Risk management is a critical part of engineering practice in industry. Yet, the attitudes of engineers toward risk remain unknown and are not measured. This paper presents the development of a psychometric scale, the engineering-domain-specific risk-taking (E-DOSPERT) test, to measure engineers' risk aversion and risk seeking attitudes. Consistent with a similar psychometric scale to assess general risk attitudes, engineering risk attitude is not single domain and is not consistent across domains. Engineers have different risk attitudes toward five identified domains of engineering risk: processes, procedures and practices; engineering ethics; training; product functionality and design; and legal issues. Psychometric risk profiling with E-DOSPERT provides companies a standard to assess domain-specific engineering risk attitude within organizations and across organizations. It provides engineering educators a standard to assess the understanding of engineering students to the types of risks they would encounter in professional practice and their personal attitude toward responding to those risks. Appropriate interventions can then be implemented to shape risk attitudes as appropriate. Risk-based design decisions can also be shaped by a better understanding of engineer and customer risk attitude. Understanding engineers' risk attitudes is crucial in interpreting how individual engineers will respond to risk in their engineering activities and the numerous design decisions they make across the various domains of engineering risk found in professional practice.
Skip Nav Destination
Design Laboratory,
School of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
e-mail: Douglas.VanBossuyt@gmail.com
Information Technologies,
University of Sydney,
e-mail: Andy.Dong@sydney.edu.au
Design Laboratory,
School of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
e-mail: Irem.Tumer@oregonstate.edu
University of Sydney,
e-mail: Lucila.Carvalho@sydney.edu.au
Article navigation
December 2013
Research-Article
On Measuring Engineering Risk Attitudes1
Douglas L. Van Bossuyt,
Design Laboratory,
School of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
e-mail: Douglas.VanBossuyt@gmail.com
Douglas L. Van Bossuyt
2
Complex Engineered Systems
Design Laboratory,
School of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: Douglas.VanBossuyt@gmail.com
2Corresponding author.
Search for other works by this author on:
Andy Dong,
Information Technologies,
University of Sydney,
e-mail: Andy.Dong@sydney.edu.au
Andy Dong
Faculty of Engineering and
Information Technologies,
University of Sydney,
Sydney NSW 2006
, Australia
e-mail: Andy.Dong@sydney.edu.au
Search for other works by this author on:
Irem Y. Tumer,
Design Laboratory,
School of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
e-mail: Irem.Tumer@oregonstate.edu
Irem Y. Tumer
Complex Engineered Systems
Design Laboratory,
School of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: Irem.Tumer@oregonstate.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Lucila Carvalho
University of Sydney,
e-mail: Lucila.Carvalho@sydney.edu.au
Lucila Carvalho
Faculty of Education and Social Work
,University of Sydney,
Sydney NSW 2006
, Australia
e-mail: Lucila.Carvalho@sydney.edu.au
Search for other works by this author on:
Douglas L. Van Bossuyt
Complex Engineered Systems
Design Laboratory,
School of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: Douglas.VanBossuyt@gmail.com
Andy Dong
Faculty of Engineering and
Information Technologies,
University of Sydney,
Sydney NSW 2006
, Australia
e-mail: Andy.Dong@sydney.edu.au
Irem Y. Tumer
Complex Engineered Systems
Design Laboratory,
School of Mechanical, Industrial and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: Irem.Tumer@oregonstate.edu
Lucila Carvalho
Faculty of Education and Social Work
,University of Sydney,
Sydney NSW 2006
, Australia
e-mail: Lucila.Carvalho@sydney.edu.au
1A version of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of the 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conference & Computers in Engineering Conference, 23rd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology.
2Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received November 27, 2012; final manuscript received July 3, 2013; published online September 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: David Gorsich.
J. Mech. Des. Dec 2013, 135(12): 121001 (13 pages)
Published Online: September 18, 2013
Article history
Received:
November 27, 2012
Revision Received:
July 3, 2013
Citation
Van Bossuyt, D. L., Dong, A., Tumer, I. Y., and Carvalho, L. (September 18, 2013). "On Measuring Engineering Risk Attitudes." ASME. J. Mech. Des. December 2013; 135(12): 121001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025118
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Restraint Systems in Tactical Vehicles: Uncertainty Study Involving Airbags, Seatbelts, and Military Gear
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (March,2019)
Nuclear Multiscale Systems Analysis for Safety and Security
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (September,2018)
Prospect Theory-based Real Options Analysis for Noncommercial Assets
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (March,2015)
Reliability and Risk Controlled by the Simultaneous Presence of Random Events on a Time Interval
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (June,2018)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Extension of the Dynamic Abort Risk Evaluator (DARE) to Shuttle Derived Launch Vehicles (PSAM-0094)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
QRAS Approach to Phased Mission Analysis (PSAM-0444)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
The Effect of Conservatism on Identifying Influential Parameters (PSAM-0381)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)