We propose a framework for design roadmapping that parallels existing product roadmapping and technology roadmapping processes. It leverages three needs we have observed in organizations as they use existing roadmapping processes: (1) to focus on development of customer and user experiences (UX), not just on features; (2) to increase engagement of designers early in the planning process; and (3) to provide a means for rapidly responding to changes in the environment. Design roadmapping is an attempt to reconcile differences that arise when customer/user needs are not considered simultaneously with technology choices. The proposed design roadmapping process assists project prioritization and selection. The process aggregates design experience elements along a timeline that associates key user needs with the products, services, and/or systems the organization wishes to deliver. To illustrate the design roadmapping process, we conducted a case study in which we applied the design roadmapping process to projects undertaken by a large corporation's innovation lab located in research centers in San Francisco and Mountain View, CA, in partnership with corporate stakeholders located in Asia. The five-step design roadmapping procedure is provided along with detailed information. The decisions from the design roadmapping process have been incorporated into the company's commercial plans. Key findings in this corporate case study bolster the positive impact of design roadmapping in moving strategic thinking from a technology/feature-driven process to one that is design/experience-driven. It shows how firms might weigh choices between user needs, design principles, and technological innovation.

References

References
1.
Cooper
,
R. G.
,
1994
, “
Third-Generation New Product Processes
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
,
11
(
1
), pp.
3
14
.
2.
Phaal
,
R.
,
Farrukh
,
C.
, and
Probert
,
D.
,
2001
, “
Technology Roadmapping: Linking Technology Resources to Business Objectives
,”
Centre for Technology Management
, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
3.
An
,
Y.
,
Lee
,
S.
, and
Park
,
Y.
,
2008
, “
Development of an Integrated Product-Service Roadmap With QFD: A Case Study on Mobile Communications
,”
Int. J. Serv. Ind. Management
,
19
(
5
), pp.
621
638
.
4.
Garcia
,
M. L.
, and
Bray
,
O. H.
,
1997
, “
Fundamentals of Technology Roadmapping
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Report No.
SAND97-0665
.
5.
Ulrich
,
K. T.
, and
Eppinger
,
S. D.
,
2016
,
Product Design and Development
,
McGraw Hill Publishers
,
New York, NY
.
6.
Phaal
,
R.
, and
Muller
,
G.
,
2009
, “
An Architectural Framework for Roadmapping: Towards Visual Strategy
,”
Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change
,
76
(
1
), pp.
39
49
.
7.
Vähäniitty
,
J.
,
Lassenius
,
C.
, and
Rautiainen
,
K.
,
2002
, “
An Approach to Product Roadmapping in Small Software Product Businesses
,”
ECSQ
, pp.
12
13
.
8.
Cooper
,
R. G.
, and
Edgett
,
S. J.
,
2010
, “
Developing a Product Innovation and Technology Strategy for Your Business
,”
Res.-Technol. Manage.
,
53
(
3
), pp.
33
40
.
9.
Rinne
,
M.
,
2004
, “
Technology Roadmaps: Infrastructure for Innovation
,”
Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change
,
71
(
1
), pp.
67
80
.
10.
Petersen
,
K.
,
Wohlin
,
C.
, and
Baca
,
D.
,
2009
, “
The Waterfall Model in Large-Scale Development
,”
International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement
, Oulu, Finland, June 15–17, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 386–400.
11.
Meyer
,
M. H.
, and
Lehnerd
,
A. P.
,
1997
,
The Power of Product Platform
,
Simon & Schuster
,
New York, NY
.
12.
Brynjolfsson
,
E.
, and
McAfee
,
A.
,
2011
,
Race Against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy
,
Digital Frontier Press
,
Lexington, KY
.
13.
Beckman
,
S. L.
, and
Barry
,
M.
,
2007
, “
Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking
,”
Calif. Manage. Rev.
,
50
(
1
), pp.
25
56
.
14.
Voss
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Impact of Customer Integration on Project Portfolio Management and Its Success—Developing a Conceptual Framework
,”
Int. J. Proj. Manage.
,
30
(
5
), pp.
567
581
.
15.
Cooper
,
R. G.
,
2014
, “
What's Next?: After Stage-Gate
,”
Res.-Technol. Manage.
,
57
(
1
), pp.
20
31
.
16.
Kerr
,
C.
, and
Phaal
,
R.
,
2015
, “
Visualizing Roadmaps: A Design-Driven Approach
,”
Res.-Technol. Manage.
,
58
(
4
), pp.
45
54
.
17.
Simonse
,
L. W.
,
Hultink
,
E. J.
, and
Buijs
,
J. A.
,
2015
, “
Innovation Roadmapping: Building Concepts From Practitioners' Insights
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
,
32
(
6
), pp.
904
924
.
18.
Kim
,
E.
,
Yao
,
S.
, and
Agogino
,
A. M.
,
2015
, “
Design Roadmapping: Challenges and Opportunities
,”
20th International Conference on Engineering Design
(
ICED 15
), Milan, Italy, July 27–30, Vol.
6
, pp.
85
94
.
19.
Glaser
,
B. G.
,
1992
,
Emergence Versus Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis
,
Sociology Press
,
Mill Valley, CA
.
20.
Strauss
,
A.
, and
Corbin
,
J.
,
1998
,
Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory
,
Sage Publishing
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
.
21.
Zimmerman
,
J.
,
Forlizzi
,
J.
, and
Evenson
,
S.
,
2007
, “
Research Through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI
,”
SIGCHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
, San Jose, CA, pp.
493
502
.
22.
Von Hippel
,
E.
,
1986
, “
Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts
,”
Manage. Sci.
,
32
(
7
), pp.
791
805
.
23.
Brown
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Touchscreen Refrigerators and Talking Everything at CES 2016
,” accessed May 23, 2016, http://www.cnet.com/news/touchscreen-refrigerators-and-talking-everything-at-ces-2016/
You do not currently have access to this content.