The gap between consumers saying that they want and selecting sustainable products can be addressed through product design. Our previous research proposed a method for creating visible product features that trigger pro-environmental behavior in consumers, termed sustainability triggers (STs). The study below designed two experiments to mimic real-world decision scenarios and demonstrated that exposure to these STs caused pro-environmental behavior in two test versus control experiments. The experiments used both realistic prototypes and images of toasters. In experiment 1, a qualitative preference-elicitation method demonstrated that exposure to STs increased thoughts of sustainability—related decision criteria. In experiment 2, subjects' prioritization of “hidden” sustainability-related attributes, shipping method and energy usage, was higher if exposed to the STs. This was indicated by choice, information search, importance rating, and eye tracking. Thus, the novel design method to create product STs is demonstrated effective in the test case and has the potential to broadly benefit the success of sustainable products in the market.

References

References
1.
Vining
,
J.
,
Ebreo
,
A.
,
Bechtel
,
R. B.
, and
Churchman
,
A.
,
2002
, “
Emerging Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives on Conservation Behavior
,”
Handbook of Environmental Psychology
,
Wiley
,
New York
, pp.
541
558
.
2.
Bennett
,
J.
, and
Blamey
,
R.
,
2001
,
The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation
,
Anonymous
ed.,
Edward Elgar Publishing Limited
,
Northhampton, MA
.
3.
Soskin
,
M.
, and
Squires
,
H.
,
2013
, “
Homeowner Willingness to Pay for Rooftop Solar Electricity Generation
,”
Environ. Econ.
,
4
(
1
), pp.
102
111
.https://businessperspectives.org/journals/environmental-economics/issue-218/homeowner-willingness-to-pay-for-rooftop-solar-electricity-generation
4.
Schubert
,
R.
, and
Stadelmann
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Energy-Using Durables—Why Consumers Refrain From Economically Optimal Choices
,”
Front. Energy Res.
,
3
, p. 7.
5.
MacDonald
,
E. F.
,
Gonzalez
,
R.
, and
Papalambros
,
P.
,
2009
, “
The Construction of Preferences for Crux and Sentinel Product Attributes
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
20
(
6
), pp.
609
626
.
6.
O'Rourke
,
D.
, and
Ringer
,
A.
,
2016
, “
The Impact of Sustainability Information on Consumer Decision Making
,”
J. Ind. Ecology
,
20
(
4
), pp.
882
892
.
7.
Bao
,
Q.
,
Shaukat
,
M. M.
,
Elantary
,
A.
, and
Yang
,
M. C.
,
2016
, “
Eco-Feedback Designs: A Balance Between the Quantitative and the Emotional
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2016-59376.
8.
Slovic
,
P.
,
1995
, “
The Construction of Preference
,”
Am. Psychol.
,
50
(
5
), pp.
364
371
.
9.
Goucher-Lambert
,
K.
, and
Cagan
,
J.
,
2015
, “
The Impact of Sustainability on Consumer Preference Judgments of Product Attributes
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
8
), p.
081401
.
10.
MacDonald
,
E. F.
,
Whitefoot
,
K.
,
Allison
,
J. T.
,
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
, and
Gonzalez
,
R.
,
2010
, “
An Investigation of Sustainability, Preference, and Profitability in Design Optimization
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2010-29055.
11.
MacDonald
,
E.
, and
She
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Seven Cognitive Concepts for Successful Eco-Design
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
92
, pp.
23
36
.
12.
D'Souza
,
C.
,
2004
, “
Ecolabel Programmes: A Stakeholder (Consumer) Perspective
,”
Corp. Commun.: An Int. J.
,
9
(
3
), pp.
179
188
.
13.
Krishna
,
A.
, and
Morrin
,
M.
,
2008
, “
Does Touch Affect Taste? The Perceptual Transfer of Product Container Haptic Cues
,”
J. Consum. Res.
,
34
(
6
), pp.
807
818
.
14.
Krishna
,
A.
,
2012
, “
An Integrative Review of Sensory Marketing: Engaging the Senses to Affect Perception, Judgment and Behavior
,”
J. Consum. Psychol.
,
22
(
3
), pp.
332
351
.
15.
Lwin
,
M. O.
,
Morrin
,
M.
, and
Krishna
,
A.
,
2010
, “
Exploring the Superadditive Effects of Scent and Pictures on Verbal Recall: An Extension of Dual Coding Theory
,”
J. Consum. Psychol.
,
20
(
3
), pp.
317
326
.
16.
Sayin
,
E.
,
Krishna
,
A.
,
Ardelet
,
C.
,
Briand Decré
,
G.
, and
Goudey
,
A.
,
2015
, “
‘Sound and Safe’: The Effect of Ambient Sound on the Perceived Safety of Public Spaces
,”
Int. J. Res. Mark.
,
32
(
4
), pp.
343
353
.
17.
Cian
,
L.
,
Krishna
,
A.
, and
Elder
,
R. S.
,
2015
, “
A Sign of Things to Come: Behavioral Change Through Dynamic Iconography
,”
J. Consum. Res.
,
41
(
6
), pp.
1426
1446
.
18.
Sengupta
,
J.
, and
Gorn
,
G. J.
,
2002
, “
Absence Makes the Mind Grow Sharper: Effects of Element Omission on Subsequent Recall
,”
J. Mark. Res.
,
39
(
2
), pp.
186
201
.
19.
Tybout
,
A. M.
, and
Hauser
,
J. R.
,
1981
, “
A Marketing Audit Using a Conceptual-Model of Consumer Behavior: Application and Evaluation
,”
J. Mark.
,
45
(
3
), pp.
82
101
.
20.
Withanage
,
C.
,
Ashok
,
R.
,
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
, and
Otto
,
K.
