In the second-order reliability method (SORM), the probability of failure is computed for an arbitrary performance function in arbitrarily distributed random variables. This probability is approximated by the probability of failure computed using a general quadratic fit made at the most probable point (MPP). However, an easy-to-use, accurate, and efficient closed-form expression for the probability content of the general quadratic surface in normalized standard variables has not yet been presented. Instead, the most commonly used SORM approaches start with a relatively complicated rotational transformation. Thereafter, the last row and column of the rotationally transformed Hessian are neglected in the computation of the probability. This is equivalent to approximating the probability content of the general quadratic surface by the probability content of a hyperparabola in a rotationally transformed space. The error made by this approximation may introduce unknown inaccuracies. Furthermore, the most commonly used closed-form expressions have one or more of the following drawbacks: They neither do work well for small curvatures at the MPP and/or large number of random variables nor do they work well for negative or strongly uneven curvatures at the MPP. The expressions may even present singularities. The purpose of this work is to present a simple, efficient, and accurate closed-form expression for the probability of failure, which does not neglect any component of the Hessian and does not necessitate the rotational transformation performed in the most common SORM approaches. Furthermore, when applied to industrial examples where quadratic response surfaces of the real performance functions are used, the proposed formulas can be applied directly to compute the probability of failure without locating the MPP, as opposed to the other first-order reliability method (FORM) and the other SORM approaches. The method is based on an asymptotic expansion of the sum of noncentral chi-squared variables taken from the literature. The two most widely used SORM approaches, an empirical SORM formula as well as FORM, are compared to the proposed method with regards to accuracy and computational efficiency. All methods have also been compared when applied to a wide range of hyperparabolic limit-state functions as well as to general quadratic limit-state functions in the rotationally transformed space, in order to quantify the error made by the approximation of the Hessian indicated above. In general, the presented method was the most accurate for almost all studied curvatures and number of random variables.

References

References
1.
Lemaire
,
M.
,
2009
,
Structural Reliability
,
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
2.
Madsen
,
H. O.
,
Krenk
,
S.
, and
Lind
,
N. C.
,
1986
,
Methods of Structural Safety
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
3.
Tvedt
,
L.
,
1988
, “
Distribution of Quadratic Forms in the Normal Space Application to Structural Reliability
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
,
116
(
6
), pp.
1183
1197
.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:6(1183)
4.
Lee
,
I.
,
Noh
,
Y.
, and
Yoo
,
D.
,
2012
, “
A Novel Second Order Reliability Method (SORM) Using Noncentral or Generalized Chi-Squared Distributions
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
134
(
10
), p.
100912
.10.1115/1.4007391
5.
Valdebenito
,
M. A.
, and
Schuller
,
G. I.
,
2010
, “
A Survey on Approaches for Reliability-Based Optimization
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
,
42
(
5
), pp.
645
663
.10.1007/s00158-010-0518-6
6.
Du
,
X.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2004
, “
Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
126
(
2
), pp.
225
233
.10.1115/1.1649968
7.
Youn
,
B. D.
,
Choi
,
K. K.
,
Yang
,
R.
, and
Gu
,
L.
,
2004
, “
Reliability-Based Design Optimization for Crashworthiness of Vehicle Side Impact
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
,
26
(
3
), pp.
272
283
.10.1007/s00158-003-0345-0
8.
Youn
,
B. D.
,
Xi
,
Z.
, and
Yang
,
P.
,
2008
, “
Eigenvector Dimension Reduction Method for Sensitivity-Free Probability Analysis
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
,
37
(
1
), pp.
13
28
.10.1007/s00158-007-0210-7
9.
Breitung
,
K.
,
1984
, “
Asymptotic Approximations for Multi-Normal Integrals
,”
J. Eng. Mech. Div.
,
110
(
3
), pp.
357
366
.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:3(357)
10.
Tvedt
,
L.
