Functional fixedness refers to a cognitive bias that prevents people from using objects in new ways and more abstractly from perceiving problems in new ways. Supporting people in overcoming functional fixedness could improve creative problem solving and capacities for creative design. A study was conducted to detect whether a relationship exists between participants' tendency to reorient objects presented as stimuli in an alternative uses test (AUT) and their creativity, also measured using the Wallach Kogan (WaKo) pattern meanings test. The AUT measures creativity as a function of identifying alternative uses for traditional objects. The WaKo pattern meanings test detects the ability to see an abstract pattern as different possible objects or scenes. Also studied is whether Kruglanski's need for closure (NFC) scale, a psychological measure, can predict the ability to incorporate reorientation cues when identifying uses. This study revealed highly significant, high correlations between reorientation and several creativity measures, and a correlation between reorientation and the predictability subscale of the NFC scale. A qualitative exploration of participants' responses reveals further metrics that may be relevant to assessing creativity in the AUT.

References

References
1.
Duncker
,
K.
,
1945
, “
On Problem Solving
,”
Psychol. Monogr.
,
58
(5), p. i-113.
2.
Batchelder
,
W. H.
, and
Alexander
,
G. E.
,
2012
, “
Insight Problem Solving: A Critical Examination of the Possibility of Formal Theory
,”
J. Probl. Solving
,
5
(
1
), pp.
56
100
.
3.
Ohlsson
,
S.
,
1984
, “
Restructuring Revisited—I: Summary and Critique of the Gestalt Theory of Problem Solving
,”
Scand. J. Psychol.
,
25
(1), pp.
65
78
.
4.
Ohlsson
,
S.
,
1984
, “
Restructuring Revisited—II: An Information Processing Theory of Restructuring and Insight
,”
Scand. J. Psychol.
,
25
(2), pp.
117
129
.
5.
Oltețeanu
,
A.-M.
,
2015
, “
‘Seeing As' and Re-Representation: Their Relation to Insight, Creative Problem-Solving and Types of Creativity
,”
Workshop Computational Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence, Publications of the Institute of Cognitive Science
, Osnabrück, Germany, Paper No.
4
.http://www.academia.edu/18979049/_Seeing_as_and_Re-representation_Their_Relation_to_Insight_Creative_Problem-Solving_and_Types_of_Creativity
6.
Guilford
,
J. P.
,
1956
, “
The Structure of Intellect
,”
Psychol. Bull.
,
53
(4), p.
267
.
7.
Guilford
,
J. P.
,
1967
,
The Nature of Human Intelligence
,
McGraw-Hill
, New York.
8.
Zeki
,
S.
,
2004
, “
The Neurology of Ambiguity
,”
Conscious. Cognit.
,
13
(
1
), pp.
173
196
.
9.
Kruglanski
,
A.
, and
Webster
,
D. K. A.
,
1993
, “
Motivated Resistance and Openness to Persuasion in the Presence or Absence of Prior Information
,”
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
,
65
(
5
), pp.
861
876
.
10.
Plaks
,
J.
,
2011
,
The Social Psychology of Motivation
,
Oxford University Press
, Don Mills, ON, Canada.
11.
Webster
,
D.
, and
Kruglanski
,
A.
,
1994
, “
Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure
,”
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
,
67
(
6
), pp.
1049
1062
.
12.
Toh
,
C.
, and
Miller
,
S.
,
2016
, “The Preferences for Creativity Scale (PCS): Identifying the Underlying Constructs of Creative Concept Selection,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2016-60414.
13.
Lai
,
S. L.
, and
Shu
,
L. H.
,
2016
, “
Individual Differences in Tendency for Design Fixation
,”
Design Computing & Cognition
,
Evanston, IL
, June 27–29, pp.
321
338
.
14.
Lai
,
S.-L.
, and
Shu
,
L. H.
,
2014
, “
Do-It-Yourselfers as Lead Users for Environmentally Conscious Behavior
,”
Procedia CIRP
,
15C
, pp.
431
436
.
15.
Kumar
,
V.
, and
Mocko
,
G.
,
2016
, “Similarity of Engineering Design Problems to Enable Reuse in Design Research Experiments,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2016-60474.
