The essential function of a mechanical assembly is the removal of degrees of freedom (DOF) to enable the transfer of load between two bodies. Assembly constraint features serve to provide this DOF removal, so their locations and orientations greatly affect the quality of an assembly as measured by its ability to resist relative motion between the parts. This paper addresses attachment-level design in which design decisions are made to establish the types, locations, and orientations of assembly features. The analysis methodology in this paper models assembly features such as point, pin, line, and plane constraints with equivalent first, second, and third order wrench systems. The set of relative motions to be evaluated is generated by composing from among these constraints a five-system pivot wrench combination to which a freedom screw motion is reciprocal. The effectiveness of each constraint to resist these motions is calculated as the ratio of the reaction forces at each resisting constraint to the input wrench magnitude. Based on these resistance values, multiple rating metrics are calculated to rate the overall assembly’s performance in resisting the motion. This work represents the first tool available to analyze a constraint configuration’s effectiveness to resist motion with a quantitative metric. Case studies are presented to demonstrate the utility of the analysis tool.

References

References
1.
Ball
,
R. S.
, 1990,
A Treatise on the Theory of Screws
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK.
2.
Reuleaux
,
F.
, 1876,
The Kinematics of Machinery
,
MacMillan
,
London
.
3.
Waldron
,
K.
, 1996, “
The Constraint Analysis of Mechanisms
,”
J. Mech.
,
1
, pp.
101
114
.
4.
Hunt
,
K. H.
, 1978,
Kinematic Geometry of Mechanisms
,
Oxford University Press
,
New York
.
5.
Rimon
,
E.
, and
Burdick
,
J.
, 1996, “
On Force and Form Closure for Multiple Finger Grasps
,”
Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
,
Minneapolis
,
MN
, pp.
1795
1800
.
6.
Yoshikawa
,
T.
, 1996, “
Passive and Active Closures by Constraining Mechanisms
,”
Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
, Vol.
2
, pp.
1477
1484
.
7.
Shapiro
,
A.
,
Rimon
,
E.
, and
Burdick
,
J. W.
, 2001, “
Passive Force Closure and its Computation in Compliant-Rigid Grasps
,”
IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
, Vol.
3
, pp.
1769
1775
.
8.
Nguyen
,
V.
, 1988, “
Constructing Force-Closure Grasps
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
7
(
3
), pp.
3
16
.
9.
Adams
,
J. D.
, and
Whitney
,
D. E.
, 1999, “
Application of Screw Theory to Constraint Analysis of Assemblies of Rigid Parts
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning
,
Porto
,
Portugal
, pp.
69
74
.
10.
Trinkle
,
J. C.
, 1992, “
A Quantitative Test for Form Closure Grasps
,”
Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Raleigh, NC
, pp.
1670
1677
.
11.
Chen
,
Y.-C.
, and
Walker
,
I. D.
, 1994, “
Visualization of Form-Closure and Force Distribution for Grasping Solid Objects
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
, Vol.
1
, pp.
154
159
.
12.
Salisbury
,
J. K.
, and
Roth
,
B.
, 1983, “
Kinematic and Force Analysis of Articulated Mechanical Hands
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des.
,
105
(
1
), pp.
35
41
.
13.
Kerr
,
J.
, and
Roth
,
B.
, 1986, “
Analysis of Multifingered Hands
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
4
(
4
), pp.
3
17
.
14.
Dai
,
J. S.
, and
Kerr
,
D. R.
, 1996, “
Analysis of Force Distribution in Grasps Using Augmentation
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
210
(
3
), pp.
15
22
.
15.
Wang
,
M. Y.
, and
Pelinescu
,
D. M.
, 2003, “
Contact Force Prediction and Force Closure Analysis of a Fixture Rigid Workpiece With Friction
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
125
(
2
), pp.
325
332
.
16.
Asada
,
H.
, and
By
,
A. B.
, 1985, “
Kinematic Analysis of Workpart Fixturing for Flexible Assembly With Automatically Reconfigurable Fixtures
,”
IEEE J. Rob. Autom.
,
RA-1
(
2
), pp.
86
94
.
17.
Ohwovoriole
,
M. S.
, and
Roth
,
B.
, 1981, “
An Extension of Screw Theory
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
103
, pp.
725
735
.
18.
Bausch
,
J. J.
, and
Youcef-Toumi
,
K.
, 1990, “
Kinematic Methods for Automated Reconfiguration Planning
,”
Proceedings 1990 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, OH
, pp.
1396
1401
.
19.
Lakshminarayana
,
K.
, 1978, “
Mechanics of Form Closure
,” ASME Paper 78-DET-32, New York.
20.
Bozzo
,
T.
, 1997, “
A Constraint Rating Scheme for Snap-fit Assemblies
,” M.S. thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
21.
DeMeter
,
E. C.
, 1993, “
Selection of Fixture Configuration for the Maximization of Mechanical Leverage
,”
Proceedings of the 1993 ASME Winter Annual Meeting
,
New Orleans
,
LA
, Vol.
64
, pp.
491
506
.
22.
DeMeter
,
E. C.
, 1994, “
Restraint Analysis of Fixtures Which Rely on Surface Contact
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
116
(
2
), pp.
207
215
.
23.
Slocum
,
A. H.
, 1992,
Precision Machine Design
,
Prentice-Hall
,
New Jersey
.
You do not currently have access to this content.