacDonald
,
E.
,
2014
, “
Eye-Tracking Data Predict Importance of Product Features and Saliency of Size Change
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
8
), p.
081005
.
28.
Du
,
P.
, and
MacDonald
,
E.
,
2015
, “
Eye-Tracking Aids in Understanding Consumer Product Evaluations
,”
The Psychology of Design: Creating Consumer Desire
,
R.
Batra
,
D.
Brei
, and
C.
Seifert
, eds.,
M.E. Sharpe
, New York.
29.
Duchowski
,
A. T.
,
2007
,
Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice
,
Springer
,
London
.
30.
Ashby
,
F. G.
,
Maddox
,
W. T.
, and
Bohil
,
C. J.
,
2002
, “
Observational Versus Feedback Training in Rule-Based and Information-Integration Category Learning
,”
Mem. Cognit.
,
30
(
5
), pp.
666
677
.
31.
Pernice
,
K.
, and
Nielsen
,
J.
,
2009
,
How to Conduct Eyetracking Studies
,
Nielsen Norman Group
,
Fremont, CA
.
32.
She
,
J.
,
2013
, “Designing Features That Influence Decisions About Sustainable Products,”
Ph.D. thesis
, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13584/
33.
Evans
,
J. S. B. T.
, and
Stanovich
,
K. E.
,
2013
, “
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate
,”
Perspect. Psychol. Sci.
,
8
(
3
), pp.
223
241
.
34.
Maxcey-Richard
,
A. M.
, and
Hollingworth
,
A.
,
2013
, “
The Strategic Retention of Task-Relevant Objects in Visual Working Memory
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn., Mem., Cognit.
,
39
(
3
), pp.
760
772
.
35.
Hollingworth
,
A.
,
Matsukura
,
M.
, and
Luck
,
S. J.
,
2013
, “
Visual Working Memory Modulates Low-Level Saccade Target Selection: Evidence From Rapidly Generated Saccades in the Global Effect Paradigm
,”
J. Vision
,
13
(
13
), pp.
1
18
.
You do not currently have access to this content.