16.
Marshall
,
K. S.
,
Crawford
,
R.
, and
Jensen
,
D.
,
2016
, “Analogy Seeded Mind-Maps: A Comparison of Verbal and Pictorial Representation of Analogies in the Concept Generation Process,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2016-60100.
17.
Lenau
,
T. A.
,
Keshwani
,
S.
,
Chakrabarti
,
A.
, and
Ahmed-Kristensen
,
S.
,
2015
, “Biocards and Level of Abstraction,” 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (
ICED
), Milan, Italy, July 27–30, pp.
177
186
.https://www.designsociety.org/publication/37706/biocards_and_level_of_abstraction
18.
Wallach
,
M. A.
, and
Kogan
,
N.
,
1965
,
Modes of Thinking in Young Children: A Study of the Creativity-Intelligence Distinction
,
Holt Rinehart & Winston
, New York.
19.
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
Tseng
,
I.
,
Fu
,
K.
,
Cagan
,
J.
,
Wood
,
K. L.
, and
Schunn
,
C. D.
,
2010
, “
A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Design Faculty
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
132
(
4
), p.
041003
.
20.
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
Clauss
,
E. F.
,
Kurtoglu
,
T.
,
Murphy
,
J. T.
,
Wood
,
K. L.
, and
Markman
,
A. B.
,
2011
, “
An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
133
(
3
), p.
031008
.
21.
Oltețeanu
,
A.-M.
,
2015
, “
The Input, Coherence, Generativity (ICG) Factors. Towards a Model of Cognitive Informativity Measures for Productive Cognitive Systems
,”
Workshop Competition Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence
, Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück, Germany, Paper No.
5
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277570382_The_Input_Coherence_Generativity_ICG_Factors_Towards_a_Model_of_Cognitive_Informativity_Measures_for_Productive_Cognitive_Systems.
22.
Viswanathan
,
V. K.
, and
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
2013
, “
Design Fixation and Its Mitigation: A Study on the Role of Expertise
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
135
(
5
), p.
051008
.
23.
Oltețeanu
,
A.-M.
, and
Falomir
,
Z.
,
2016
, “
Object Replacement and Object Composition in a Creative Cognitive System. Towards a Computational Solver of the Alternative Uses Test
,”
Cognitive Syst. Res.
,
39
, pp.
15
32
.
24.
Shah
,
J. J.
,
Vargas-Hernandez
,
N.
, and
Smith
,
S. M.
,
2003
, “
Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness
,”
Des. Stud.
,
24
(2), pp.
111
113
.
25.
Johnson
,
T. A.
,
Cheeley
,
A.
,
Caldwell
,
B. W.
, and
Green
,
M.
,
2016
, “Comparison and Extensions of Novelty Metrics for Problem-Solving Tasks,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2016-60319.
26.
Fu
,
K.
,
Yang
,
M. C.
, and
Wood
,
K. L.
,
2016
, “
Design Principles: Literature Review, Analysis, and Future Directions
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
138
(
10
), p.
101103
.
27.
Pang
,
M.
, and
Seepersad
,
C.
,
2016
, “Crowd-Sourcing the Evaluation of Design Concepts with Empathic Priming,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2016-59417.
28.
Fuge
,
M.
,
Stroud
,
J.
, and
Agogino
,
A.
,
2013
, “Automatically Inferring Metrics for Design Creativity,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2013-12620.
29.
Kruglanski
,
A. W.
, and
Fishman
,
S.
,
2009
, “
The Need for Cognitive Closure
,”
Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior
,
Guilford Press
, New York, pp.
343
353
.
30.
Mayseless
,
O.
, and
Kruglanski
,
A. W.
,
1987
, “
What Makes You So Sure? Effects of Epistemic Motivations on Judgmental Confidence
,”
Organ. Behav. Human Decis. Processes
,
39
(
2
), pp.
162
183
.
31.
Kudrowitz
,
B.
, and
Dippo
,
C.
,
2013
, “
When Does a Paper Clip Become a Sundial? Exploring the Progression of Novelty in the Alternative Uses Test
,”
J. Integr. Des. Process Sci.
,
17
(
4
), pp.
3
18
.
You do not currently have access to this content.