Current design theory lacks a systematic method to identify what designers know that helps them to create innovative products. In the early stages of idea generation, designers may find novel ideas come readily to mind, or may become fixated on their own or existing products. This may limit the ability to consider more and more varied candidate concepts that may potentially lead to innovation. To aid in idea generation, we sought to identify “design heuristics,” or “rules of thumb,” evident in award-winning designs. In this paper, we demonstrate a content analysis method for discovering heuristics in the designs of innovative products. Our method depends on comparison to a baseline of existing products so that the innovative change can be readily identified. Through an analysis of key features and functional elements in the designs of over 400 award-winning products, 40 heuristic principles were extracted. These design heuristics are outlined according to their perceived role in changing an existing product concept into a novel design, and examples of other products using the heuristics are provided. To demonstrate the ease of use of these design heuristics, we examined outcomes from a classroom study and found that concepts created using design heuristics were rated as more creative and varied. The analysis of changes from existing to innovative products can provide evidence of useful heuristic principles to apply in creating new designs.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2016
Research-Article
Design Heuristics in Innovative Products
Seda Yilmaz,
Seda Yilmaz
Department of Industrial Design,
Iowa State University,
146 College of Design,
Ames, IA 50010
e-mail: seda@iastate.edu
Iowa State University,
146 College of Design,
Ames, IA 50010
e-mail: seda@iastate.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Colleen Seifert,
Colleen Seifert
Department of Psychology,
University of Michigan,
3042 East Hall,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: seifert@umich.edu
University of Michigan,
3042 East Hall,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: seifert@umich.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Shanna R. Daly,
Shanna R. Daly
College of Engineering,
University of Michigan,
210 Gorguze Family Laboratory,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: srdaly@umich.edu
University of Michigan,
210 Gorguze Family Laboratory,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: srdaly@umich.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard Gonzalez
Richard Gonzalez
Department of Psychology,
University of Michigan,
426 Thompson Street,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: gonzo@umich.edu
University of Michigan,
426 Thompson Street,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: gonzo@umich.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Seda Yilmaz
Department of Industrial Design,
Iowa State University,
146 College of Design,
Ames, IA 50010
e-mail: seda@iastate.edu
Iowa State University,
146 College of Design,
Ames, IA 50010
e-mail: seda@iastate.edu
Colleen Seifert
Department of Psychology,
University of Michigan,
3042 East Hall,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: seifert@umich.edu
University of Michigan,
3042 East Hall,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: seifert@umich.edu
Shanna R. Daly
College of Engineering,
University of Michigan,
210 Gorguze Family Laboratory,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: srdaly@umich.edu
University of Michigan,
210 Gorguze Family Laboratory,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: srdaly@umich.edu
Richard Gonzalez
Department of Psychology,
University of Michigan,
426 Thompson Street,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: gonzo@umich.edu
University of Michigan,
426 Thompson Street,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: gonzo@umich.edu
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received February 13, 2015; final manuscript received November 11, 2015; published online June 1, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Carolyn Seepersad.
J. Mech. Des. Jul 2016, 138(7): 071102 (12 pages)
Published Online: June 1, 2016
Article history
Received:
February 13, 2015
Revised:
November 11, 2015
Citation
Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C., Daly, S. R., and Gonzalez, R. (June 1, 2016). "Design Heuristics in Innovative Products." ASME. J. Mech. Des. July 2016; 138(7): 071102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032219
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Large-Scale Needfinding: Methods of Increasing User-Generated Needs From Large Populations
J. Mech. Des (July,2015)
Comparing Ideation Techniques for Beginning Designers
J. Mech. Des (October,2016)
The Effects of Designers' Contextual Experience on the Ideation Process and Design Outcomes
J. Mech. Des (October,2018)
Experimental Study on the Associations Among Sketches Based on Design Cognition
J. Mech. Des (October,2018)
Related Proceedings Papers
Grammatical Evolution of Technical Processes
IDETC-CIE2009
A Computational Technique for Concept Generation
IDETC-CIE2005
Related Chapters
Processing Free Form Objects within a Product Development Process Framework
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 1
Stimulating Creative Design Alternatives Using Customer Values
Decision Making in Engineering Design
Cyber-Physical Systems, Blended Tool Environments, and Playful Creativity
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 2