A current issue in metal-based additive manufacturing (AM) is achieving consistent, desired process outcomes in manufactured parts. When process outcomes such as strength, density, or precision need to meet certain specifications, changes in process variable selection can be made to meet these requirements. However, the changes required to achieve a better part performance may not be intuitive, particularly because process variable changes can simultaneously improve some outcomes while worsening others. There is great potential to design the additive manufacturing process, tailoring process variables based on user requirements for a given part. In this work, the tradeoffs between multiple process outcomes are formalized and the design problem is explored throughout the design space of process variables. Based on user input for each process outcome considered, P–V (power–velocity) process design charts are introduced, which map the process space and identify the best combination of process variables to achieve a user's desired outcome.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2017
Research-Article
Power–Velocity Process Design Charts for Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing
Daniel R. Clymer,
Daniel R. Clymer
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: dclymer@andrew.cmu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: dclymer@andrew.cmu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Jonathan Cagan,
Jonathan Cagan
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: cagan@cmu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: cagan@cmu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Jack Beuth
Jack Beuth
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: beuth@andrew.cmu.edu
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: beuth@andrew.cmu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Daniel R. Clymer
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: dclymer@andrew.cmu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: dclymer@andrew.cmu.edu
Jonathan Cagan
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: cagan@cmu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: cagan@cmu.edu
Jack Beuth
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: beuth@andrew.cmu.edu
Carnegie Mellon University,
5000 Forbes Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: beuth@andrew.cmu.edu
Contributed by the Design for Manufacturing Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received December 19, 2016; final manuscript received May 31, 2017; published online August 30, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Paul Witherell.
J. Mech. Des. Oct 2017, 139(10): 100907 (7 pages)
Published Online: August 30, 2017
Article history
Received:
December 19, 2016
Revised:
May 31, 2017
Citation
Clymer, D. R., Cagan, J., and Beuth, J. (August 30, 2017). "Power–Velocity Process Design Charts for Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing." ASME. J. Mech. Des. October 2017; 139(10): 100907. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037302
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Multi-Split Configuration Design for Fluid-Based Thermal Management Systems
J. Mech. Des (February 2025)
Related Articles
Probabilistic Digital Twin for Additive Manufacturing Process Design and Control
J. Mech. Des (September,2022)
Assessing the Manufacturability of Students’ Early-Stage Designs Based on Previous Experience With Traditional Manufacturing and Additive Manufacturing
J. Mech. Des (January,2024)
Additive Manufacturing Constraints in Topology Optimization for Improved Manufacturability
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (May,2018)
Incubation Time and Cavitation Erosion Rate of Work-Hardening Materials
J. Fluids Eng (February,2009)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Section XI Flaw Acceptance Criteria and Evaluation Using Code Procedures
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 2, Sixth Edition
Introduction and Definitions
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design
Concept Development
Effective Innovation: The Development of Winning Technologies