,
2014
, “
Identifying and Categorizing Opportunities for Design for Sustainable User Behavior
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2014-34798.
21.
Hauser
,
J. R.
,
1978
, “
Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness, and Significance of Probabilistic Choice Models: An Information-Theoretic Approach
,”
Oper. Res.
,
26
(
3
), pp.
406
421
.
22.
Long
,
M.
, and
Ross Morrow
,
W.
,
2015
, “
Should Optimal Designers Worry about Consideration?
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
7
), p.
071411
.
23.
She
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Designing Features That Influence Decisions About Sustainable Products
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13584/
24.
She
,
J.
, and
MacDonald
,
E.
,
2014
, “
Priming Designers to Communicate Sustainability
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
1
), p.
011001
.
25.
Payne
,
J. W.
,
Bettman
,
J. R.
, and
Johnson
,
E. J.
,
1992
, “
Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Respective
,”
Annu. Rev. Psychol.
,
43
, pp.
87
131
.
26.
Mandel
,
N.
, and
Johnson
,
E. J.
,
2002
, “
When Web Pages Influence Choice: Effects of Visual Primes on Experts and Novices
,”
J. Consum. Res.
,
29
(
2
), pp.
235
245
.
27.
Haubl
,
G.
, and
Murray
,
K. B.
,
2003
, “
Preference Construction and Persistence in Digital Marketplaces: The Role of Electronicrecommendation Agents
,”
J. Consum. Psychol.
,
13
(
1–2
), pp.
75
91
.
28.
Brown
,
C. L.
, and
Carpenter
,
G. S.
,
2000
, “
Why Is the Trivial Important? A Reasons-Based Account for the Effects of Trivial Attributes on Choice
,”
J. Consum. Res.
,
26
(
4
), pp.
372
385
.
29.
Chen
,
H. Q.
,
Honda
,
T.
, and
Yang
,
M. C.
,
2013
, “
Approaches for Identifying Consumer Preferences for the Design of Technology Products: A Case Study of Residential Solar Panels
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
135
(
6
), p.
061007
.
30.
Jansen
,
S. J. T.
,
Coolen
,
H. C. C. H.
, and
Goetgeluk
,
R. W.
,
2011
,
Discussion and Directions for Future Research, the Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice
,
Springer
,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands
, pp.
253
264
.
31.
Park
,
Y.-H.
,
Ding
,
M.
, and
Rao
,
V. R.
,
2008
, “
Eliciting Preference for Complex Products: A Web-Based Upgrading Method
,”
J. Mark. Res.
,
45
(
5
), pp.
562
574
.
32.
Srinivasan
,
V.
,
1988
, “
A Conjunctive-Compensatory Approach to the Self-Explication of Multiattributed Preferences
,”
Decis. Sci.
,
19
(
2
), pp.
295
305
.
33.
de Medeiros
,
J. F.
, and
Ribeiro
,
J. L. D.
,
2017
, “
Environmentally Sustainable Innovation: Expected Attributes in the Purchase of Green Products
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
142
(
Pt. 1
), pp.
240
248
.
34.
Ding
,
M.
,
Hauser
,
J. R.
,
Dong
,
S.
,
Dzyabura
,
D.
,
Yang
,
Z.
,
Su
,
C.
, and
Gaskin
,
S. P.
,
2011
, “
Unstructured Direct Elicitation of Decision Rules
,”
J. Mark. Res.
,
48
(
1
), pp.
116
127
.
35.
Hauser
,
J. R.
,
Dahan
,
E.
,
Yee
,
M.
, and
Orlin
,
J.
,
2006
, “
‘Must Have’ Aspects Vs. Tradeoff Aspects in Models of Customer Decisions
,”
Sawtooth Software Conference
, Del Ray Beach, FL, Mar. 29--31, pp. 169–181.http://www.mit.edu/~hauser/Papers/Greedoid%20Sawtooth%20Conference%20Paper%2006_19_06.pdf
36.
Wang
,
M.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2015
, “
A Data-Driven Network Analysis Approach to Predicting Customer Choice Sets for Choice Modeling in Engineering Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
7
), p.
071410
.
37.
Orsborn
,
S.
,
Cagan
,
J.
, and
Boatwright
,
P.
,
2009
, “
Quantifying Aesthetic Form Preference in a Utility Function
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
131
(
6
), p.
061001
.
38.
Hauser
,
J. R.
, and
Rao
,
V. R.
,
2004
,
Conjoint Analysis, Related Modeling, and Applications, Advances in Markeing Research: Progress and Prospects
,
Kluwer Academic
,
Norwell, MA
, pp.
141
168
.
39.
Hauser
,
J. R.
,
Ding
,
M.
, and
Gaskin
,
S. P.
,
2009
, “
Non-Compensatory (and Compensatory) Models of Consideration-Set Decisions
,”
Sawtooth Software Conference
, Delray Beach, FL, Mar. 25–-27, pp. 207–232.http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.499.1017&rep=rep1&type=pdf
40.
Dzyabura
,
D.
,
Jagabathula
,
S.
, and
Muller
,
E.
,
2016
, “
Using Online Preference Measurement to Infer Offline Purchase Behavior
,”
Marketing Sci.
, in press.http://people.stern.nyu.edu/ddzyabur/index_files/DzyaburaJagabathulaMuller2017.pdf
41.
She
,
J.
, and
MacDonald
,
E.
,
2013
, “
Trigger Features on Prototypes Increase Preference for Sustainability
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2013-12973.
42.
Goucher-Lambert
,
K.
,
Moss
,
J.
, and
Cagan
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Inside the Mind: Using Neuroimaging to Understand Moral Product Preference Judgments Involving Sustainability
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
139
(
4
), p.
041103
.
You do not currently have access to this content.