This paper presents two design experiments to evaluate the impact of the size and shape of a morphological chart used to identify promising concepts within those charts. In each experiment, students designed either a burrito folder or a pet feeder. The first experiment used two rectangular morphological charts; one vertically oriented with more functions and one horizontally oriented with more means. The second experiment used four morphological charts, two charts similar to the first experiment and two nearly square with a similar number of functions and means. Participants from similar populations were enrolled and similar protocols were followed to align the results for comparison. A comparison of the significant aspects of each experiment emphasized the problem, the participants, the morphological charts employed, and the experimental procedures. Furthermore, a critique of the two experiments is provided and joint conclusions are drawn. Experimental results suggest that reducing information in the morphological charts, such as the number of functions, enhances the likelihood for developing higher quality integrated concept solutions. While accurate for most configurations, this benefit is limited in that the largest sized chart failed to show worse results compared with smaller counterparts.

References

References
1.
Pahl
,
G.
, and
Beitz
,
W.
, 1996,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
.
2.
Otto
,
K.
, and
Wood
,
K.
, 2001,
Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development
,
Prentice-Hall
,
NJ
.
3.
Ullman
,
D.
, 2002,
The Mechanical Design Process
,
Pearson Education
, Inc.,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
.
4.
Pahl
,
G.
, and
Beitz
,
W.
, 1966,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
.
5.
Dym
,
C.
, and
Little
,
P.
, 2000,
Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction
,
John Wiley & Sons
, Inc.,
New York
.
6.
Suh
,
N.
, 2001,
Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications
,
Oxford University Press
,
New York
.
7.
Shah
,
J.
, 1998, “
Experimental Investigation of Progressive Idea Generation Techniques in Engineering Design
,”
ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Atlanta
,
GA
.
8.
Whiting
,
C. S.
, 1958,
Creative thinking
,
Reinhold
,
New York
.
9.
Ullrich
,
K.
, and
Eppinger
,
S.
, 2000,
Product Design and Development
,
McGraw-Hill
,
Boston, MA
.
10.
Teegavarapu
,
S.
,
Snider
,
M.
,
Summers
,
J. D.
,
Thompson
,
L.
, and
Grujicic
,
M.
, 2007, “
A Driver for Selection of Functionally Inequivalent Concepts at Varying Levels of Abstraction
,”
J. Design Res.
,
6
, pp.
239
259
.
11.
Aygun
,
M.
, 2000, “
Comparative Performance Appraisal by Multiple Criteria for Design Alternatives
,”
Archit. Sci. Rev.
,
43
, pp.
31
36
.
12.
Bryant
,
C.
,
Bohm
,
M.
,
Stone
,
R.
, and
McAdams
,
D.
, 2007, “
An Interactive Morphological Matrix Computational Design Tool: A Hybrid of Two Methods
,”
ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Las Vegas
,
NV
.
13.
Bohm
,
M.
,
Vucovich
,
J.
, and
Stone
,
R.
, 2005, “
Capturing Creativity: Using a Design Repository to Drive Concept Innovation
,”
ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Long Beach
,
CA
.
14.
Bryant
,
C.
,
McAdams
,
D.
,
Stone
,
R.
,
Kurtoglu
,
T.
, and
Campbell
,
M.
, 2006, “
A Validation Study of an Automated Concept Generator Design Tool
,”
ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Philadelphia
,
PA
.
15.
Bohm
,
M.
,
Stone
,
R.
, and
Szykman
,
S.
, 2003, “
Enhancing Virtual Product Representations for Advanced Design Repository Systems
,”
ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Chicago
,
IL
.
16.
Tiwari
,
S.
,
Teegavarapu
,
S.
,
Summers
,
J.
, and
Fadel
,
G.
, 2007, “
Automating Morphological Chart Exploration: A Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm to Address Compatibility and Uncertainty
,”
Int. J. Product Dev.
,
9
, pp.
111
139
.
17.
Weas
,
A.
, and
Campbell
,
M.
, 2004, “
Rediscovering the Analysis of Interconnected Decision Areas
,”
Artif. Intell. Eng. Des Anal. Manuf.
,
18
, pp.
227
243
.
18.
Jin
,
Y.
, and
Li
,
W.
, 2007, “
Design Concept Generation: A Hierarchical Coevolutionary Approach
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des
,
129
, pp.
1012
1022
.
19.
Koch
,
P. N.
,
Allen
,
J. K.
,
Mistree
,
F.
, and
Barlow
,
A.
, 1998, “
Facilitating Concept Exploration for Configuring Turbine Propulsion Systems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des
,
120
, pp.
702
706
.
20.
Barnum
,
G. J.
, and
Mattson
,
C. A.
, 2010, “
A Computationally Assisted Methodology for Preference-Guided Conceptual Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des
,
132
, pp.
121003
121009
.
21.
Adelson
,
B.
, 1989, “
Cognitive Research: Uncovering How Designers Design; Cognitive Modeling: Explaining and Predicting How Designers Design
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
1
, pp.
35
429
.
22.
Newell
,
A.
, 1990,
Unified Theories of Cognition
,
First Harvard University Press
,
Cambridge, MA
.
23.
Koch
,
P.
,
Allen
,
J.
,
Mistree
,
F.
, and
Mavris
,
D.
, 1997, “
The Problem of Size in Robust Design
,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Sacramento, CA, Papr No. DETC97DAC3983.
24.
Shah
,
J. J.
,
Kulkarni
,
S. V.
, and
Vargas-Hernandez
,
N.
, 2000, “
Evaluation of Idea Generation Methods for Conceptual Design: Effectiveness Metrics and Design of Experiments
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des
,
122
, pp.
377
384
.
25.
Richardson
,
J.
,
Summers
,
J. D.
, and
Mocko
,
G. M.
, 2011, “
Function Representations in Morphological Charts: An Experimental Study on Variety and Novelty of Means Generated
,”
presented at the 21st CIRP Design Conference
,
Daejeon
,
South Korea
.
26.
Richardson
,
J.
, 2010, “
Incorporating Function Structures into Morphological Charts: A User Study
,”
MS Thesis
,
Clemson University
,
Clemson, SC
.
27.
Ramachandran
,
R.
, 2012, “
Understanding the Role of Functions and Interaction in the Product Design
,” Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
28.
Ramachandran
,
R.
,
Caldwell
,
B.
, and
Mocko
,
G.
, 2011, “
A User Study to Evaluate the Function Model and Function Interaction Model for Concept Generation
,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineering Conference, Washington, DC.
29.
Smith
,
G.
, 2007, “
Morphological Charts: A Systematic Exploration of Qualitative Design Space
,”
MS Thesis
,
Clemson University
,
Clemson, SC
.
30.
Pahl
,
G.
,
Beitz
,
W.
,
Feldhusen
,
J.
, and
Grote
,
K. H.
, 2007,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
, 3rd. ed.,
Springer-Verlag
,
London
.
31.
Daniel
,
W.
, and
Terrell
,
J.
, 1995,
Business Statistics
,
Houghton Mifflin
,
Co Boston, MA
.
32.
Ruder
,
J.
, and
Sobek
,
D.
, 2007, “
An Experiment on System Level Design
,”
J. Eng. Design
,
18
, pp.
327
342
.
33.
Wetmore
,
W.
,
Summers
,
J.
, and
Greenstein
,
J.
, 2010, “
Experimental Study of Influence of Group Familiarity and Information Sharing on Design Review Effectiveness
,”
J. Eng. Design
,
21
, pp.
111
126
.
You do not currently have access to this content.