Most of the prior studies on power-split hybrid electric vehicle's (PS-HEV) design focused on the powertrain configuration optimization. Yet, depicting the selected configuration is highly required for further design steps, ultimately manufacturing. This paper proposes an automatic approach to generate all the feasible kinematic diagrams for a given configuration with a single planetary gear (PG) set. While the powertrain configuration, which is the output of prior studies, illustrates the connection of the powertrain components to the PG, the kinematic diagram is a schematic diagram depicting the connections and arrangements of the components. First, positioning diagrams, specifying the position of the components with respect to each other and to the PG, are used to find all the possible arrangements. Then, given that the positioning diagrams have a one-to-one relationship with the kinematic diagrams, the feasible kinematic diagrams are identified using a set of feasibility rules applicable to the positioning diagrams. Finally, few guidelines are introduced to select good kinematic diagrams that best suit the overall vehicle design. Various configurations were investigated, and three of them including Prius and Voltec first-generation single PG configurations are discussed. The study reveals that the kinematic diagrams that have been patented are only a subset of all the feasible kinematic diagrams, and that even some good kinematic diagrams with better manufacturability are identified using this methodology. Thus, this methodology guarantees the search of the entire design space and the selection of kinematic diagrams that best suit the desired vehicle.

References

References
1.
Kim
,
N.
,
Cha
,
S.
, and
Peng
,
H.
,
2011
, “
Optimal Control of Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Pontryagin's Minimum Principle
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
,
19
(
5
), pp.
1279
1287
.
2.
Liu
,
J.
, and
Peng
,
H.
,
2006
, “
Control Optimization for a Power-Split Hybrid Vehicle
,”
American Control Conference
(
ACC
), Minneapolis, MN, June 14–16, pp. 466–571.
3.
Liu
,
J.
, and
Peng
,
H.
,
2008
, “
Modeling and Control of a Power-Split Hybrid Vehicle
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
,
16
(
6
), pp.
1242
1251
.
4.
Zhang
,
X.
,
Peng
,
H.
, and
Sun
,
J.
,
2013
, “
A Near-Optimal Power Management Strategy for Rapid Component Sizing of Power Split Hybrid Vehicles With Multiple Operating Modes
,”
American Control Conference
(
ACC
), Washington, DC, June 17–19, pp.
5972
5977
.
5.
Yamaguchi
,
K.
, and
Miyaishi
,
Y.
,
1997
, “
Hybrid Vehicle Powertrain
,” U.S. Patent No.
5,643,119
.
6.
Koide
,
T.
,
Matsui
,
H.
, and
Nada
,
M.
,
1999
, “
Hybrid Vehicle Drive System Having Two Motor/Generator Units and Engine Starting Means
,” U.S. Patent No.
5,934,395
.
7.
Nagano
,
S.
,
Morisawa
,
K.
,
Matsui
,
H.
, and
Ibaraki
,
R.
,
2000
, “
Hybrid Drive System Wherein Planetary Gear Mechanism is Disposed Radially Inwardly of Stator Coil of Motor/Generator
,” U.S. Patent No.
6,155,364
.
8.
Hata
,
H.
,
Matsui
,
H.
, and
Ibaraki
,
R.
,
2005
, “
Power Output Device, Hybrid Vehicle, and Method of Controlling Them
,” U.S. Patent No.
6,886,648
.
9.
Buchsbaum
,
F.
, and
Freudenstein
,
F.
,
1970
, “
Synthesis of Kinematic Structure of Geared Kinematic Chains and Other Mechanisms
,”
J. Mech.
,
5
(
3
), pp.
357
392
.
10.
Ravisankar
,
R.
, and
Mruthyunjaya
,
T. S.
,
1985
, “
Computerized Synthesis of the Structure of Geared Kinematic Chains
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
20
(
5
), pp.
367
387
.
11.
Mruthyunjaya
,
T. S.
, and
Raghavan
,
M. R.
,
1984
, “
Computer-Aided Analysis of the Structure of Kinematic Chains
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
19
(
3
), pp.
357
368
.
12.
Del Castillo
,
J. M.
,
2002
, “
Enumeration of 1-DOF Planetary Gear Train Graphs Based on Functional Constraints
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
124
(
4
), pp.
723
732
.
13.
Hsu
,
C. H.
, and
Lam
,
K. T.
,
1992
, “
A New Graph Representation for Automatic Kinematic Analysis of Planetary Spur-Gear Trains
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
114
(
1
), pp.
196
200
.
14.
Ngo
,
H.
, and
Yan
,
H.
,
2016
, “
Configuration Synthesis of Series–Parallel Hybrid Transmissions
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D
,
230
(
5
), pp.
664
678
.
15.
Yan
,
H. S.
,
1998
,
Creative Design of Mechanical Devices
,
Springer Science + Business Media
, Singapore.
16.
Chatterjee
,
G.
, and
Tsai
,
L. W.
,
1994
, “Enumeration of Epicyclic-Type Automatic Transmission Gear Trains,”
SAE
Paper No. 941012.
17.
Chatterjee G., and Tsai L. W.,
1996
, “
Computer-Aided Sketching of Epicyclic-Type Automatic Transmission Gear Trains
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
118
(3), pp. 405–411.
18.
Hsu
,
C. H.
, and
Hsu
,
J. J.
,
2000
, “
Epicyclic Gear Trains for Automotive Transmissions
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D
,
214
(
5
), pp.
523
532
.
19.
Xue
,
H. L.
,
Liu
,
G.
, and
Yang
,
X. H.
,
2016
, “
A Review of Graph Theory Application Research in Gears
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C
,
230
(
10
), pp.
1697
1714
.
20.
Barhoumi
,
T.
, and
Kum
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Automated Schematic Design of Power-Split Hybrid Vehicles With a Single Planetary Gear
,”
ASME
Paper No. DSCC2014-6086.
21.
Kim
,
H.
, and
Kum
,
D.
,
2016
, “
Comprehensive Design Methodology of Input- and Output-Split Hybrid Electric Vehicles: In Search of Optimal Configuration
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics
,
21
(
6
), pp.
2912
2923
.
22.
Zhang
,
X.
,
Li
,
C. T.
,
Kum
,
D.
, and
Peng
,
H.
,
2012
, “
Prius+ and Volt−: Configuration Analysis of Power-Split Hybrid Vehicles With a Single Planetary Gear
,”
IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.
,
61
(
8
), pp.
3544
3552
.
23.
Mi
,
C.
,
Masrur
,
M. A.
, and
Gao
,
D. W.
,
2011
, “
Advanced HEV Architectures and Dynamics of HEV Powertrain
,”
Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Principles and Applications With Practical Perspectives
, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp.
69
106
.
24.
Tsai
,
L. W.
,
2000
,
Mechanism Design: Enumeration of Kinematic Structures According to Function
,
CRC Press
, Boca Raton, FL.
You do not currently have access to this content.