,
1983
, “
Two Second-Order Approximations to the Failure Probability-Section on Structural Reliability
,” Technical Report No. RDIV/20-004-83, A/S Veritas Research, Hovik.
11.
Ditlevsen
,
O.
, and
Madsen
,
H. O.
,
2005
, Structural Reliability Methods, Internet edition 2.2.5, Denmark.
12.
Zhao
,
Y.
, and
Ono
,
T.
,
1999
, “
New Approximations for SORM: Part 1
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
,
125
(1), pp.
79
85
.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:1(79)
13.
Choi
,
S.-K.
,
Grandhi
,
R.
, and
Canfield
,
R.
,
2007
,
Reliability-Based Structural Design
,
Springer-Verlag
,
London
.
14.
Jin
,
R.
,
Chen
,
W.
, and
Simpson
,
T. W.
,
2000
, “
Comparative Studies of Metamodeling Techniques Under Multiple Modeling Criteria
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
,
23
(1), pp.
1
13
.10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4
15.
Konishi
,
S.
,
Naoto
,
N.
, and
Gupta
,
A. K.
,
1988
, “
Asymptotic Expansion for the Distribution of Quadratic Forms
,”
Ann. Inst. Stat. Math.
,
40
(
2
), pp.
279
296
.10.1007/BF00052345
16.
Hasofer
,
A. M.
, and
Lind
,
N. C.
,
1974
, “
Exact and Invariant Second Moment Code Format
,”
ASCE J. Eng. Mech. Div.
,
100
(
1
), pp.
111
121
.
17.
Cai
,
G. Q.
, and
Elishakoff
,
I.
,
1994
, “
Refined Second-Order Reliability Analysis
,”
Struct. Saf.
,
14
, pp.
267
276
.10.1016/0167-4730(94)90015-9
18.
Koyluoglu
,
H. U.
, and
Nielsen
,
S. R. K.
,
1994
, “
New Approximations for SORM Integrals
,”
Struct. Saf.
,
13
(4), pp.
235
246
.10.1016/0167-4730(94)90031-0
19.
Du
,
X.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2000
, “
Towards a Better Understanding of Modeling Feasibility Robustness in Engineering Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
4
), pp.
385
394
.10.1115/1.1290247
20.
Phoon
,
K.
, and
Huang
,
S.
,
2007
, “
Uncertainty Quantification Using Multi-Dimensional Hermite Polynomials
,” Probabilistic Applications in Geotechnical Engineering,
American Society of Civil Engineers
, pp.
1
10
.10.1061/40914(233)12
21.
Eldred
,
M. S.
, and
Burkardt
,
J.
,
2009
, “
Comparison of Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos and Stochastic Collocation Methods for Uncertainty Quantification
,” AIAA Paper No. 2009-0976, pp.
1
20
.
22.
Kameshwar
,
S.
, and
Chakraborty
,
A.
,
2013
, “
On Reliability Evaluation of Structures Using Hermite Polynomial Chaos
,”
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Under Uncertainty: Safety Assessment and Management
, Springer India, pp.
1141
1152
.10.1007/978-81-322-0757-3_79
23.
Montgomery
,
D. C.
,
2001
,
Design and Analysis of Experiments
,
John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
, New York.
24.
ansys
,
2011
. 14.0 ed. s.l., SAS IP, Inc.
25.
Holtz
,
M.
,
2011
,
Sparse Grid Quadrature in High Dimensions With Applications in Finance and Insurance
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Heidelberg
.
26.
Rahman
,
S.
, and
Wei
,
D.
,
2006
, “
A Univariate Approximation at Most Probable Point for Higher-Order Reliability Analysis
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
, pp.
2820
2839
.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.053
27.
Kiureghian
,
A.
, and
Dakessian
,
T.
,
1998
, “
Multiple Design Points in First and Second-Order Reliability
,”
Struct. Saf.
,
20
(
1
), pp.
37
49
.10.1016/S0167-4730(97)00026-X
You do not currently have access to this content.